The sometimes questionable underwriting practices of subprime lenders such as Freemont General (NYSE: FMT), New Century Bancorp (Nasdaq: NCBC) and Accredited Home Lenders (Nasdaq: LEND) have been well documented in the media of late.

Lower interest rates are a tease for hawkers of variable or adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) who lure unsuspecting aspiring homeowners with dodgy credit to what often end up being usurious and consequently unsustainable arrangements for the mortgagors, resulting in the scourge of a lost home, even poorer credit or, worse, personal bankruptcy.

Falling home prices exacerbate this maelstrom. Loss mitigation efforts of the lender, whereby struggling borrowers are given reworked terms to forestall the inevitable, often are for naught.

The situation is analogous to a company's earnings quality. Workout terms are at times quite unconventional. Finance companies are feeling this and the public is not privy to the extent of the rot due to the lack of transparency in the process. What is difficult to know is whether or not the practice is predatory.

How The Seeds Are Sown
Subprime mortgages make up a small portion of the overall home finance market, but their growth in the past few years has been quite strong. Additionally, their role as a key ingredient in securitization is big business for Wall Street firms such as Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH) and Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC).

Couple this with the difficulties in valuing mortgage backed securities that hold these mortgages, the run-up in premium rates on credit derivatives that investment banks buy to lay off the risk of their fixed income holdings-almost one half is in mortgage backed securities -- and the pullback in residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) issuance and it is plan to see that investors' concerns are not misplaced.

Finally, investment banks such as Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), Bank of America (NYSE: BAC) and Deutsche Bank (NYSE: DB) that provide credit facilities for the mortgage lenders whose mortgage backed securities get repackaged are on the hook themselves. As well, certain fixed income mutual funds such as Regions Morgan Keegan Select High Income Fund and Legg Mason Partners Capital and Income Fund in some measure hold mortgage-related debt of these subprime lenders.

For now, it is difficult to gauge to what extent any contagion will be felt in the mortgage market as credit risk tends to play out more slowly over time. Were investors who had no idea that they might own such debt in their portfolios, such as pension funds holding complex derivatives such as collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), to discover to their chagrin that they did and were they to exit illiquid portfolios en masse, then capital markets could receive a nasty shock.

Possibly the only beneficiaries from recent events are hedge funds on the right side of trade (e.g. shorted subprime) and distressed debt buyers, and recent events such as these serve as an important reminder of times past.

Spare a Thought for 1989
What appears to be less well-documented in all of this is the cyclicality of financial progress, and one need only go back to the mid to late 1980s for perspective.

Fueled by a failure of public policy that resulted in deregulation, banks assumed greater investment risk, lending long and borrowing short, an asset-liability mismatch that resulted in a number of high profile failures of numerous savings and loan institutions. The rollover of nonperforming loans on the books of those thrifts magnified the crisis and the Resolution Trust Corp was established to sort out the mess.

Present day loss mitigation would seem to auger a similar outcome. Additionally, the markets practiced their own form of high risk underwriting in the form of high yield (junk bond) issuance as championed by the likes of firms such as Drexel Burnham Lambert. Private equity firms (buyout firms as they were formerly known) would arrange the purchase of publicly traded firms putting up only a small portion of the purchase price and employing leverage to finance the remainder.

The newly private companies, much as the present day encumbered homeowners, would struggle to operate under the weight of an indebtedness for which they proved to be no match. The architects of these arrangements, meanwhile, often made out rather well as the strictures of debt financing led them to invoke often extreme cost cutting measures to boost returns.

Examples of companies once caught up in the snare include grocer Safeway (NYSE: SWY) and the holding company of Canadian financier Robert Campeau who employed leverage in the acquisition of Allied Department Stores and Bloomingdale's.

It Can Happen To You
Excess is brought about by a catalyst. In the late 1980s, it was both financial deregulation and the perceived failure of the public markets to deliver value to many companies that led corporate managements to seek greater value and employment security away from such markets. It ended up often enough being a ruse.

Of late, eager home buyers, low interest rates and investors' inexorable appetite for yield have all figured prominently.

Caveat Emptor
It's a hackneyed phrase, yet one to which many homebuyers, prospective or otherwise, seem to have paid too little attention.

The desire of home ownership and a low interest rate environment fueled the ambitions of lenders to create products that would make the barely affordable or unaffordable, well, affordable...or not, as has frequently been the case.

Tulip mania, the South Sea bubble, speculation in the unfettered markets of the 1920s...the lessons seem to repeat themselves often enough, yet enough people fail to learn from them. Progress is as progress does and while it may be cyclical, it is progress nonetheless.

From the early corporate wreckage, high yield finance has evolved into a mainstream subset of fixed income. A desirable result of the current debacle would be greater and clearer disclosure to prospective customers and more prudent underwriting by the financial institutions.

As we await the outcome, we would do well to ponder where the fault line rests for the next market tumult and whether policy makers and investors will have enough foresight to see it off before it is too late. The answer is predictable enough.

Looking to cook up a market-stomping stock portfolio? Check out our FREE report "7 Ingredients to Market Beating Stocks" and get started right now!

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Stocks with Big Dividend Yields: 'It's a Trap!'

    Should you seek high yielding-dividend stocks in the current investment environment?
  2. Investing News

    Should You Be Betting with Buffett Right Now?

    Following Warren Buffett's stock picks has historically been a good strategy. Is considering his biggest holdings in 2016 a good idea?
  3. Products and Investments

    Cash vs. Stocks: How to Decide Which is Best

    Is it better to keep your money in cash or is a down market a good time to buy stocks at a lower cost?
  4. Investing News

    Who Does Cheap Oil Benefit? See This Stock (DG)

    Cheap oil won't benefit most companies, but this retailer might buck that trend.
  5. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Performance Review: Emerging Markets Equities in 2015

    Find out why emerging markets struggled in 2015 and why a half-decade long trend of poor returns is proving optimistic growth investors wrong.
  7. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
  8. Fundamental Analysis

    HF Performance Report: Did Hedge Funds Earn Their Fee in 2015?

    Find out whether hedge funds, which have come under tremendous pressure to improve their performance, managed to earn their fee in 2015.
  9. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is securitization?

    Securitization is the process of taking an illiquid asset, or group of assets, and through financial engineering, transforming ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Can hedge funds trade penny stocks?

    Hedge funds can trade penny stocks. In fact, hedge funds can trade in just about any type of security, including medium- ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Are hedge funds regulated by FINRA?

    Alternative investment vehicles such as hedge funds offer investors a wider range of possibilities due to certain exceptions ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Should mutual funds be subject to more regulation?

    Mutual funds, when compared to other types of pooled investments such as hedge funds, have very strict regulations. In fact, ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Can hedge fund returns be replicated?

    You can replicate hedge fund returns to a degree but not perfectly. Most replication strategies underperform hedge funds ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Can foreign investors invest in US hedge funds?

    U.S. hedge funds are open to accredited investors. When they distribute profits to investors, those proceeds are taxed at ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center