McGillUniversity professor Henry Mintzberg wrote a great article November 30 in the Wall Street Journal suggesting big public companies shouldn't pay executive bonuses. It was as if the professor was reading my mind. Especially the part where Mintzberg says, "Eliminate bonuses. Period. Pay people, including the CEO, fairly. As an executive, if you want a bonus, buy the stock, like everyone else. Bet on your company for real, personally." I've been preaching this going on two years now. Despite an abundance of evidence that these bonuses do little for a company's fortune, corporate boards continue to dole them out like candy. Reading the comments online about Mintzberg's article tend to paint the man as some sort of "Commie Pinko." The fact is he's spot on and I'm going to demonstrate this fact using Forbes' annual list of CEO compensation. Maybe then, investors will realize how silly their silent acceptance of this abhorrent practice really is.
Forbes' annual list of CEO compensation has an efficiency rating, which takes into account the six-year return of a company's stock in relation to its CEO's total compensation over the past five years. The lower the better. Number one on the list in 2008 was Terra Industries (NYSE:TRA) CEO Michael Bennett, who made $20.78 million in the past five years while his company's stock has increased 386% and stands to appreciate further as it fights off an unwanted advance from CF Industries (NYSE:CF). Last on the list at 179th is none other than embattled, soon-to-be gone Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) CEO Ken Lewis. His pay over the last five years was $147.5 million while his company's stock lost 66% its value. Are you convinced yet? Don't worry, there's more.
Top Five CEOs
|Company||CEO Pay - Past 5 Years||5-Year Return to Dec. 2/09|
|Terra Industries (NYSE:TRA)||$20.78M||386%|
|C.H. Robinson Worldwide (Nasdaq:CHRW)||$28.22M||113%|
|Reliance Steel (NYSE:RS)||$18.17M||107%|
Below Average Compensation
Without getting into the specifics of each CEOs pay package, most non-founder executives receive at least half of their total annual compensation in stock grants and awards. Take Michael Bennett for example. Terra lists his total compensation in 2008 as $5.4 million, but Forbes goes with $10.47 million. This is because Terra's expense is the lower figure while Forbes' higher number is what he actually made from those awards. Even for reasonably paid executives like Bennett, these awards end up being the gift that keeps on giving, and that's where Mintzberg sees a problem. A better solution would have been to pay Bennett $4 million a year for the past five years' service with no bonuses and a provision in his contract to be able to issue a one-time gift of stock (board approved of course) should he leave on good terms, regardless of the reason. We tip handsomely for good service. Why shouldn't we do the same for a job well done? The worst case scenario: A CEO leaves early, cashes in on his or her exit pay and the company finds another person to head up the company knowing the previous person left the company in excellent condition.
Bottom Five CEOs
|Company||CEO Pay - Past 5 Years||5-Year Return to Dec. 2/09|
|Bank of America (NYSE:BAC)||$147.50M||(66%)|
|General Electric (NYSE:GE)||$70.93M||(55%)|
|Hartford Financial Services (NYSE:HIG)||$77.86M||(62%)|
|Boston Scientific (NYSE:BSX)||$49.11M||(76%)|
Above Average Compensation
Only one of five (Haliburton CEO David Lesar) on this list of infamy was able to deliver any shareholder value, generating a 50% return versus negative 7% for the S&P 500. That's the good news. The bad is almost any executive worth his salt could have done what Mr. Lesar did. I would bet all my worldly possessions that if you paid one of the men on the first list half the $117.6 million that Lesar earned over the past five years, they would have delivered greater returns. Mintzberg's article explains why this is the case. It's because compensation is the last thing that should drive true leaders. If you have to throw excessive amounts of compensation at someone, their greed will get in the way of good judgment. That's just human nature.
Overpaid executives across this country are cringing at the thought Henry Mintzberg is on to something. Unfortunately, most investors aren't that smart. We'll continue to believe that CEOs alone make or break a company's future and that the thousands of employees that execute the top dog's vision (or lack thereof) are simply cogs in a wheel. I sure hope not. (For additional reading, check out Evaluating Executive Compensation)
Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!
Mutual Funds & ETFsLearn about arbitrage funds and how this type of investment generates profits by taking advantage of price differentials between the cash and futures markets.
Investing NewsWill Ferrari's shares move fast off the line only to sputter later?
Stock AnalysisHere are five stocks that pay safe dividends and should be at least somewhat resilient to a bear market.
InvestingThe further you fall, the harder it is to climb back up. It’s a universal truth that is painfully apparent in the investing world.
Fundamental AnalysisOptions market trading data can provide important insights about the direction of stocks and the overall market. Here’s how to track it.
Stock AnalysisCan these two oil stocks buck the trend?
Investing NewsAlcoa plans to split into two companies. Is this a bullish catalyst for investors?
Stock AnalysisIf you want to buck the bear market trend by going long on consumer stocks, these three might be your best bets.
Investing NewsA rate hike would certainly alter the investment scene, but would it be for the better or worse?
Investing NewsWith market volatility high, you may think it is time to run for corporate bonds instead of stocks. Before you do take a deeper look into which is better.
When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>