According to the U.S. Census Bureau, in 2004 the median household income in the United States was about $43,000. That equates to $117.81 a day, or $4.91 an hour for every hour of the day.

That's what's considered "normal".

Now consider the severance packages that some of these big name execs are getting, and what they are raking in during one year.

For example, when Home Depot's (HD) chief exec Bob Nardelli recently resigned, his door prize included $20 million in cash, the acceleration of unvested stock grants valued at $77 million, about $9 million in long-term incentive awards, retirement benefits valued at $32 million and a variety of other perks.

His total take? About $210 million. That equates to about $95,000 for each day (over roughly six years), and more than $3,900 per hour he was on the job. Not bad for a guy that presided over an essentially flat stock price!

Of course, Nardelli's pay package wasn't some sort of isolated event. Corporate America is flush with excess. Consider that:

Carly Fiorina, who worked at Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) for about 5 ½ years, netted a $21.38 million payout, which equates to $10,459 a day, or $435.83 an hour.

Philip Purcell, Morgan Stanley's (MS) ex chief exec raked in $43 million upon "retiring". That equates to about $14,726 a day over his eight years with the company (counting from when Morgan Stanley and Dean Witter merged), or roughly $613 per hour.

Jill Barad, Mattel's (MAT) chief executive landed $50 million upon her termination. That comes out to about $45,000 for every day she was at the helm. That's $1,902 an hour.

Viacom's (VIA) president, Mel Karmazin took in $35 million when he quit in June, 2004. His parting gift equates to about $23,972 for every day on the job, or $998 per hour.

Then there's Michael Ovitz, Disney's (DIS) ex president. Ovitz scored a $138 million golden parachute after just 14 months on the job. His total take equates to a mind-blowing $324,705 a day, or $13,529 an hour.

Still, some will say, "So what? They're worth it".

Oh really?

Fiorina will forever be linked with her company's corporate spying scandal. Purcell for nasty infighting with Morgan Stanley's board, and reaping a 45% increase while his firm's profits grew at about half that rate. Barad for presiding over a 50% plus decline in her company's share price. Karmazin for his well reported disagreements with Sumner Redstone, the lackluster stock price performance under his tenure and the persistent weakness of the company's Infinity radio division. Even Ovitz during his short time with Disney received a great deal of scrutiny for his inability to revive his company's struggling stock.

Of course to be fair, sometimes paying big bucks for a chief exec does pay off. Jack Welch is a terrific example. After all, he garnered a large majority of his estimated $720 million net worth heading up General Electric (GE). However, during his tenure he can also proudly point to the fact that GE's market capitalization increased by some $400 billion. So at least you can argue that he earned it.

Still, I prefer to look at Warren Buffett as an example. Heading up Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) he takes home an annual salary of just $100,000 a year and has lived in the same modest house that he bought in Omaha roughly 40 years ago for $31,500. Had you invested $10,000 in Berkshire in 1965 when Buffett took the helm, your bankroll would have grown to about $50 million.

The big lesson here folks is that paying up for a big name CEO rarely makes sense. Instead, look for companies that are run by individuals that either have money of their own (and work because they love it), or who have worked their way up through the ranks and have ample incentive to actually earn the big bucks.

When it comes to determining whether or not a CEO indeed has sufficient compensation incentives in place to truly work towards generating wealth for shareholders, this is no easy task. Executive pay packages can be quite complex, but it's in your interest as an investor to put in the time understanding you CEO's pay package (consider reading Lifting the Lid on CEO Compensation for a refresher on sizing up the incentives at work in an executive's compensation scheme).

As far as I can tell, the bottom line is that steep executive compensation seems to generate little more than flat share price performance.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
  2. Stock Analysis

    How to Find Quality Stocks Amid the Wreckage

    Finding companies with good earnings and hitting on all cylinders in this environment, although possible, is not easy.
  3. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  4. Stock Analysis

    If You Had Invested Right After Berkshire Hathaway's IPO (BRK.A)

    Learn how much you would now have if you had invested right after Berkshire Hathaway's IPO, and find out the classes of shares that you could invest in.
  5. Economics

    How Warren Buffett Made Berkshire A Winner

    Berkshire Fine Spinning Associated and Hathaway Manufacturing Company merged in 1955 to form Berkshire Hathaway.
  6. Investing News

    What Does the Fire Monkey Mean for Your Portfolio?

    The Chinese new year this year corresponds to the monkey, a quick-witted, playful, tricky figure that means well but has a penchant for causing trouble.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  8. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  10. Retirement

    Warren Buffett's Investment Lessons for Retirees

    For those in retirement, Warren Buffett's clear, timeless advice on investing is worth a look.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How does a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) affect my salary?

    Some companies build salary adjustments into their compensation structures to offset the effects of inflation on their employees. ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Does working capital include salaries?

    A company accrues unpaid salaries on its balance sheet as part of accounts payable, which is a current liability account, ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Do financial advisors need to meet quotas?

    Most financial advisors are required to meet quotas, particularly if they work for firms that pay base salaries or draws ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center