Over 20 years ago, I dated a girl whose father owned a medium-sized juice company. This man did everything possible for his employees including lending them money for house down payments, yet local union representatives unilaterally decided his employees weren't being treated fairly. In the end, workers realized the man who had run the business successfully for more than 30 years knew more about employee relations than the union reps, and the move to unionize died a quiet death.

Today, the same kind of misinformation is out there, and investors should think twice about making bets on companies with a significant number of unionized employees. The risks, in my opinion, are just too great. (Read more about the pros and cons of unions in Unions: Do They Help Or Hurt Workers?)

IN PICTURES: Eight Ways To Survive A Market Downturn
Who Can You Trust?
Current negotiations between Chrysler and the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) are tense. Chrysler insists a $20-an-hour cut to its labor costs is critical to plants staying open north of the border. CAW President Ken Lewenza doesn't agree. He maintains that labor represents only 7% of the total cost of making a car, and that Chrysler's real problems lie elsewhere. While Chrysler does have a laundry list of concerns, he is being quite loose with the facts, and I'll explain by using General Motors (NYSE:GM) as an example since all of the big three U.S. automakers have relatively similar cost structures.

In 2008, GM's automotive cost of sales was $149.7 billion, approximately $2 billion more than its automotive sales. Of those costs, $50.1 billion are structural, which are defined as "...expenses that do not generally vary with production and are recorded in both automotive cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense. Such costs include manufacturing labor, pension and OPEB costs, engineering expense and marketing-related costs." About $12 billion of the structural costs are SG&A expenses and likely relate to the head office. This leaves $38.1 billion for automotive cost of sales.

If the CAW's 7% figure is to be believed, then labor costs should amount to $10.5 billion (7% of $149.7 billion), which is only 20% of GM's total structural costs. I find that very hard to swallow. According to Tony Faria, co-director at the University of Windsor's automotive research center, Honda's (NYSE:HMC) and Toyota's (NYSE:TM) labor cost (including pensions and benefits) is $30 lower than Chrysler's $76.14 an hour. Someone's stretching the truth, and I doubt it's the professor.

Sucking And Blowing
Just over 16 million Americans are union members, accounting for 12.4% of employed and salaried workers. According to the Department of Labor, the average weekly earnings of a unionized employee is nearly $200 more than a non-unionized one. Organized labor believes that new legislation such as the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) will give workers a better opportunity to join the union movement. Opponents feel it's nothing more than pressure tactics on non-unionized employees. Frankly if you take out the public sector, unions are practically irrelevant, representing just 7.8% of the private sector workforce.

More concerning is the influence unions have through their pension funds. A study done by New YorkUniversity professor Ashwini Agarwal found that AFL-CIO (the central federation of labor unions in the U.S.) affiliated pension fund assets total $100 billion, with 46% invested in domestic equities (as of September 30, 2006). In 2006, union-related funds were responsible for 295 out of 699 shareholder proposals. It also found that AFL-CIO funds became much less combative when the union no longer represented a company's employees.

I'd think twice about investing in a company unduly influenced by union-sponsored shareholder activism. Further, if you have a union pension, take a closer look at the investments. You can bet they're playing retired workers against the current workers in a sophisticated game of chicken. Don't let it happen.

Bottom Line
Unions increasingly find themselves in a conflict of interest today. In my opinion, you should avoid union-run shops at all costs. If you must, I'd consider the State Street IAM fund (SIAMX), where 80% of holdings are companies represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. (Read Don't Judge An Index Fund By Its Cover to learn how these funds do not always match index returns.)

State Street IAM Fund (SIAMX) Top 5 Holdings

Company Weight
Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) 4.99%
AT&T (NYSE:T) 2.14%
Chevron (NYSE:CVX) 2.12%
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) 2.11%
Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) 2.07%
Data as of 03/31/2009
Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center