While the general consensus is that software giant SAP AG (NYSE:SAP) paid too much, or will pay to much, for its acquisition of semi-rival Sybase Inc, (NYSE:SY), very few journalists have actually defined the idea of "too much," other than the fact that SY shares are 56% more expensive than they were prior to the announcement.

Even fewer journalists have looked at any of the numbers beyond the $5.8 billion SAP is paying to bring Sybase into the fold. So, before you draw any conclusions about SAP's acquisition, can we at least take a look at what it's getting for its $5.8 billion smackers? Maybe the 56% premium is still a bargain.

IN PICTURES: How To Make Your First $1 Million
It's All Relative
How much is $5.8 billion to SAP AG? Not a lot in the grand scheme of things. The company does about 11 billion euros in revenue per year, and earned about 1.78 billion euros in 2009 - and that was an off year. As of the end of last quarter, SAP was sitting on about 3 billion euros worth of cash or cash equivalents.

And what about Sybase? The company's been pulling fairly reliable annual revenues of about $1.1 billion, and turning that into yearly income of anywhere from $130 million to more than $160 million.

That may well be why so many investors are balking; it's a $5.8 billion outlay for a company that's only apt to boost the bottom line by, let's be generous and say $200 million for starters? The acquisition's P/E ratio using those numbers rolls in at a fairly pricey 29 versus the stock's (SY's) approximate P/E of 21.4 prior to Wednesday's jump.

However, there are two things that the acquisition's opponents may be forgetting.

Sybase is sitting on some cash and near-cash holdings of its own - about $1.3 billion as of the end of last quarter. Since SAP is buying all the assets of Sybase as well (and will get that cash put back in the coffer), the actual price tag of the purchase is more along the lines of $4.2 billion. That brings the enterprise's P/E level down to a more palatable 26, give or take, based on 2009's numbers. It's 24.4, using Reuters' income estimates for 2010. Either way, it's cheaper.

Par for the Course
Even at an earnings multiple of 24.4, some current SAP owners may grumble, citing that 56% premium over Tuesday's last price. Fair enough. However, such premiums aren't unusual in the business, and the recent instances have worked out fine.

Take Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL), for instance. It paid a 30% premium for Phase-Forward (NASDAQ:PFWD) last month.

Also too much? Maybe, or maybe not. Prior to Oracle's acquisition announcement, PFWD was trading at about 22 times 2010's expected earnings. After the price jump to $16.80, Oracle ended up paying a projected P/E of about 28.5, which in the same ballpark as SAP's purchase of Sybase. Yet, the Oracle decision caught much less criticism.

Bottom Line
Two points need to be made of the negative reaction to the premium SAP will be paying.

The first is - as the number crunching above indicates - the SY price tag really isn't all that unusual, even if Sybase ends up earning something closer to 2009's numbers than its expected 2010 earnings. The flurry of questions and jeers may be largely the result of the market's implosion after the Oracle news, but before the SAP news. Investors may just be overly sensitive to premiums at this time, and in this case, they may not have even bothered thinking bout anything other than the price premium.

The second point is that in most cases, and particularly with technology, growth is generally more important than valuation. Yet, valuation seemed to be the stumbling block here. So, before jumping to any conclusions, investors should understand that Sybase was expected to grow earnings by 43% this year, and by 9% next year.

Between the typical "tech acquisition" valuation and the forecasted growth, the "they paid too much" arguments don't hold a lot of water. (For related reading, take a look at The Wonderful World Of Mergers.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    3 Resilient Oil Stocks for a Down Market

    Stuck on oil? Take a look at these six stocks—three that present risk vs. three that offer some resiliency.
  2. Economics

    Keep an Eye on These Emerging Economies

    Emerging markets have been hammered lately, but these three countries (and their large and young populations) are worth monitoring.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Is Pepsi (PEP) Still a Safe Bet?

    PepsiCo has long been known as one of the most resilient stocks throughout the broader market. Is this still the case today?
  4. Investing

    The ABCs of Bond ETF Distributions

    How do bond exchange traded fund (ETF) distributions work? It’s a question I get a lot. First, let’s explain what we mean by distributions.
  5. Stock Analysis

    3 Stocks that Are Top Bets for Retirement

    These three stocks are resilient, fundamentally sound and also pay generous dividends.
  6. Investing News

    Are Stocks Cheap Now? Nope. And Here's Why

    Are stocks cheap right now? Be wary of those who are telling you what you want to hear. Here's why.
  7. Investing News

    4 Value Stocks Worth Your Immediate Attention

    Here are four stocks that offer good value and will likely outperform the majority of stocks throughout the broader market over the next several years.
  8. Investing News

    These 3 High-Quality Stocks Are Dividend Royalty

    Here are three resilient, dividend-paying companies that may mitigate some worry in an uncertain investing environment.
  9. Stock Analysis

    An Auto Stock Alternative to Ford and GM

    If you're not sure where Ford and General Motors are going, you might want to look at this auto investment option instead.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 4 Best Buy-and-Hold ETFs

    Explore detailed analyses of the top buy-and-hold exchange traded funds, and learn about their characteristics, statistics and suitability.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!