Toy retailer Toys "R" Us filed an S-1 registration statement on May 27 with the SEC. The company's owners want to sell up to $800 million of its shares in what would be the biggest IPO in 15 years. Bain Capital, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Vornado Realty (NYSE:VNO) are hoping to catch lightning in a bottle, taking advantage of an extremely robust IPO market for retailers. Last October and November, Vitamin Shoppe (NYSE:VSI), Dollar General (NYSE:DG) and rue21 (NYSE:RUE) all went public. To date, their stocks are up 58%, 49% and 80% respectively. It would be irresponsible for Bain and the other owners not to strike while the iron is hot. That doesn't mean it's a good idea for investors to take the bait. I have five reasons to pass on the Toys 'R' Us deal.

IN PICTURES: 8 Tips For Starting Your Own Business

Passing the Buck
As is often the case with private equity deals, the acquired company is loaded with debt used by those firms to acquire the company in the first place. Toys "R" Us is no different. The current owners paid $6.6 billion in cash for the toy retailer in 2005, assuming $1.6 billion in debt. One quarter later under new ownership, Toys "R" Us debt had ballooned to $6.1 billion, meaning approximately $4.5 billion of the $6.6 billion purchase price was Toys "R" Us' own borrowing capacity. So for the purposes of discussion, we'll say that the three equal partners used $2.1 billion of their own capital. Now they're trying to get some of it back.

Few Changes
Have you been in a Toys "R" Us store lately? I have and to me there doesn't appear to be much different from a store circa 2005. I'm sure management feels otherwise. However, sales comparisons between the time the new owners took over in late 2005 and today would at least indicate there's been no metamorphosis at the New Jersey company. Let me explain. In the first quarter of 2006, the company consolidated the results of its 48%-owned interest in Toys "R" Us Japan. That year the Japanese stores had revenues of $1.65 billion and an operating loss of $12 million. Overall revenues were $13.1 billion with an operating profit of $649 million. Remove the Japanese stores from the 2006 numbers and you get the numbers for 2005. There was zero growth in 2006 and to make matters worse, 83% of the operating profit was eaten up by interest, mostly incurred to pay for the company. In the almost five years of owning Toys "R" Us, the owners have been able to increase revenues by just 5.9% and net earnings by 23.8%. Not much has changed here except the pile of debt.

The Competition
In its S-1, Toys "R" Us lists the competition as one of the risk factors in investing in its business. Ya think? Walmart (NYSE:WMT) accounts for one quarter of the toy sales in the U.S., and some estimates put its toy sales worldwide at $18 billion, $4.5 billion higher. In the time the current owners have had their hands on the company, Walmart has grown its revenues 41.7%, or seven times more than Toys "R" Us. Add in (Nasdaq:AMZN), Target (NYSE:TGT) and all the other smaller players in toy sales and you are taking a big chance on a faded name. Especially when you consider how much it's going to ask for its shares come IPO time.

I'd be surprised if Toys 'R' Us isn't aiming for some sort of average of the three retailers that went public at the end of last year. In terms of price to sales, Vitamin Shoppe went public at $17 and a price-to-sales of 0.73, Dollar General at $21 and a P/S of 0.65, and rue21 at $19 and a P/S of 1.07. Averaging them together, you get 0.82. In my opinion, Toys "R" Us should sell for lower than that, closer to Dollar General's valuation. However, should it go public with a 0.82 valuation against revenues, its market value will be $11.1 billion. This would mean the three partners stand to make as much as $8.3 billion or 400% on their investment. All this for producing 6% growth.

Bottom Line
I'm not a fan of IPOs. Too many times, it's a group of people simply trying to unload their problem on to the backs of new investors. In the case of Toys "R" Us, it's paying off $800 million of its existing $5 billion in debt. This does little to change the current business model but does get the wheels in motion for a quick exit by its three existing partners. Considering you could invest in Walmart at a lower valuation, it makes absolutely no sense to buy this IPO. (For more stock analysis articles, take a look at How Microsoft Lost Its Mojo.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  2. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  3. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  4. Economics

    Is Wall Street Living in Denial?

    Will remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
  5. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  6. Investing News

    How AT&T Evolved into a Mobile Phone Giant

    A third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Yelp: Can it Regain its Losses in 2016? (YELP)

    Yelp investors have had reason to be happy recently. Will the good spirits last?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  10. Stock Analysis

    GoPro's Stock: Can it Fall Much Further? (GPRO)

    As a company that primarily sells discretionary products, GoPro and its potential falls right in line with consumer trends. Is that good or bad?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center