The banking sector keeps hitting new lows every day, led by Citigroup (NYSE:C) and Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), as rumors continue to sweep the market that the government will nationalize two of the largest banks in the world and wipe out stakeholders. Can the government do this? And would it work if it did? What would come next? Nationalization probably wouldn't solve our financial crisis.


IN PICTURES:
Eight Ways To Survive A Market Downturn

The word "nationalization" itself conjures up images of the tired old stereotype of the leader of a Banana Republic seizing Yankee property and chasing the imperialists out of the country at gunpoint. Unfortunately for the U.S. financial system, this is not the United Fruit Company and Guatemala, or Fidel Castro marching into Havana on New Year's Day in 1959.

Can The Government Do It?
Absolutely. The two institutions are bank holding companies that, depending on their charters, are regulated by either the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) or the Federal Reserve. The government could nationalize the banks officially by seizing them late on a Friday evening, which the FDIC has done many times over the last year. Alternatively, it could do it unofficially by browbeating management to take more dilutive capital infusions, or by setting up a conservatorship in the manner of Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM) and Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE). Either way, equity and bond holders would be wiped out. (To learn more about the FDIC, be sure to read our related article The History Of The FDIC.)

Would It Work?
This is a more difficult question, because I am not sure what would be accomplished by nationalization. The so-called toxic assets would still be on the balance sheet of some entity, whether it's the government or the private sector. If the government did a typical bank seizure, it would try to sell the deposit base and the loan assets to another institution. Due to the size involved, this may not even be possible. The government would be stuck with billions of dollars in non-performing loans and billions more in toxic securities. When the government sells these at fire sale prices, imagine how badly that would make other financial institutions mark down their security portfolios.

What Would Come Next?
Right behind these two institutions are two other large banks, Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) and JP Morgan (NYSE:JPM). Wells Fargo bought Wachovia, so some issues are probably lurking there, and while Jamie Dimon at JP Morgan established a reputation for managing his institution the best during the crisis so far, the bank is not immune from the issues facing the rest of the industry. It also has toxic assets and deteriorating loan asset quality. So, once the Obama administration panders to the market and feeds it the carcasses of Citigroup and Bank of America, why stop there? Should it throw the next two banks to the market to be torn apart? Why not the entire banking system? Perhaps the president should realize that the market is not a God, and as a value investor would say, it is irrational in the short term.

Managements of both Citigroup and Bank of America tried to downplay the nationalization talk. Citigroup cited its high Tier 1 capital of 11.9%, and Ken Lewis, the CEO at Bank of America, said the talk "is based on a lack of understanding of our bank's financial position as well as a lack of appreciation for the adverse ramifications for our customers and the economy".

Nationalization Is Not A Panacea
However the situation resolves itself, it is clear that the financial crisis has a long way to go, and the new administration was not the panacea that everyone thought it might be. Neither is nationalization.

To learn more about the financial crisis and what you can do to make it through, check out our Financial Crisis Survival Guide Special Feature.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Net Neutrality: Pros and Cons

    The fight over net neutrality has become an amazing spectacle. But at its core, it's yet another skirmish in cable television's war to remain relevant.
  2. Personal Finance

    A Day in the Life of an Equity Research Analyst

    What does an equity research analyst do on an everyday basis?
  3. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: PowerShares S&P 500 Downside Hedged

    Find out about the PowerShares S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF, and learn detailed information about characteristics, suitability and recommendations of it.
  4. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: ProShares Large Cap Core Plus

    Learn information about the ProShares Large Cap Core Plus ETF, and explore detailed analysis of its characteristics, suitability and recommendations.
  5. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares Core Growth Allocation

    Find out about the iShares Core Growth Allocation Fund, and learn detailed information about its characteristics, suitability and recommendations.
  6. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility

    Learn about the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility exchange-traded fund, which invests in low-volatility equities traded on the U.S. stock market.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Should You Follow Millionaires into This Sector?

    Millionaire investors—and those who follow them—should take another look at the current economic situation before making any more investment decisions.
  8. Professionals

    What to do During a Market Correction

    The market has corrected...now what? Here's what you should consider rather than panicking.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: Vanguard Mid-Cap Value

    Take an in-depth look at the Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF, one of the largest and most popular mid-cap funds in the U.S. equity space.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    ETF Analysis: Schwab US Broad Market

    Take an in-depth look at the Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF, an incredibly low-cost fund based on a wide selection of the U.S. equity market.
RELATED TERMS
  1. Equity

    The value of an asset less the value of all liabilities on that ...
  2. Hard-To-Sell Asset

    An asset that is extremely difficult to dispose of either due ...
  3. Sucker Yield

    When an investor has essentially risked all of his capital for ...
  4. PT (Perseroan Terbatas)

    An acronym for Perseroan Terbatas, which is Limited Liability ...
  5. Ltd. (Limited)

    An abbreviation of "limited," Ltd. is a suffix that ...
  6. BHD (Berhad)

    The suffix Bhd. is an abbreviation of a Malay word "berhad," ...
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What happens to the shares of stock purchased in a tender offer?

    The shares of stock purchased in a tender offer become the property of the purchaser. From that point forward, the purchaser, ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center
×

You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!