Many serious investors are becoming familiar with Joel Greenblatt's "Magic Formula," where he takes the earnings yield and return on capital for a group of stocks, ranks them from best (ranked #1) to worst and then adds the two numbers together. The lower a company's combined score, the better. When it comes to screening stocks, this kind of exercise is great because it combines more than one attribute, allowing for a little wiggle room.

IN PICTURES: Learn To Invest In 10 Steps

For example, just because a stock's price-to-sales ratio is above the industry average, doesn't mean it isn't a good buy. To illustrate this point, here are the largest processed and packaged goods companies analyzed using forward price-to-earnings, price-to-book, price-to-sales and price-to-cash flow as screening criteria. While it isn't perfect, the "Magic Formula" serves a useful purpose.

Top 10 U.S. Processed and Packaged Goods Companies

Combined My Formula Score Magic Formula Score Combined Score
Campbell Soup (NYSE:CPB) 21 2 23
Ralcorp (NYSE:RAH) 11 13 24
Con Agra (NYSE:CAG) 9 16 25
Sara Lee (NYSE:SLE) 13 15 28
McCormick & Company (NYSE:MKC) 24 5 29
Kellogg (NYSE:K) 26 6 32
JM Smucker (NYSE:SJM) 18 15 33
General Mills (NYSE:GIS) 26 9 35
Pepsico (NYSE:PEP) 29 9 38
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters (Nasdaq:GMCR) 38 19 57

We Have A Winner
Campbell Soup came out on top when combining my formula, which tends to favor value-oriented stocks, with Greenblatt's "Magic Formula," which favors those with strong earnings. While one of Greenblatt's two criteria is return on invested capital, I tend to favor the cash return on invested capital (CROIC) instead because it gives a better idea of a company's cash generation from operations. The higher the return the better.

In Campbell Soup's case, it came out on top at 18.5% with Pepsico second at 17.1% and McCormick & Company third at 13%. With CROIC replacing ROIC, Campbell Soup had the lowest Magic Formula ranking followed by McCormick & Company and Kellogg.

Green Mountain Too Hot
Coming in last is Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, the second best stock performer of the past decade. I like the company and its management but its stock is expensive. The winner using my formula is Con Agra, the maker of Orville Redenbacher's, Chef Boyardee and Healthy Choice brands. Morningstar gives it just two stars because of its lack of innovation and I would tend to agree. It's one reason why its stock is cheap - it's hard to get excited about its products. None of them stands out in a crowd. As for Campbell Soup, it finished middle of the pack using my formula, which is just fine.

Making Sense Of It All
Investment analysis is a lot like analyzing baseball statistics in that you can take all sorts of numbers and contort them into seemingly meaningless variables all in hopes of better understanding the company or player you're interested in.

You likely wouldn't compare the home run production of designated hitters with those of second basemen, but you would compare the home run stats of all 30 second basemen in Major League Baseball looking for that special combination of power, speed and fielding. Investing is no different. Using formulas like Greenblatt's, you see businesses from different sides, making it easier to spot the winners.

The Bottom Line
Campbell Soup cut its 2010 sales guidance February 17 as it continues to struggle with its soup business. It's not a huge concern as profitability won't change much, but management continues to look for ways to grow its legacy brand beyond current levels. As long as earnings remain strong, this tinkering is a sign they're not being complacent.

Have you ever wondered why its return on equity is 71.6%? The company repurchases its shares in huge quantities, reducing overall shareholder equity. In the past three years, Campbell has bought back $2.57 billion of its stock at an average price of $35.21 a share. While it has paid more for the shares than the equivalent amount it is worth today, that likely won't be the case for much longer. (Make an informed decision about your investments with these easy equations. For more information, see Analyze Investments Quickly With Ratios.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
  2. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
  3. Stock Analysis

    How to Find Quality Stocks Amid the Wreckage

    Finding companies with good earnings and hitting on all cylinders in this environment, although possible, is not easy.
  4. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  5. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  6. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  8. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  9. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center