For the past several years, I've held the contrarian belief that Canadian and American companies doing business in North America should manufacture closer to home. For me, it comes down to being more responsive to your customers' needs. We've become a society focused on cheap price, and only now consumers are realizing this comes at a price. Manufacturing jobs have moved to Asia by the millions, replaced by lower-paying positions in the service industry. Walmart (NYSE: WMT) argues that saving you money lets you live better. Those on the other side of the argument believe savings in one hand have come at the expense of wages in the other. Who is correct is likely unanswerable. What I do know is that making products thousands of miles away is about as sensible as driving all the way across town to save 5 cents a gallon for gas. I believe "Made in the U.S.A." wins. Here are my reasons why:

IN PICTURES: 10 Tips For The Successful Long-Term Investor

Wages Heading Higher

In 10 years, Chinese wages have risen from $1,000 annually to $3,900. Credit Suisse (NYSE: CS) believes U.S. companies doing business in China will face lower margins in the coming months due to rising wages. Price increases, the usual remedy for rising costs, won't be absorbed by consumers. In an effort to keep input costs low, some manufacturers will move production to low-cost locations like Vietnam or Bangladesh. Others like General Electric (NYSE: GE) will opt to bring it home, as is the case with its hybrid water heater that will now be made in Kentucky rather than China. Let's face it, if wages in Asia were similar to those in the U.S., we wouldn't be having this discussion. Eventually, they could be.

Wage-Equalization Import Taxes

Canadian billionaire and money manager Stephen Jarislowsky believes free trade is a good thing, but only if all countries involved are operating on a level playing field. Until wages in China and the U.S. are closer, an unfair advantage exists. One solution is to revalue the Yuan, an idea that doesn't seem likely. Another is to adjust wages in the U.S. downward, also unlikely. This leaves Jarislowsky's suggestion that Canada and the U.S. should implement a wage-equalization import tax, which hits low-wage countries like China while simultaneously creating jobs here in North America. Once this occurs, wages in China will rise, as there won't be an incentive to keep them low. Everyone wins. I believe he's right.

American-Made Craftsmanship

Up until a few years ago, this meant something good. Then shareholder profits became the focus, and quality went out the window. The Japanese didn't necessarily get that much better; America just got that much worse. I've owned two Jeeps (including my existing SUV) in my life, and they've both been excellent vehicles. A recent ad for the new 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee trumpets, "Made in the U.S.A.", not because it's manufactured at the Jefferson North plant in Detroit, but because Americans know how to make things. Examples of companies with products made almost exclusively in the U.S. include Intuitive Surgical's (Nasdaq: ISRG) da Vinci surgical system, True Religion Brand Jeans (Nasdaq: TRLG) premium denim, Arctic Cat (Nasdaq: ACAT) snowmobiles and Burt's Bees (a division of Clorox (NYSE: CLX) personal care products. It's a small list but growing.

Canadian Beer

Americans see Canada as the land of hockey and beer. Interestingly, up until 1992, beer brewed in one province could not be sold in another. This ensured breweries and the jobs that came with them existed in every province. According to the Fraser Institute, this raised the cost of beer. That's true, but it also likely meant the product was fresher. While we can't go back to the days of protectionism, it does seem possible through legislation like the Manufacturing Enhancement Act to provide American businesses with reasons to manufacture in the U.S. Implementing tax breaks for companies who do so, and then taxing imports from low-wage countries, are two ways to revive manufacturing in this country. A third is to get tough with countries such as Japan that seriously restrict the sale of certain imports (cars in their case) considered vital to the country's economic interests. Free trade must be fair trade.

Bottom Line

I believe "Made in the U.S.A." will win because it's practical. A.O. Smith (NYSE: AOS) manufactures tankless water heaters in the U.S., China, India and elsewhere. As far as I can tell, much of what it manufactures in the U.S. is sold in the U.S., and what is made in China is sold in China and so on. It's not unlike the Canadian beer example above but on a country-by-country basis. In my opinion, this is the only form of globalization that's sustainable and beneficial to all. (For more, see The Basics Of Tariffs And Trade Barriers.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Will J.C. Penney Come Back in 2016? (JCP)

    J.C. Penney is without a doubt turning itself around, but that doesn't guarantee the stock will respond immediately.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  3. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  4. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  5. Economics

    Is Wall Street Living in Denial?

    Will remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
  6. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  7. Investing News

    How AT&T Evolved into a Mobile Phone Giant

    A third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Yelp: Can it Regain its Losses in 2016? (YELP)

    Yelp investors have had reason to be happy recently. Will the good spirits last?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center