Open mouth, insert foot.
Just a couple of weeks ago, I opined that Starbucks' (Nasdaq: SBUX) aggressive plan to add stores over the long haul was a good thing.
But that was then, and this is now.
In fact, some more details are starting to come out about management's aggressive growth plans, and I'm not sure I like what I'm hearing.
According to Starbucks' chairman Howard Schultz, the company expects to open at least 10,000 stores over the next four years.
Folks that's worrisome to say the least.
There are a couple of reasons. First, it's taken Starbucks what, like 20 years to open just over 13,000 locations? And now in just 4 short years it's going to almost double in size?
Frankly, I think that there could be a couple of problems with that equation. Seriously, what happens if:
• The economy slows during this growth phase and the company is stuck in some lousy leases?
• Existing same store sales start to wane? After all, it costs a lot of money to secure new leases and start up new locations. That dough is going to have to come from somewhere.
• Large dilutive financings will be needed to finance these locations?
You see, when I penned my last article I was aware that management had said that its goal over the long haul was to have 40,000 stores under its belt. But 10,000 in the next couple of years?
I can feel my blood pressure rising just thinking about it!
An Example of What Can Happen if a Company Grows Too Fast
The one company that comes to mind when I think about "hyper growth" such as this is a company called Manhattan Bagel. Do you remember those guys? They still exist, although primarily in the northeast -- and under different ownership. Well anyway, back in the mid 1990s before the whole "low carb" thing, they were all the rage.
I remember it like it was yesterday -- the company was opening stores left and right. It made a huge west coast acquisition. Wall Street thought the company couldn't be stopped. In some circles comparisons were already being made with McDonald's (NYSE: MCD), and Yum! Brands (NYSE: YUM).
Then the problems began. The company was having some issues financing its growth. In fact, it had serious problems.
Long story short, in spite of the exponential growth in its store base each year, it was losing money. It was ultimately forced to close a number of stores in order to stay afloat. But it was too little too late. Its shareholders essentially got nothing as the chain filed for bankruptcy protection in November of 1997. (For the record, under new ownership the stores are much better run.)
Now I'm not suggesting that Starbucks and Manhattan Bagel are in the same boat. In fact, I think that Starbucks has a solid management team, and it certainly has a longer operating history and deeper pockets then Manhattan Bagel ever had.
But again, I just can't get that story out of my mind. To this day I think back to that example of how hyper growth and a "sure thing" can go bad real fast. For the record, I got burned on that one -- personally. And I mean big time.
The good news is that my loss taught me a lesson. To be wary of companies that want to grow at a break neck clip.
What Starbucks Needs To Do
Anyway, I think that management at Starbucks will need to clarify how it plans to finance that growth as well as what metrics should be used to gauge the success of new store openings. I also think that management will need to prove to investors that the company can show solid same store sales growth, and can generate meaningful profits (even while taking on such a huge financial burden) before I wholeheartedly buy into this new fangled plan. After all saying you plan to double in size is one thing. Doing it is another thing altogether.
Again, prove to me it's doable.
The Bottom Line
I'm still bullish on Starbucks because I think it's a great concept. But with hyper growth comes enormous risk, and investors need to be fully aware of that.
Looking to cook up a market-stomping stock portfolio? Check out our FREE report "7 Ingredients to Market Beating Stocks" and get started right now!
Stock AnalysisStuck on oil? Take a look at these six stocks—three that present risk vs. three that offer some resiliency.
EconomicsEmerging markets have been hammered lately, but these three countries (and their large and young populations) are worth monitoring.
Stock AnalysisPepsiCo has long been known as one of the most resilient stocks throughout the broader market. Is this still the case today?
InvestingHow do bond exchange traded fund (ETF) distributions work? It’s a question I get a lot. First, let’s explain what we mean by distributions.
Stock AnalysisThese three stocks are resilient, fundamentally sound and also pay generous dividends.
Investing NewsAre stocks cheap right now? Be wary of those who are telling you what you want to hear. Here's why.
Investing NewsHere are four stocks that offer good value and will likely outperform the majority of stocks throughout the broader market over the next several years.
Investing NewsHere are three resilient, dividend-paying companies that may mitigate some worry in an uncertain investing environment.
Stock AnalysisIf you're not sure where Ford and General Motors are going, you might want to look at this auto investment option instead.
Mutual Funds & ETFsExplore detailed analyses of the top buy-and-hold exchange traded funds, and learn about their characteristics, statistics and suitability.
When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>