Make no mistake about what Adobe (Nasdaq:ADBE) management is thinking – the company's legacy digital media business (Creative Suite/Creative Cloud, which includes well-known offerings like Photoshop) is primarily a source of cash flow, while digital marketing/marketing cloud is where the company's future growth will be generated. To that end, Adobe is spending another $600 million to enhance its capabilities and compete more effectively with the likes of Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL), IBM (NYSE:IBM), and (NYSE:CRM).

Spending Money To Make Money
Adobe announced Thursday evening that it had reached an agreement to acquire privately-held Neolane for $600 million in cash. While certainly not a household name to most investors, Neolane is an emerging player in marketing management software, with a strong position in areas like lead management and cross-channel campaign management. 

SEE: A Primer On Investing In The Tech Industry
Adobe didn't provide many details, but the general consensus is that Neolane earned about $60 million in revenue in calendar 2012 (with revenue growing 40%), and that Adobe is paying a forward multiple similar (or at least in the ballpark) to what Oracle paid for Eloqua and what recently agreed to pay for ExactTarget (NYSE:ET), not to mention what Marketo (Nasdaq:MKTO) currently trades for in the market.
A Logical Fit, But There Will Be Some Work To Do
With its capabilities in campaign management, Neolane was a logical buy for Adobe – it wasn't that long ago when Adobe management specifically mentioned that this was an area of weakness for the company, and one where they would consider M&A to improve. Moreover, it's a good compliment to Adobe's existing strength in areas like web analytics, content management, audience optimization, and customer experience management.
Perhaps just as much to the point, the moves made by Oracle and didn't leave Adobe with a lot of choice if they wanted to continue to build towards an integrated digital marketing platform.
But this is not automatically plug-and-play. As the $60 million in estimate revenue would suggest, this is not a large company, and now its Adobe's job to build the business up in the face of competition from large and well-run software rivals. What's more, Neolane strikes me as more focused/oriented towards on-premise services than hosted/cloud services. I don't think accelerating the transition will be all that difficult for Adobe, but it does offer some integration risk above and beyond the norm.

SEE: Pinpoint Takeovers First
Buy Vs. Build – That Will Always Be The Question
I hardly think Adobe (or its rivals) are done building their new marketing businesses. Adobe already offers a lot under its umbrella – from the aforementioned marketing functions to content creation tools and so on. But there's probably still room to add more community/social capabilities, mobile, creation/management, and automation tools.
The key question for Adobe (as well as, Oracle, IBM, SAP, and so on) will be the buy-versus-build debate. Investors haven't been punishing the acquirers all that much, but there will come a time when shareholders (particularly large institutions) start getting fussy about seeing cash going towards 8x forward revenue acquisitions instead of back to them in buybacks, special dividends, and so on. That could be particularly true in the case of Adobe, where the future margin leverage and competitive dynamics of digital marketing are likely to be quite a bit different than the company's historical experience in digital media.
The Bottom Line
As I expected a deal for a company like Neolane, I can't very well claim that it changes my opinion on Adobe all that much. They paid the going rate and it's a logical deal that fills a few needs for the company. If I have any particular feeling about the move, it's that I wonder what it says about the publicly-traded companies (like Marketo) that Adobe bypassed.
I still believe that Adobe is pretty fairly valued, but that it is also a quality company undergoing a pretty big change in its operating philosophy and long-term goals. I'd reconsider the shares on a pullback, but they don't hold any particular appeal for me today.

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What Exactly Are Arbitrage Mutual Funds?

    Learn about arbitrage funds and how this type of investment generates profits by taking advantage of price differentials between the cash and futures markets.
  2. Investing News

    Ferrari’s IPO: Ready to Roll or Poor Timing?

    Will Ferrari's shares move fast off the line only to sputter later?
  3. Stock Analysis

    5 Cheap Dividend Stocks for a Bear Market

    Here are five stocks that pay safe dividends and should be at least somewhat resilient to a bear market.
  4. Investing

    Kevin O'Leary Biography

    Kevin O'Leary is a television personality, businessman and investor from Canada. A brash public personality with a net worth of roughly $300 million, he is considered to be the Canada’s answer ...
  5. Investing

    How to Win More by Losing Less in Today’s Markets

    The further you fall, the harder it is to climb back up. It’s a universal truth that is painfully apparent in the investing world.
  6. Fundamental Analysis

    Use Options Data To Predict Stock Market Direction

    Options market trading data can provide important insights about the direction of stocks and the overall market. Here’s how to track it.
  7. Stock Analysis

    2 Oil Stocks to Buy Right Now (PSX,TSO)

    Can these two oil stocks buck the trend?
  8. Investing News

    What Alcoa’s (AA) Breakup Means for Investors

    Alcoa plans to split into two companies. Is this a bullish catalyst for investors?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Top 3 Stocks for the Coming Holiday Season

    If you want to buck the bear market trend by going long on consumer stocks, these three might be your best bets.
  10. Investing News

    Could a Rate Hike Send Stocks Higher?

    A rate hike would certainly alter the investment scene, but would it be for the better or worse?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the formula for calculating weighted average cost of capital (WACC) in Excel?

    When analyzing different financing options, companies need to look at how much it will cost to fund operations. There are ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!