In the Furniture world, Leggatt & Platt (NYSE:LEG) announced first-quarter earnings in April, and they were outstanding. Its management expects 2010 revenues of at least $3.1 billion and earnings per share of 95 cents. Over the last 28 months, it's achieved total shareholder returns of 49%, compared to negative 13% for the S&P 500. It's still a buy. Also, Ethan Allen (NYSE:ETH), with stock that was off 62% in the past five years, was still generating free cash flow. Since then, both it and La-Z-Boy (NYSE:LZB) have delivered encouraging third quarter results. The question now becomes, which is the better buy?

IN PICTURES: Retire A Millionaire In 10 Steps

Ethan Allen's third-quarter sales grew by 5%, while its nine-month net delivered sales declined by $108 million, or 20.3%. La-Z-Boy's third quarter sales grew by 5.7%, while its nine-month sales dropped $73.7 million, or 7.8%. Clearly, Ethan Allen's sales have been affected more so than La-Z-Boy's have. To put these numbers in perspective, Natuzzi (NYSE:NTZ) just reported first-quarter sales growth of 13.6%. It's obvious from these results and those of others like Tempur-Pedic (NYSE:TPX) and Pier 1 (NYSE:PIR) that the furniture business is slowly getting its groove back. They're not out of the woods yet, but they can see the road.

Ethan Allen suffered a third quarter operating loss (excluding impairment charges) of just $2.4 million, compared to a $19.0 million loss a year earlier. That's moving in the right direction. For the first nine months of 2010, its operating loss was $22.2 million, compared to a nine-month operating profit of $1.7 million in 2009, excluding restructuring charges. This tells me this past quarter is a turning point for the Connecticut company. As for La-Z-Boy, it delivered a 2010 third-quarter operating profit of $14.1 million, compared to a loss of $15.1 million year-over-year, excluding impairment charges. For the first nine months of 2010, its operating profit was $26.2 million, compared to an operating loss of $49.9 million in 2009. Once again, the turning point was the third quarter. La-Z-Boy wins when it comes to profitability.

Financial Health
Comparing EBITDA with total debt, La-Z-Boy is the stronger company. Its trailing twelve-month EBITDA is $58 million, while its total debt is $49.3 million. Ethan Allen's trailing 12-month EBITDA is $7.1 million, while its total debt is $203.2 million. La-Z-Boy has one-quarter the debt and eight-times the EBITDA earnings. La-Z-Boy's free cash is 7.4% of sales, compared with 5.7% for Ethan Allen. The only thing going in Ethan Allen's favor is cash. It has $73 million in cash, about the same amount as La-Z-Boy, but it has half the revenue. That's not much, but it's something.

The Bottom Line
La-Z-Boy and Ethan Allen's market caps are within $25 million of each other. Multiply their forward price-to-earnings ratios with price-to-sales, price-to-book and price-to-cash flow and you'll find that Ethan Allen's number is about 10-times that of La-Z-Boy. In fact, by all four valuation metrics, La-Z-Boy is the cheaper stock. However, if you want to buy the best stock, Leggatt & Platt is the way to go. (For more stock analysis, take a look at The World Cup 2010 Portfolio.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Investopedia makes you smarter.
Sign up for the News to Use newsletter for the latest in expert analysis, market insights and news.