Make no mistake about what Adobe (Nasdaq:ADBE) management is thinking – the company's legacy digital media business (Creative Suite/Creative Cloud, which includes well-known offerings like Photoshop) is primarily a source of cash flow, while digital marketing/marketing cloud is where the company's future growth will be generated. To that end, Adobe is spending another $600 million to enhance its capabilities and compete more effectively with the likes of Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL), IBM (NYSE:IBM), and (NYSE:CRM).

Spending Money To Make Money
Adobe announced Thursday evening that it had reached an agreement to acquire privately-held Neolane for $600 million in cash. While certainly not a household name to most investors, Neolane is an emerging player in marketing management software, with a strong position in areas like lead management and cross-channel campaign management. 

SEE: A Primer On Investing In The Tech Industry
Adobe didn't provide many details, but the general consensus is that Neolane earned about $60 million in revenue in calendar 2012 (with revenue growing 40%), and that Adobe is paying a forward multiple similar (or at least in the ballpark) to what Oracle paid for Eloqua and what recently agreed to pay for ExactTarget (NYSE:ET), not to mention what Marketo (Nasdaq:MKTO) currently trades for in the market.
A Logical Fit, But There Will Be Some Work To Do
With its capabilities in campaign management, Neolane was a logical buy for Adobe – it wasn't that long ago when Adobe management specifically mentioned that this was an area of weakness for the company, and one where they would consider M&A to improve. Moreover, it's a good compliment to Adobe's existing strength in areas like web analytics, content management, audience optimization, and customer experience management.
Perhaps just as much to the point, the moves made by Oracle and didn't leave Adobe with a lot of choice if they wanted to continue to build towards an integrated digital marketing platform.
But this is not automatically plug-and-play. As the $60 million in estimate revenue would suggest, this is not a large company, and now its Adobe's job to build the business up in the face of competition from large and well-run software rivals. What's more, Neolane strikes me as more focused/oriented towards on-premise services than hosted/cloud services. I don't think accelerating the transition will be all that difficult for Adobe, but it does offer some integration risk above and beyond the norm.

SEE: Pinpoint Takeovers First
Buy Vs. Build – That Will Always Be The Question
I hardly think Adobe (or its rivals) are done building their new marketing businesses. Adobe already offers a lot under its umbrella – from the aforementioned marketing functions to content creation tools and so on. But there's probably still room to add more community/social capabilities, mobile, creation/management, and automation tools.
The key question for Adobe (as well as, Oracle, IBM, SAP, and so on) will be the buy-versus-build debate. Investors haven't been punishing the acquirers all that much, but there will come a time when shareholders (particularly large institutions) start getting fussy about seeing cash going towards 8x forward revenue acquisitions instead of back to them in buybacks, special dividends, and so on. That could be particularly true in the case of Adobe, where the future margin leverage and competitive dynamics of digital marketing are likely to be quite a bit different than the company's historical experience in digital media.
The Bottom Line
As I expected a deal for a company like Neolane, I can't very well claim that it changes my opinion on Adobe all that much. They paid the going rate and it's a logical deal that fills a few needs for the company. If I have any particular feeling about the move, it's that I wonder what it says about the publicly-traded companies (like Marketo) that Adobe bypassed.
I still believe that Adobe is pretty fairly valued, but that it is also a quality company undergoing a pretty big change in its operating philosophy and long-term goals. I'd reconsider the shares on a pullback, but they don't hold any particular appeal for me today.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    3 Resilient Oil Stocks for a Down Market

    Stuck on oil? Take a look at these six stocks—three that present risk vs. three that offer some resiliency.
  2. Economics

    Keep an Eye on These Emerging Economies

    Emerging markets have been hammered lately, but these three countries (and their large and young populations) are worth monitoring.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Is Pepsi (PEP) Still a Safe Bet?

    PepsiCo has long been known as one of the most resilient stocks throughout the broader market. Is this still the case today?
  4. Investing

    The ABCs of Bond ETF Distributions

    How do bond exchange traded fund (ETF) distributions work? It’s a question I get a lot. First, let’s explain what we mean by distributions.
  5. Investing

    The Top Businesses Nurtured By Y Combinator

    We look at the top startups that were incubated at Y Combinator, one of the world's most popular business incubator firms.
  6. Investing

    Why Perceptual Computing Is The Future 

    Perceptual computing will have a major impact on our future in the coming years. Here's why.
  7. Stock Analysis

    3 Stocks that Are Top Bets for Retirement

    These three stocks are resilient, fundamentally sound and also pay generous dividends.
  8. Investing News

    Are Stocks Cheap Now? Nope. And Here's Why

    Are stocks cheap right now? Be wary of those who are telling you what you want to hear. Here's why.
  9. Investing News

    4 Value Stocks Worth Your Immediate Attention

    Here are four stocks that offer good value and will likely outperform the majority of stocks throughout the broader market over the next several years.
  10. Investing News

    These 3 High-Quality Stocks Are Dividend Royalty

    Here are three resilient, dividend-paying companies that may mitigate some worry in an uncertain investing environment.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the formula for calculating weighted average cost of capital (WACC) in Excel?

    When analyzing different financing options, companies need to look at how much it will cost to fund operations. There are ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!