The banking sector keeps hitting new lows every day, led by Citigroup (NYSE:C) and Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), as rumors continue to sweep the market that the government will nationalize two of the largest banks in the world and wipe out stakeholders. Can the government do this? And would it work if it did? What would come next? Nationalization probably wouldn't solve our financial crisis.

Eight Ways To Survive A Market Downturn

The word "nationalization" itself conjures up images of the tired old stereotype of the leader of a Banana Republic seizing Yankee property and chasing the imperialists out of the country at gunpoint. Unfortunately for the U.S. financial system, this is not the United Fruit Company and Guatemala, or Fidel Castro marching into Havana on New Year's Day in 1959.

Can The Government Do It?
Absolutely. The two institutions are bank holding companies that, depending on their charters, are regulated by either the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the Federal Reserve. The government could nationalize the banks officially by seizing them late on a Friday evening, which the FDIC has done many times over the last year. Alternatively, it could do it unofficially by browbeating management to take more dilutive capital infusions, or by setting up a conservatorship in the manner of Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE). Either way, equity and bond holders would be wiped out. (To learn more about the FDIC, be sure to read our related article The History Of The FDIC.)

Would It Work?
This is a more difficult question, because I am not sure what would be accomplished by nationalization. The so-called toxic assets would still be on the balance sheet of some entity, whether it's the government or the private sector. If the government did a typical bank seizure, it would try to sell the deposit base and the loan assets to another institution. Due to the size involved, this may not even be possible. The government would be stuck with billions of dollars in non-performing loans and billions more in toxic securities. When the government sells these at fire sale prices, imagine how badly that would make other financial institutions mark down their security portfolios.

What Would Come Next?
Right behind these two institutions are two other large banks, Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) and JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM). Wells Fargo bought Wachovia, so some issues are probably lurking there, and while Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan established a reputation for managing his institution the best during the crisis so far, the bank is not immune from the issues facing the rest of the industry. It also has toxic assets and deteriorating loan asset quality. So, once the Obama administration panders to the market and feeds it the carcasses of Citigroup and Bank of America, why stop there? Should it throw the next two banks to the market to be torn apart? Why not the entire banking system? Perhaps the president should realize that the market is not a God, and as a value investor would say, it is irrational in the short term.

Managements of both Citigroup and Bank of America tried to downplay the nationalization talk. Citigroup cited its high Tier 1 capital of 11.9%, and Ken Lewis, the CEO at Bank of America, said the talk "is based on a lack of understanding of our bank's financial position as well as a lack of appreciation for the adverse ramifications for our customers and the economy".

Nationalization Is Not A Panacea
However the situation resolves itself, it is clear that the financial crisis has a long way to go, and the new administration was not the panacea that everyone thought it might be. Neither is nationalization.

To learn more about the financial crisis and what you can do to make it through, check out our Financial Crisis Survival Guide Special Feature.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    8 Solid Utility Stocks for a Bear Market

    If you're seeking modest appreciation, generous dividend payments and resiliency, consider these eight utility stocks.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Why Phillips 66 (PSX) is a Solid Long-Term Bet

    Here's why Phillips 66 will likely remain one of the world’s largest and most profitable companies for a long time to come.
  3. Stock Analysis

    3 Resilient Oil Stocks for a Down Market

    Stuck on oil? Take a look at these six stocks—three that present risk vs. three that offer some resiliency.
  4. Economics

    Keep an Eye on These Emerging Economies

    Emerging markets have been hammered lately, but these three countries (and their large and young populations) are worth monitoring.
  5. Stock Analysis

    Is Pepsi (PEP) Still a Safe Bet?

    PepsiCo has long been known as one of the most resilient stocks throughout the broader market. Is this still the case today?
  6. Investing

    The ABCs of Bond ETF Distributions

    How do bond exchange traded fund (ETF) distributions work? It’s a question I get a lot. First, let’s explain what we mean by distributions.
  7. Stock Analysis

    3 Stocks that Are Top Bets for Retirement

    These three stocks are resilient, fundamentally sound and also pay generous dividends.
  8. Investing News

    Are Stocks Cheap Now? Nope. And Here's Why

    Are stocks cheap right now? Be wary of those who are telling you what you want to hear. Here's why.
  9. Investing News

    4 Value Stocks Worth Your Immediate Attention

    Here are four stocks that offer good value and will likely outperform the majority of stocks throughout the broader market over the next several years.
  10. Investing News

    These 3 High-Quality Stocks Are Dividend Royalty

    Here are three resilient, dividend-paying companies that may mitigate some worry in an uncertain investing environment.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!