At this point in the credit crisis it would seem that anybody claiming to have a firm handle on everything going on is either crazy, dishonest or a singular genius. Take the latest news from Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) - the terms of a deal to settle much of its liability to Freddie Mac (Nasdq:FMCC) and Fannie Mae (Nasdaq:FNMA) for mortgage put-backs not only surprised most observers, but angered a lot of people all over again. Moreover, there is uncertainty everywhere an investor cares to look regarding whether or not other banks will be able to strike similar deals and how these banks will deal with other claimants.

IN PICTURES: 9 Simple Investing Ratios You Need To Know

A Quick Take on the Deal
Early in January, Bank of America announced a deal with Freddie and Fannie whereby it was settling its potential put-back obligations to these entities for a total of $2.8 billion. This deal covers just mortgages related to Countrywide (which Bank of America bought), but will avoid more litigation regarding BAC's ultimate responsibility in buying back misrepresented or outright fraudulent mortgages under the terms of the put-back agreements that it had with these agencies.

In many respects, this was a deal so favorable to BAC it was close to outright theft. The liability between BAC and Freddie/Fannie could have been anywhere from $10 billion to upwards of $20 billion depending upon the assumptions an investor wanted to make about the settlement. As it stands, even more than $20 billion would have represented only about a 1% delinquency rate for these loans, when the actual rate has been running more like 11%.

It is also worth mentioning that this is tantamount to another bailout for the banks. Freddie/Fannie are under direct government control, while Bank of America (along with Citigroup (NYSE:C), Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) and many others) needed very cheap government money to stay liquid. What is interesting about this move, though, is that it avoids the splashy headlines of another TARP-like program that would be announced from a White House or Congressional podium. (For more, see Liquidity And Toxicity: Did TARP Fix The Financial System?)

More to Come
Although this deal takes care of a lot of Bank of America's liability to the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), it is not over yet. There are still upwards of $3 billion in non-CFC-related claims to cope with, though the mortgages in this pot have had significantly lower default rates.

Beyond that is the question of how the banks will handle the monoline insurers and private investors. BAC likely owes billions of dollars to companies like Assured Guaranty (NYSE:AGO) and MBIA (NYSE:MBI), and it seems unlikely that they would take the same pennies-on-the-dollar deal as the GSEs. By the same token, given that the market caps on just those two companies alone are $3.7 billion and $2.5 billion, even a heavily discounted deal could be really good news.

Then there is the question of the private investors. Allianz (NYSE:AZ), which owns the huge bond firm PIMCO, likely has billions of dollars in claims, and who knows what the bill is for companies like Fidelity, BlackRock (NYSE:BLK), T.Rowe Price (Nasdaq:TROW) and so on. Can any of these companies give a similarly sweet deal to B of A and face their investors (or their investors' attorneys)? Even if the government called them up and asked them to "take one for the team", there is a limit to how much they can write down these obligations.

It's Not Over Yet
Investors can likely count on years of negotiation and legal wrangling for BAC, Citigroup (NYSE:C), Deutsche Bank (NYSE:DB), Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), Wells Fargo and a whole host of others. Hardly anybody was innocent in this affair - ranging from duplicitous mortgage borrowers to avaricious mortgage brokers, greedy banks, and opportunistic investment banks (and let's not forget the sleepwalking regulators).

While many people will be furious with what they regard as yet another bailout of major financial institutions, the fact is that this is often how business works. Right or wrong, fair or unfair, companies that are large enough to threaten the stability of the entire system don't pay the same penalties as small fry who can be punished severely with no systemic risk. For bank investors, though, this is likely good news - it is uncertain to what extent other banks can replicate B of A's deal with Freddie and Fannie, but any progress towards a resolution of this mess, at a discount to the probable real liability no less, has to be seen as good news. (For more, see Top 10 Bailout Money Recipients.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center