If you're paying attention to the bank bailouts, you are probably familiar with the government-imposed provision that requires that companies receiving aid under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) limit annual salaries paid to top-five executives to $500,000 each. Any company wishing to compensate its executives above that ceiling must use restricted stock grants that vest only after the government is repaid. There are other conditions attached to the bailout funds, but CEO compensation is the biggest lightning rod for taxpayers - and who can blame them? In a January 29 press conference, President Obama described the bankers' pay in 2008 as "shameful". Personally I liked Joe Biden's line best.
"I'd like to throw these guys in the brig," he said in a January 29 interview with CNBC and The New York Times.
Who wouldn't? But a salary cap isn't the answer. (To learn more about shameful CEO practices, be sure to read Pages From The Bad CEO Playbook.)
IN PICTURES: 10 Biggest Losers In Finance
How We Got Here
In 1993, Congress introduced a $1 million cap on CEO salary deductibility, leading to the stock option mess we have today. According to the Conference Board's 2008 report on top executive compensation, 2007 saw a move away from cash compensation and toward performance-based stock compensation. Even with this change, two-thirds of the industries sampled for the report upped their cash payments to CEOs in the fiscal year. The big winner in all of this was insurance executives, who received a 34.4% increase.
I guess insurance pays after all.
The report goes on to suggest that the CEOs of the largest 10% of companies in the sample held stock and stock options worth 100 times their salaries. As I've said before, I'd be impressed with this figure if I knew these wonderful citizens borrowed funds to buy the stock on the open market. Sadly, we know this isn't the case.
Cap? What Cap?
If I were a higher-up in a leading financial institution today, I'd be licking my chops at the opportunity to take the helm at a bank turnaround. The upside potential of larger-than-normal performance-based stock option packages is astronomical. A $500,000 salary cap isn't much of a deterrent when the opportunity exists to make one of the biggest financial scores in banking history. I can't see how you could turn down an offer, knowing your employment agreement will be laced with stock options and grants to make up for the lack of salary. Sure, you'll have to wait until the job is successfully completed, but isn't that always the case? All a banker needs to do is right the ship and the pot of gold is his.
To illustrate why the salary cap makes little sense, I'll examine five companies (2007 fiscal year) with similar revenues, all operating consumer goods businesses. I think you'll find the way in which CEOs are paid today provides bankers little doubt they'll receive more than enough compensation down the road. So where's the downside? Anyone capable of running a major bank has surely amassed enough wealth to get by on $500,000 for a couple of years. This piece of the bailout sounds good but changes little.
CEO Compensation – 2007 Fiscal Year
|Company||Revenue Growth||Pretax Income Growth||Stock Appreciation||Total Comp.||% Long-Term Comp.|
|Wolverine World Wide
With the exception of Carter's, each of the above companies provided its CEO with more than half his or her total annual compensation in the form of long-term performance incentives, including cash, stock options, stock grants and restricted stock units. Because of the $1 million deductibility limit set by the Treasury, companies have little choice but to back-end executive pay. For shareholders sake, I hope they revisit this. In the end, it's doing more harm than good.
Stock AnalysisA summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
Credit & LoansThese terms may sound the same, but they mean very different things for homebuyers.
Options & FuturesInvesting during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
InsuranceTough times call for desperate measures, but is raiding your life insurance policy even worth considering?
Personal FinanceLearn 10 good reasons for switching jobs, such as major life changes, ethical concerns, job description creep and upwards mobility.
Investing BasicsHeld onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
Fundamental AnalysisA decision tree provides a comprehensive framework to review the alternative scenarios and consequences a decision may lead to.
EconomicsWill remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
Stock AnalysisIs DKS a bargain here?
Investing NewsA third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
With the growth in the size and number of hedge funds over the past decade, the interest in how these funds go about generating ... Read Full Answer >>
A company accrues unpaid salaries on its balance sheet as part of accounts payable, which is a current liability account, ... Read Full Answer >>
Most financial advisors are required to meet quotas, particularly if they work for firms that pay base salaries or draws ... Read Full Answer >>
Mutual funds invest in not only stocks and fixed-income securities but also options and futures. There exists a separate ... Read Full Answer >>
When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>