National supermarket chain Kroger (NYSE:KR) appears to be running off the playbook that says strong companies should leverage that strength to put even more distance between them and their rivals. In buying Harris Teeter (Nasdaq:HTSI), Kroger is not only buying a growing, high-quality grocery chain in the Mid-Atlantic, but also positioning itself to take advantage of even more leverage in purchasing, distribution, and logistics. Provided Kroger doesn't interfere with what made Harris Teeter stand out from the crowd, this looks like a deal with good long-term return prospects.
Paying Up For A Good Property
Harris Teeter was widely known to be for sale, with multiple speculations in the financial press about which private equity groups had, or had not, placed bids for the growing mid-Atlantic chain of supermarkets. Accordingly, it's no great surprise that Kroger had to pay up to get a deal done.
Kroger will pay $49.38 per share in cash, and assume $100 million in Harris Teeter debt. Not only is that per-share price about one-third higher than where Harris Teeter was before word spread that the company was exploring a scale, but the EV/revenue and EV/EBTIDA multiples are well ahead of industry averages. 

SEE: Value Investing Using The Enterprise Multiple
Kroger is paying an EV/revenue multiple of 0.5x and an EV/EBITDA multiple of 7.7x. Safeway (NYSE:SWY) currently trades at multiples of 0.26x and 5.23x, SUPERVALU (NYSE: SVU) trades at 0.27x, and 8.86x, Kroger itself trades at 0.27x and 5.84x, Ahold (Nasdaq:AHONY) (which owns Giant stores in the U.S.) trades at 0.33x and 5.05x, and Delhaize (NYSE:DEG) (which owns Food Lion in the U.S.) trades at 0.30x and 4.73x.
Why Pay Up?
So why should Kroger pay almost 50% to 100% above the going rates for supermarkets? For starters, Harris Teeter is located squarely in some of the most appealing markets in the country, including states like North Carolina, Virginia, Florida, and Georgia. Second, the company's differentiated store format, emphasis on fresh/healthy foods, and high service levels has led to significantly above-average growth with revenue and operating income growing at long-term rates in the mid single-digits versus virtually no growth (or actual contraction) for many rivals.
Adding Harris Teeter also adds scale, though, and the possibility of leveraging costs even further. Food retailing is a cutthroat low-margin business (sometimes even with specialty retailers like Whole Foods (NYSE:WFM) and Natural Grocers (Nasdaq:NGVC) and Kroger can now drive harder bargains with suppliers, as well as better leverage existing infrastructure and logistics across both stores. What's more, Kroger has a pretty good record of hitting merger-related cost targets and management here is talking about realizing $40 million to $50 million in annual cost savings within five years.
Still Some Risks Left
Although the deal does not allow Harris Teeter to actively solicit competing bids, I suppose there's still a chance that a rival will outbid Kroger. I don't think this is particularly likely. Even with access to cheap debt, I don't see how a private equity bidder can achieve the same synergies and cost savings as a strategic buyer like Kroger and justify a higher bid. On the strategic side, I can't see who would outbid Kroger – companies that may want to lack the financial strength to do so and companies with the financial strength to do so (like perhaps Costco (Nasdaq:COST)) have no clear strategic purpose in doing so.
SEE: 5 Earnings Season Investing Tips

The bigger risk, then, is in Kroger screwing this up. As a frequent Harris Teeter shopper, I was not happy to see this news roll across the ticker this morning, as I would hate to see Kroger simply fold Harris Teeter into its existing operations and reduce the service and quality levels to Kroger standards. At this point, though, Kroger management is talking about Harris Teeter continuing to operate as an independent subsidiary, with current management staying in place and no store closings.
I guess we'll have to wait and see what happens. If Kroger ultimately does change how Harris Teeter operates, I see the store additions, footprint expansions, and cost savings as leading the deal to being net neutral, allowing the company to get bigger, but not necessarily all that better. If Kroger sticks with this plan to allow Harris Teeter to operate its own way, though, I can see this deal adding value to Kroger long-term, as well as giving the company a valuable food retailing niche between the likes of regular supermarkets and Wal-mart (NYSE:WMT) and the more expensive specialty food retailers like Whole Foods.

Related Articles
  1. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Performance Review: Emerging Markets Equities in 2015

    Find out why emerging markets struggled in 2015 and why a half-decade long trend of poor returns is proving optimistic growth investors wrong.
  3. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
  4. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
  5. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
  6. Stock Analysis

    How to Find Quality Stocks Amid the Wreckage

    Finding companies with good earnings and hitting on all cylinders in this environment, although possible, is not easy.
  7. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  9. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center