Yet another company has fallen into the purgatory that is the FDA Complete Response Letter (CRL) cycle. While it was not altogether unexpected that MannKind (Nasdaq:MNKD) would get another CRL from the FDA (which is tantamount to a rejection), this nitpicky rejection from the agency will likely set the company back at least another year in its attempt to get inhaled insulin to the market and in the hands of diabetics.

IN PICTURES: 9 Simple Investing Ratios You Need To Know

The Latest Developments
On Wednesday afternoon, MannKind announced that the FDA had sent the company a CRL for its most recent re-application for its Afrezza inhaled insulin. This time the FDA's concerns were about potential differences between the MedTone inhaler used in past pivotal studies and the next-generation device that the company intends to actually launch with approval.

The FDA has now determined that the company needs to run at least two additional new studies (one in Type 1 diabetics and one in Type 2 diabetics) to determine if all of the relevant data is equivalent between the two devices. The FDA also wants at least one arm of one of the studies to include patients using the older MedTone device so that there can be head-to-head comparisons. (For related reading, check out The Curious And Complicated Case Of MannKind.)

To some extent, this is a legitimate request from the FDA. It is fair for the agency to want to confirm that the two devices work in basically the same fashion and produce the same outcomes in patients. Moreover, the FDA's request that the study include at least 12 weeks of consistent use (after a titration period) is not terribly onerous either - after all, diabetes drug studies often run at least a year, and the FDA increasingly seems to be demanding a minimum of two years of data.

In addition to the head-to-head comparison, the FDA wants more mundane data like information on the new device, updated safety information and so forth. (For more, see Dark Days In Diabetes.)

Will The FDA Be Reasonable?
Whether or not MannKind management foresaw the need for this data to deal with the FDA or launch the device commercially, the company had already begun two studies (Affinity 1 and 2) to test the next-gen device. The company stated that it intends to go to the FDA and see if they can modify these existing studies to include a MedTone arm and therefore meet the FDA's new requirements.

In a reasonable and rational world, the FDA would go along with this, even though the FDA is loathe to approve any "midstream" changes to a trial's protocol. But does anybody want to bet on the FDA being rational and reasonable?

The Future For MannKind
Even if the FDA is willing to cut the company a small break and modify the Affinity studies, it is likely going to take at least six months to run the study, and then additional time to collect the data and submit a new NDA to the FDA. At that point, the clock starts all over again and it could take upwards of a year for the FDA to render another verdict. If MannKind is very, very lucky, this might delay Afrezza by a year (assuming the data is to the FDA's liking), but 18 months up to two years may be more likely.

In the meantime, this is clearly not going to help the company's partnering efforts. Assuming that there was Big Pharma interest in Afrezza (and that may be more of an "if" than MNKD bulls want to believe), why wouldn't they either wait or press MannKind for more favorable terms? After all, Merck (NYSE:MRK), Sanofi (NYSE:SNY) and Novartis (NYSE:NVS) didn't get to be large companies by being pushovers at the negotiating table.

As MannKind stews, this is incrementally positive news for high-flying NovoNordisk (NYSE:NVO) and its NovoRapid insulin - a product that would be at some considerable risk given the very promising pharmokinetics of Afrezza insulin. While the same is true for other rapid-acting insulin-makers like Sanofi and Lilly (NYSE:LLY), the incremental impact is a bit less. Likewise, this could give investors in Biodel (Nasdaq:BIOD) a bit more hope as the company won't be as far behind MannKind in dealing with its own FDA rejection and new trials.

The Bottom Line
MannKind was always a risky stock, and Wednesday's events are just par for the course. While it may well be true that the FDA is being finicky and demanding past a point of reasonable diligence, the fact is that MannKind has to deal with the FDA that is, not the FDA that should be. Though I do not see how there is much argument left about whether Afrezza is an advance in the care of diabetes (it is), getting through the FDA minefield is just one step, and the even bigger minefield of the commercial market (and the true demand for inhaled insulin) still awaits. (For related reading, check out Icahn's Largest Positions.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What Exactly Are Arbitrage Mutual Funds?

    Learn about arbitrage funds and how this type of investment generates profits by taking advantage of price differentials between the cash and futures markets.
  2. Investing News

    Ferrari’s IPO: Ready to Roll or Poor Timing?

    Will Ferrari's shares move fast off the line only to sputter later?
  3. Stock Analysis

    5 Cheap Dividend Stocks for a Bear Market

    Here are five stocks that pay safe dividends and should be at least somewhat resilient to a bear market.
  4. Investing

    How to Win More by Losing Less in Today’s Markets

    The further you fall, the harder it is to climb back up. It’s a universal truth that is painfully apparent in the investing world.
  5. Investing

    5 Recession Resistant Industries

    No companies are completely recession proof, but some industries perform better in a weak economy than others.
  6. Fundamental Analysis

    Use Options Data To Predict Stock Market Direction

    Options market trading data can provide important insights about the direction of stocks and the overall market. Here’s how to track it.
  7. Stock Analysis

    2 Oil Stocks to Buy Right Now (PSX,TSO)

    Can these two oil stocks buck the trend?
  8. Investing News

    What Alcoa’s (AA) Breakup Means for Investors

    Alcoa plans to split into two companies. Is this a bullish catalyst for investors?
  9. Investing

    A Look at 6 Leading Female Value Investors

    In an industry still largely predominated by men, we look at 6 leading female value investors working today.
  10. Term

    What Is Financial Performance?

    Financial performance measures a firm’s ability to generate profits through the use of its assets.
  1. Can working capital be too high?

    A company's working capital ratio can be too high in the sense that an excessively high ratio is generally considered an ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How do I use discounted cash flow (DCF) to value stock?

    Discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis can be a very helpful tool for analysts and investors in equity valuation. It provides ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What is the formula for calculating compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in Excel?

    The compound annual growth rate, or CAGR for short, measures the return on an investment over a certain period of time. Below ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. When does the fixed charge coverage ratio suggest that a company should stop borrowing ...

    Since the fixed charge coverage ratio indicates the number of times a company is capable of making its fixed charge payments ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!