The election of Republican Scott Brown of Massachusetts adds a new layer of uncertainty to President Obama's push for universal health coverage for all Americans. Tipping the balance of power from the democratically controlled Congress and allowing the Republicans filibuster power may prove to be the single most important influence on the final health care bill. However, if a bill is passed that is similar to the Senate health bill, the health insurance industry will be negatively impacted. (For related reading, check out Intro To Insurance: Health Insurance.)

There are an estimated over 40 million uninsured Americans today and the bill would increase coverage to about 29 million uninsured. The Council of Economic Advisers for President Obama reports that the average annual premium for individuals is over $4,000 creating more than $116 billion in new premium revenue. And the bill provides strong incentive for these uninsured to buy insurance via inflicting penalties for those who do not buy. That's where the good news ends.

Capping the Medical Loss Ratio
The health insurance industry is a for-profit industry. The large insurers, United Health Group (NYSE:UNH), Aetna (NYSE:AET), Wellpoint (NYSE:WLP) and Cigna (NYSE:CI), are all publically-traded companies.

Health insurers make money when the spread between medical costs and premiums is wide. According to the companies, through cost controls, higher quality of care and health initiative programs to promote wellness, medical costs are able to be controlled, thus providing better quality of care while raising profitability for the insurers.

Health insurance companies measure the success of these initiatives by calculating a medical loss ratio (or medical benefit ratio). The medical loss ratio is the ratio insurance companies and analysts use to determine profitability, similar to the profit margin ratio used by other industries. It is defined as the amount spent on medical care out of the premiums (revenue).

The companies increase profits and earnings per share as the medical loss ratio improves. The Senate bill tries to cap the medical loss ratio by provisioning that $0.85 out of every dollar needs to be spent on medical care. That means that $0.15 of every dollar is left over to pay for non-medical expenses and for profit; a big change for an industry where it is not uncommon to have medical loss ratios averaging between 77-81% for most of the big players.

Investors do not like to invest in businesses with virtually no ability to improve profits - something this bill attempts to achieve with the medical loss ratio requirements. (For more, check out Investing In Health Insurance Companies.)

Insuring the Undesirables
Health insurance is based on actuarial assumptions - formulas used to determine if the premiums charged are sufficient to cover the potential medical costs. These formulas are based in part on a member's medical history and the presence of pre-existing conditions. The Senate bill proposes banning the denial of coverage due to pre-existing conditions. Additionally, it restricts the insurers from placing lifetime limits on benefits. Both of these components will negatively impact the profitability of the insurer. (For more, see Health Insurance: Paying For Pre-Existing Conditions.)

The Bottom Line
Investing in an industry heavily tied to changes in government spending means headline risk is extremely high. Health insurers' profitability with universal health coverage and Medicare becomes even more influenced by changes in government policies. The election of a Republican in a Democratic state who campaigned against government controlled health care put a monkey wrench in President Obama's quest for universal health coverage. As such, the Senate bill passed may undergo significant changes. Therefore, if and when a final health care bill gets passed and if it resembles the components of the Senate bill aforementioned, the impact to the health insurers stock will be negative.

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
  2. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
  3. Stock Analysis

    How to Find Quality Stocks Amid the Wreckage

    Finding companies with good earnings and hitting on all cylinders in this environment, although possible, is not easy.
  4. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  5. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  6. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  8. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  9. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center