It's not too much of a stretch to say that Parker Hannifin (NYSE:PH) makes industry move. Although the company doesn't give much in the way of end-market breakouts, hydraulics, seals, valves, and connectors are vital to a host of markets ranging from vehicles to energy to basic machinery, and Parker counts customers as diverse as Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) and McDonald's (NYSE:MCD) in its roster.
 
Orders haven't been very good for a while now, and that has basically mirrored the malaise in the wider industrial market. Although Parker's fiscal fourth quarter performance was not very strong (and guidance likely disappointed many investors), flat orders and management's commentary about signs that the economy is bottoming could make this a stock to watch again.
 
Closing A Tough Year On A Whimper
Those investors who follow heavy/commercial vehicle manufacturers like Caterpillar or Terex (NYSE:TEX) already know how challenging these past few quarters have been, and likewise for companies like Illinois Tool Works (NYSE:ITW) with more “general industrial” exposure. Even so, this wasn't a good performance for Parker Hannifin.
 
Revenue was down 2% on an organic basis, with Climate / Industrial Controls down 16%, Industrial North America down 6%, and Industrial International down almost 1%. Aerospace was the lone bright spot, as revenue improved almost 10%. 
 
While revenue was close to the sell-side target, margins came in quite weak. Gross margin declined by a point, while segment profits declined 6% (an 8% miss relative to the sell-side). Although earnings in the Climate/Controls business were flat (leading to about two points of margin improvement), Industrial North America and International were down 10% and 5%, respectively, and Aerospace was barely up. Accordingly, these three businesses saw unit margins down around one point to 130bp.
 
I can't say that management's explanation helped much. I can appreciate the impact of lower volumes in North America and expenses tied to acquisitions, forex, and inventory reductions, but the disappointment relative to the revenue performance is still surprising.

SEE: Target Prices: The Key To Sound Investing
 
How Much Better Is Better?
Not surprisingly, I've seen some bullish sell-side analysts already coming to Parker's defense, citing the more or less flat order performance as a “meaningful improvement” from the declines of recent quarters. Still, I think it's worth noting that management's guidance for revenue growth next year seems to top out at around 4%, and that's hardly “full-blown recovery”. Likewise, a reduction in guidance of about 9% on a like-for-like basis is not what you expect to see if the economy is bottoming and about to turn.
 
Still, I can appreciate management's caution. Orders in the industrial business were quite a bit better (down 5% in North America, up 3% International) than the 12% decline seen in Eaton's (NYSE:ETN) hydraulics bookings, but with the recovery in China's construction market very uncertain and Caterpillar's management seemingly taking a “you'll know when we know” tone of uncertainty, there's a lot of doubt out there. All told, while I do think Parker will see better demand in commercial aerospace and improvements in markets like industrial automation, off-highway vehicle demand and conditions in the energy markets are still very uncertain at this point.
 
The Bottom Line
If you believe that off-highway vehicle demand will improve, not to mention general industrial/machinery demand, Parker Hannifin could be back to a point where the shares are interesting again. I'm only looking for revenue growth of about 4% over the long term against 7% historical growth (of which, only about one-third has been organic), and I am looking for ongoing margin and cash conversion improvements to generate free cash flow growth in the mid-to-high single digits.
 
With that, I'm thinking fair value for Parker Hannifin is in the neighborhood of $110, even after this disappointing guidance. Likewise, EV/EBITDA and ROE/PBV suggest further upside from here. Although I think Parker's stock could be vulnerable to further pessimism regarding the global industrial economy, the stock is at the very least undervalued in a market where so few industrial stocks are.
 
Disclosure – At the time of writing, the author did not own shares of any company mentioned in this article.
 

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  3. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  5. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  6. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  9. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center