Drug distribution company McKesson (NYSE:MCK) revealed in a June 21 regulatory filing that had CEO John Hammergren retired March 31, he would have been entitled to a $159 million pension. The largest pension in the history of corporate America; should shareholders be concerned? I'll have a look at this thorny issue. ProsIn order to recruit a quality CEO it's vital for companies to provide a compensation package attractive enough to get that person to leave their current situation. Putting the bar as high as Mckesson has done, it likely won't be difficult attracting top flight candidates both from inside an outside the company. In fiscal 2013, John Hammergren earned $51.7 million, of which $24.2 million wasn't actual cash paid out but rather the year-over-year change in actuarial present value of his pension benefits. It's enough to get anyone's attention, even jaded, already wealthy CEOs. SEE: A Guide To CEO Compensation How did McKesson come up with the $159 million figure? At the end of every fiscal year it looks at a number of actuarial assumptions in order to come up with a lump-sum payment that would be paid within seven months of retirement. In its 2013 DEF14A, it provides the following explanation of how it calculates the basic retirement benefit under the Executive Benefit Retirement Plan or EBRP for short:"…The hypothetical annuity benefit payable under the Retirement Share Plan is calculated by first determining the value of each share credited to the participant’s account as of the date it was credited, then applying an annual 12% rate to that value from the date the share was credited to the account to the date the participant’s EBRP benefit is scheduled to begin. The aggregate value of the shares credited to the participant’s Retirement Share Plan is then converted to a straight-life annuity. The resulting annuity is converted to a lump-sum amount using the interest rate prescribed by the PBGC for purposes of determining the present value of a lump-sum distribution…" In 2013, it reduced the lump-sum interest rate it uses to calculate its pension liability from 4.0% to 2.3% to reflect the prolonged period of low interest rates. That adjustment accounted for the majority of the $24.2 million increase with approximately $2 million for an additional year of service. Hammergren and Executive Vice President Paul Julian are the only two executives with employment agreements; once they retire that will be the end of the practice. McKesson originally created an employment agreement for Hammergren when it hired him in January 1996. The agreement, in large part, was used to induce the executive to move to the company. Since the agreement first took effect on January 31, 1996, its stock's achieved a total return of 468% compared to 239% for the SPDR S&P 500 (NYSEARCA:SPY). It's hard to argue with this kind of performance. ConsAccording to the Wall Street Journal--Bolton Partners Inc., an actuarial firm, and Gallagher HR Consulting, an executive-compensation consultant, helped out--Hammergren's base pension is only $35.8 million. However, adding into consideration five special factors including a low interest rate and added years of service, the pension quickly balloons to the number that's got executive compensation experts apoplectic. James Reda of Gallagher HR Consulting views it as "excessive' in light of Mr. Hammergren's $89 million in total compensation (less change in Pension Value) over the past three years. Only Rupert Murdoch comes anywhere close. Add approximately $246 million in company stock, not to mention what he's sold over the years, and Hammergren's close to being a billionaire. SEE: Evaluating Executive Compensation Look more closely at its performance and you'll see that a good portion of McKesson's total return was achieved between January 1996 and June 1998 when Hammergren wasn't even the CEO. Over the past 15 years, McKesson's total return on an annualized basis through June 25, 2013, is 2.5%. This compares to an average of 13.9% for peers Cardinal Health (NYSE:CAH), AmerisourceBergen (NYSE:ABC) and Express Scripts (Nasdaq:ESRX). Hammergren's success has more to do with timing than it does being a good CEO. Bottom LineBy no means am I suggesting John Hammergren is a bad CEO. However, the numbers suggest that a payday of close to a billion dollars over a 13-year period is highly unusual and entirely unearned. Should McKesson shareholders be concerned about Hammergren's $159 million pension? You're done right they should. Unfortunately, there's not much that can be done at this point in the proceedings. All they can do now is ensure the same thing doesn't happen in the future. Fool me once, shame on you--fool me twice, shame on me.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    5 Cheap Dividend Stocks for a Bear Market

    Here are five stocks that pay safe dividends and should be at least somewhat resilient to a bear market.
  2. Investing

    How to Win More by Losing Less in Today’s Markets

    The further you fall, the harder it is to climb back up. It’s a universal truth that is painfully apparent in the investing world.
  3. Fundamental Analysis

    Use Options Data To Predict Stock Market Direction

    Options market trading data can provide important insights about the direction of stocks and the overall market. Here’s how to track it.
  4. Stock Analysis

    2 Oil Stocks to Buy Right Now (PSX,TSO)

    Can these two oil stocks buck the trend?
  5. Investing News

    What Alcoa’s (AA) Breakup Means for Investors

    Alcoa plans to split into two companies. Is this a bullish catalyst for investors?
  6. Stock Analysis

    Top 3 Stocks for the Coming Holiday Season

    If you want to buck the bear market trend by going long on consumer stocks, these three might be your best bets.
  7. Investing News

    Could a Rate Hike Send Stocks Higher?

    A rate hike would certainly alter the investment scene, but would it be for the better or worse?
  8. Investing News

    Corporate Bonds or Stocks: Which is Better Now?

    With market volatility high, you may think it is time to run for corporate bonds instead of stocks. Before you do take a deeper look into which is better.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    Using Short ETFs to Battle a Down Market

    Instead of selling your stocks to get gains, consider a short selling strategy, specifically one that uses short ETFs that help manage the risk.
  10. Investing Basics

    How to Diversify with International Stocks

    Diversifying with international stocks can benefit most portfolios, but beware of country risk.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!