Not long after Rock-Tenn (NYSE:RKT) finished its deal for Smurft-Stone, International Paper (NYSE:IP) has decided to make its own play for further consolidation in the packaging business. Late Monday, IP announced that it had launched a hostile offer for Temple-Inland (NYSE:TIN), but Temple-Inland quickly shot down the offer and implemented a poison pill. What remains to be seen now is whether IP can raise the stakes high enough to either persuade the board to change its mind or compel Temple-Inland's own shareholders to rise up and demand approval of the deal.

TUTORIAL: Investing 101

The Deal
IP surprised the market with a $30.60 cash bid for Temple-Inland, a price about 46% above the company's prior value. If the deal happens, IP would pick up Temple-Inland's 4 million tons of containerboard capacity, over 2 billion square feet in gypsum wallboard capacity, and significant capacity in other building products like lumber and particleboard. Not only would the deal make the combined company a force in containerboard (with about 39% share) with all the attendant synergies of scale, but it would move IP further into the building products sector. For more, see Smurfit Stone Emerges From The Dead.)

Doth Temple-Inland Protest Too Much?
Poring over the "he said, he said" of the dueling press releases, it seems pretty clear that IP approached Temple-Inland and that Temple-Inland turned them down cold (a unanimous board vote against the $30.60 deal). Of course, as is part and parcel of such rejections, Temple-Inland loaded its response with mock indignation that IP would dare offer such a low price, called the deal opportunistic, complained that IP's comparables are unfair and so on. In other words, standard boilerplate language for a rejection.

I generally have little patience for target companies who respond along the lines of "how dare this company come in and offer our investors a guaranteed 40%+ gain", but I can see Temple-Inland's point here. First of all, the bid price seems to fall short a 50/50 split of the expected synergies of the deal. Furthermore, TIN is a valuable (and increasingly scarce) asset to IP and IP has access to extremely cheap debt. That seems like a cogent argument for IP to pay more - at least 10 to 20% more. (For more, see Understanding Mergers And Acquisitions.)

IP Needs to Sweeten the Pot
Considering Temple-Inland's staggered board and poison pill, it seems like IP would have its work cut out to make a hostile deal work. Moreover, if some of the predictions of higher interest rates in the post-QE2 world are accurate, the clock may be ticking on the company's access to low-cost debt.

Like most commodity products, containerboard is an industry that rewards scale and low production costs. What that means to IP is that a deal is worth doing, assuming reasonable terms. Still, the company has options. Packaging Corp (NYSE:PKG) would be an alternative in containerboard, assuming that what IP really wants out of a deal is more capacity in that market (as opposed to the cyclically downtrodden building products business). Less likely options might include Graphic Packaging (NYSE:GPK) or KapStone Paper (NYSE:KS) which, while "packaging companies" are more exposed to markets like kraft paper and "CUK board." (For related reading, see The Booming Business Of Container Leasing.)

At the same time, if the M&A pot really starts swirling, who knows what may happen. Perhaps Temple-Inland would look for a more friendly combination with Packaging Corp or a company like MeadWestvaco (NYSE:MWV) as an alternate strategy.

Bottom Line - Down, But Not Boring
A lot of packaging names have sold off as the economic recovery seems to be slowing. This makes a certain amount of sense as packaging is a derivative product - demand for packaging is derived from the demand for whatever is in the package. To that end, Temple-Inland has been an underperformer of late, but not dramatically so.

Rock-Tenn and Packaging Corp both look like names worthy of investor consideration today, but the fight between IP and Temple-Inland probably is not over yet. Figure on IP trying to sweeten the pot at least once or twice before facing a choice between really ratcheting up the pressure on Temple-Inland's board, finding a new target or standing pat with its current assets.

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Is Now the Right Time to Buy Brazilian Stocks?

    Examine the current state of the economy of Brazil, and learn why there may be some reasons for investors to look for a rally in Brazilian stocks.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Will WYNN Continue to Rally?

    Wynn Resorts has experienced a rally recently. Will it remain a good bet?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Don't Be Fooled by the Market's Recent Rally

    The bulls won for a bit in early October, but will bears have the last laugh?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Will Twitter's Stock Find its Wings Soon?

    Twitter is an enigma to many investors, but its story is pretty straightforward.
  5. Investing Basics

    How to Think About Seasonality Trends

    Investors benefit when company research incorporates seasonality trends that predict relative strength and weakness throughout the calendar year.
  6. Stock Analysis

    8 Solid Utility Stocks for a Bear Market

    If you're seeking modest appreciation, generous dividend payments and resiliency, consider these eight utility stocks.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Phillips 66 (PSX) is a Solid Long-Term Bet

    Here's why Phillips 66 will likely remain one of the world’s largest and most profitable companies for a long time to come.
  8. Stock Analysis

    3 Resilient Oil Stocks for a Down Market

    Stuck on oil? Take a look at these six stocks—three that present risk vs. three that offer some resiliency.
  9. Economics

    Keep an Eye on These Emerging Economies

    Emerging markets have been hammered lately, but these three countries (and their large and young populations) are worth monitoring.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Is Pepsi (PEP) Still a Safe Bet?

    PepsiCo has long been known as one of the most resilient stocks throughout the broader market. Is this still the case today?
  1. Can a company's working capital turnover ratio be negative?

    A company's working capital turnover ratio can be negative when a company's current liabilities exceed its current assets. ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Does working capital measure liquidity?

    Working capital is a commonly used metric, not only for a company’s liquidity but also for its operational efficiency and ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do I read and analyze an income statement?

    The income statement, also known as the profit and loss (P&L) statement, is the financial statement that depicts the ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Can working capital be too high?

    A company's working capital ratio can be too high in the sense that an excessively high ratio is generally considered an ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How do I use discounted cash flow (DCF) to value stock?

    Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis can be a very helpful tool for analysts and investors in equity valuation. It provides ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!