When financial media giant Thomson-Reuters (NYSE:TRI) reported better-than-expected third quarter results last week, investors quickly bid the shares up by 12% convinced that the evidence was now in that the newly merged entity had the appropriate level of diversification to get through the downturn in its primary markets, the financial services industry, relatively unscathed.

CEO Plays Up Positive Outlook
That conviction was further bolstered when CEO Tom Glocer suggested in a conference call, that its sales to the financial services market could still rise next year, even as the company's client base shrinks. While he declined to give a specific number, he didn't rule out the possibility that the company's financial services products division could produce positive sales in the coming year; a surprising level of optimism in light of the fact that organic revenue growth for this division, which accounts for 60% of sales, decelerated to 5% during the latest quarter, compared with the 7% and 9% rates realized in the two previous quarters.

Is such conviction grounded in facts, or like most hard pressed CEOs these days, is Glover simply "whistling through the graveyard" in the face of truly scary prospects for his and other companies relying on the health of the financial services sector for the lion's share of their revenues and profits?

Merger Move Was a Defensive Play
Formed last April as a result of the acquisition of legendary British financial news service Reuters Group plc by Canadian media company Thomson Corp for $15.9 billion, the deal produced an entity that, while still heavily depended on the financial services markets, now gets about 40% of its revenues from the provision of data to the legal, scientific, healthcare and accounting businesses; areas that are largely resilient to the ups and downs of economic cycles. The benefit of this sort of diversification obviously wasn't lost on Reuters shareholders who saw their shares collapse for 16 pounds to under 1 pound in London trading during the 2001-2004 downturn when revenue for Thomson Reuters financial services unit dropped 18% on a 10% drop in staffing levels in the financial industry according to numbers compiled by UBS analyst Jeff Fan. (For more on mergers, be sure to check out our Mergers And Acquisitions Tutorial.)

Financial Sector Bracing For More Layoffs
While this new entity is unquestionably a different animal from the standalone Reuters of the past, which relied on the financial services sector for 90% of its revenue, the financial industry now looks set to take a much bigger hit than at any time in the post-war era. In a recent Reuters interview, top ranked financial industry analyst Meredith Whitney of Oppenheimer & Co re-iterated her earlier forecast that Wall Street would cut 25-30% of its workforce between January of this year and March of 2009. So far, job losses in the investment banking sector are estimated at 15-20% and banks worldwide have let go about 150,000 of their staff. And industry executives still expect more lay-offs in the coming months.

Those expectations are already becoming reality. Last week, Citigroup (NYSE:C) announced that it was slashing its headcount by 52,000. Earlier, Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) let go 3,200 employees, or 10% of its global workforce, and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) reduced its institutional securities and money management staff levels by 10% and 9% respectively. And JPMorgan & Chase (NYSE:JPM) recently hinted that 40,000 financial industry jobs could disappear this year in London alone. All this means that they'll be a lot fewer occupied desks out there on which a Reuters, or for that matter, a Bloomberg terminal will be placed.

The Final Word
Despite the fact that the shares are down by about one-third from their value at the time of last April's merger, it's hard to buy into the notion that all the potential bad news is already priced into the stock. While such a view recently prompted RBS Research to change its call on the stock to 'hold' from 'sell', it may be a tad too early to get back into this sector, given the tsunami of financial industry job losses now on the way.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  3. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  5. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  6. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  9. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center