There are plenty of old sayings that advise investors to swim against the tide and invest into troubled sectors when pessimism is at its worst. That is all well and good, but precious few investors have the self-confidence and long-term focus to just ignore a 20% or 30% near-term loss on a new position. With that in mind, then, investors should certainly do their due diligence on now-troubled nuclear power stocks but let the dust settle a bit before taking on new positions.

IN PICTURES: 9 Simple Investing Ratios You Need To Know

Shoot First, Ask Questions Later
In the wake of the combined earthquake and tsunami disaster in northeastern Japan, and the resulting emergencies at multiple nuclear facilities in Japan, public fear about nuclear power is once again running high. With activists already jumping on their airwaves to exaggerate and misinform, it seems inevitable that the nuclear industry has lost whatever momentum and credibility it had rebuilt in the 25 years since the Chernobyl disaster.

Investors need go no further than the stocks of those companies exposed to the nuclear power industry. Go-to names like uranium miners Cameco (NYSE:CCJ) and Denison (AMEX: DNN) and engineering and construction firm Shaw (Nasdaq:SHAW) were among those that took a significant drop in the early trading after the disaster struck. Since then, even well-diversified names like General Electric (NYSE:GE) (which has some, but not a lot, of nuclear energy exposure) have come under selling pressure.

The Follow On Effects
As Japanese engineers struggle to limit the damage and health risks at their nuclear facilities, several governments have decided to implement proactive caution. Germany and Switzerland have suspended the approval process for new reactors and Germany will be shutting down some older reactors for a safety reassessment. Though the U.S. government has not yet announced any similar moves, it seems hard to imagine that an administration that shut down drilling in the Gulf of Mexico after the BP spill will not impose some sort of moratorium or reevaluation.

That is difficult news for European utility operators like RWE and EON (Nasdaq:EONGY), as nuclear generation is a significant factor for them. In the U.S., the impact on utilities like Exelon (NYSE:EXC) is less significant so far as nuclear is a smaller percentage of the U.S. power grid.

Hope Vs. Reality
As fears about nuclear power spread again, green power is back in the spotlight. Solar companies like JA Solar (Nasdaq:JASO) and Suntech (NYSE:STP) and wind power names like Vestas (Nasdaq:VWDRY.PK) have drawn stronger bids since the earthquake, presumably on the theory that nuclear energy is dead in the water and only green solutions can fill the gap. (For related reading, see Going Green With Exchange-Traded Funds.)

Unfortunately, the limits of science and engineering do not change just because activists want them to change. Solar and wind are nowhere near viable sources of baseload power today and hoping they will get better does not produce the needed power today. Consequently, utilities and governments still have the same menu on undesirable choices - slow strangulation with cheap coal, risking public furor with nuclear, or going with natural gas. The last choice, natural gas, is a pretty credible option in North America, but much less viable in Europe where over-reliance on Russian gas imports has already become both an economic and political issue.

Risk Versus Reward
There are compelling reasons to look at the nuclear power sector today. Nuclear energy is not going to go away and companies like Cameco, as well as junior miners like UR-Energy (AMEX:URG) and Hathor Exploration, will likely see higher uranium prices in the not-so-distant future. Likewise, companies like Shaw and Fluor (NYSE:FLR) are not so committed to nuclear energy that they will be left out if utilities have to go with other energy sources for their new plants. Even a company like EnergySolutions (NYSE:ES) can do well enough from legacy nuclear power business that will not go away overnight.

The Bottom Line
All of that said, an investor jumping into the sector today has to have courage and an ability to ignore short-term losses. After all, the news coming from Japan is not likely to get better right away and a potential worsening of the situation at those nuclear plants is a major risk factor. There are plenty of credible reasons to believe that nuclear power will not go away and that stocks are getting hit more by emotion than sober long-term analysis, but investors who cannot tolerate the prospect of 20% near-term losses should not volunteer to swim against the tide right now. (For more, see Taking Bets On The Uranium Miners.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Products and Investments

    Cash vs. Stocks: How to Decide Which is Best

    Is it better to keep your money in cash or is a down market a good time to buy stocks at a lower cost?
  2. Investing News

    Who Does Cheap Oil Benefit? See This Stock (DG)

    Cheap oil won't benefit most companies, but this retailer might buck that trend.
  3. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  4. Stock Analysis

    Performance Review: Emerging Markets Equities in 2015

    Find out why emerging markets struggled in 2015 and why a half-decade long trend of poor returns is proving optimistic growth investors wrong.
  5. Investing

    Don't Freak Out Over Black Swans; Be Prepared

    Could 2016 be a big year for black swans? Who knows? Here's what black swans are, how they can devastate the unprepared, and how the prepared can emerge unscathed.
  6. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
  7. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
  9. Stock Analysis

    How to Find Quality Stocks Amid the Wreckage

    Finding companies with good earnings and hitting on all cylinders in this environment, although possible, is not easy.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sirius XM's Return on Equity (ROE) (SIRI)

    Learn more about the Sirius XM's overall 2015 performance, return on equity performance and future predictions for the company's ROE in 2016 and beyond.
RELATED FAQS
  1. When does a growth stock turn into a value opportunity?

    A growth stock turns into a value opportunity when it trades at a reasonable multiple of the company's earnings per share ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the formula for calculating EBITDA?

    When analyzing financial fitness, corporate accountants and investors alike closely examine a company's financial statements ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do I calculate the P/E ratio of a company?

    The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is a valuation measure that compares the level of stock prices to the level of corporate ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do you calculate return on equity (ROE)?

    Return on equity (ROE) is a ratio that provides investors insight into how efficiently a company (or more specifically, its ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. How do you calculate working capital?

    Working capital represents the difference between a firm’s current assets and current liabilities. The challenge can be determining ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the formula for calculating the current ratio?

    The current ratio is a financial ratio that investors and analysts use to examine the liquidity of a company and its ability ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center