The movie industry was once a creative stronghold, in which unique storylines and complex characters stood tall. While it can still be argued that the creativity of Hollywood is still intact, the corporate hand of influence has certainly changed the way in which it is presented. As bottom-line earnings become the sole (legal) goal of corporations, are industries evolving merely to meet the demands of shareholders? Perhaps a quick look at the movie industry can give some insight into the matter.

IN PICTURES: How To Make Your First $1 Million

Sequels, Prequels and Trilogies
Large conglomerates, such as General Electric (NYSE:GE) and Comcast (Nasdaq:CMCSA) (both significant owners of NBC Universal), and Viacom (NYSE:VIA), which owns Paramount Pictures, are required to obtain the highest possible return on equity (ROE) for their investors. As a result, taking DreamWorks as an example, blockbuster hits such as Shrek and Kung-Fu Panda must be followed with a sequel if those returns are expected to be higher than the next best alternative.

Movie viewers often complain that their favorite movie is often ruined by unnecessary sequels. However, if we think of entertainment as a business, it makes financial sense to indulge these practices. When an oil company encounters a successful well in a region, it is likely to increase production capacity on that field.

The "Little" Guy
One of the best examples to illustrate this concept is the Saw series. Saw 1 gave Twisted Pictures, Evolution Entertainment and Lions Gate Entertainment (NYSE:LGF) a greater than 10,000% return on the initial budget investment. In fact, shortly after the release of the movie, LGF shares appreciated by approximately 60%. Production and distribution companies aim to milk the series until it becomes unprofitable, and Saw 6 has seen a significant drop in return to 180%, although the picture was still slightly profitable. The Walt Disney Company (NYSE:DIS), Time Warner (NYSE:TWX) and Sony (NYSE:SNE), fall under the same corporate mandate of maximizing investors returns. Currently, the average expenditures for a film are over $100,000,000, with a large surge in the costs associated with marketing.

Quantity Over Quality
There has also been a steady rise in the number of pictures released per year, from 161 in 1980 and 173 in 1981 to 605 and 518 in 2008 and 2009 respectively. Like most industries, the film business suffered during the recession, but will surely rise as the economy turns the corner.

The Bottom Line
Despite the recent increase in movie production, 1939, 1941, 1967, 1974 and 2001 are often considered the best years for cinemas with such classics as The Wizard of Oz, Citizen Kane, Bonnie and Clyde, The Godfather Part 2 and Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring respectively. Before the film industry became a corporate entity with bottom-line responsibilities similar to other major corporations, movies audiences were drawn to films due to their unique plots, rather than clever marketing campaigns.

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Starbucks: Profiting One Cup at a Time (SBUX)

    Starbucks is everywhere. But is it a worthwhile business? Ask the shareholders who've made it one of the world's most successful companies.
  2. Stock Analysis

    How Medtronic Makes Money (MDT)

    Here's the story of an American medical device firm that covers almost every segment in medicine and recently moved to Ireland to pay less in taxes.
  3. Investing News

    Latest Labor Numbers: Good News for the Market?

    Some economic numbers are indicating that the labor market is outperforming the stock market. Should investors be bullish?
  4. Investing News

    Stocks with Big Dividend Yields: 'It's a Trap!'

    Should you seek high yielding-dividend stocks in the current investment environment?
  5. Investing News

    Should You Be Betting with Buffett Right Now?

    Following Warren Buffett's stock picks has historically been a good strategy. Is considering his biggest holdings in 2016 a good idea?
  6. Products and Investments

    Cash vs. Stocks: How to Decide Which is Best

    Is it better to keep your money in cash or is a down market a good time to buy stocks at a lower cost?
  7. Investing News

    Who Does Cheap Oil Benefit? See This Stock (DG)

    Cheap oil won't benefit most companies, but this retailer might buck that trend.
  8. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Performance Review: Emerging Markets Equities in 2015

    Find out why emerging markets struggled in 2015 and why a half-decade long trend of poor returns is proving optimistic growth investors wrong.
  10. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
RELATED FAQS
  1. Should mutual funds be subject to more regulation?

    Mutual funds, when compared to other types of pooled investments such as hedge funds, have very strict regulations. In fact, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do ETFs pay capital gains?

    Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can generate capital gains that are transferred to shareholders, typically once a year, triggering ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do real estate hedge funds work?

    A hedge fund is a type of investment vehicle and business structure that aggregates capital from multiple investors and invests ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Are Vanguard ETFs commission-free?

    While some Vanguard exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are available commission-free from third-party brokers, a large portion ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Do Vanguard ETFs require a minimum investment?

    Vanguard completely waives any U.S. dollar minimum amounts to buy its exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and the minimum ETF investment ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Can mutual fund expense ratios be negative?

    Mutual fund expense ratios cannot be negative. An expense ratio is the sum total of all fees charged by an asset management ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center