Alright, Will Ashworth, you win this round! One quarter ago, fellow Investopedia writer Will Ashworth took issue with me seeing limited appreciation potential in Starbucks (Nasdaq:SBUX) and laid out a case that Starbucks was still a good buy. With the stock up about 22% over the last quarter, blowing away other restaurants like McDonald's (NYSE: MCD) and other consumer stocks in general, there's little else for me to do but see where I got Starbucks so wrong and reevaluated where it can go from here.
 
Another Strong Quarter
Starbucks was a strong story in the fiscal second quarter, and it got stronger still in the third quarter. Revenue rose 13%, with retail revenue up 14% and specialty up 10%. Underpinning sales, Starbucks saw comp-store growth of 8% overall (transactions up 7%, ticket up 1%), with 9% growth in the U.S. and China/Asia Pacific and 2% growth in Europe.
 
With higher revenue also came better operating leverage. Gross margin improved more than a point from last year, while operating income rose 25%. That, in turn, led a point and a half of operating margin improvement.

SEE: The Value Investor's Handbook
 
Setting The Bar In QSR
In a nutshell, I went wrong on Starbucks in large part because I underestimated the momentum in the company's store base and the extent to which this isn't your regular quick service restaurant (QSR). Leading QSR McDonald's has seen same-store sales slow noticeably in the U.S., even with ongoing success in the McCafe concept. Even top-end QSRs like Panera (Nasdaq: PNRA) and Chipotle (NYSE: CMG) are seeing comps in the mid single digits, while another prime Starbucks coffee rival Dunkin' Brands (Nasdaq: DNKN) is comping at a 4% rate.

Then there's Starbucks with that 9% comp, with 7% growth in transactions. Simply put, people are not only not willing to give up their morning Starbucks fix, but they're going their more often than just in the morning (and/or more people are going … it's not really possible to do a “same customer” analysis from the outside). 
 
What's more, I can appreciate that Starbucks can continue to grow its same-store sales if by nothing more than making more products available in every store. It's still early in the process of integrating Teavana and La Boulange, but there is certainly potential for Starbucks to continue growing beyond its core/traditional footprint in premium coffee. Said differently, if Starbucks can get even just one-quarter of its regular customers to occasionally add a croissant or muffin to their coffee order, that's a meaningful improvement in both comps and margins.
 
Executing On The China Opportunity
I also think I underestimated the company's momentum in China. While Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM) and McDonald's are suffering from image problems brought on by using antibiotics-contaminated chicken, not to mention public health and consumer spending issues, Starbucks is not. At 9%, Starbucks' China comps are likely at or near the top of the market, and there is still tremendous store growth potential in the market (to say nothing of markets down the line like India, Indonesia, Vietnam, and so on).
 
SEE: How To Analyze Restaurant Stocks

The Bottom Line
Maybe Starbucks is just basking in a new-found love affair for coffee on the part of investors. After all, Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (Nasdaq: GMCR) is also up almost 40% over the last three months, and coffee-centric stories like Kraft (Nasdaq: KRFT) and Dunkin are up pretty solidly as well. Likewise, there is still the risk that Starbucks' comp momentum fades and takes the margin leverage with it.
 
I'm not expecting that to happen. Even so, I think you have to make some pretty exceptional assumptions to get an attractive fair value on these shares. Let's say Starbucks can grow revenue at almost 12% a year for a decade, and improve its free cash flow by 20% a year. Should that occur, Starbucks will be at 90% of the annual revenue run rate projected for McDonald's in 2022, though the free cash flow margin will be a little lower. With the same discount rate I use for McDonald's, that leads to a $70 price target. So although I'm willing to take my lumps for missing the huge move in Starbucks, I still end up wondering just how this company will manage to continue to outgrow expectations.
 
Disclosure – At the time of writing, the author had no positions in any of the stocks mentioned.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center