A curious announcement came out this week when Swiss food and nutrition giant Nestle (OTC:NSRGY) announced that it was acquiring U.S.-based medical therapeutics and diagnostics company Prometheus Laboratories. Nestle will fold Prometheus into its newly formed Nestle Health Science division and likely will guide the company's efforts toward more research into nutrition-based therapeutics as well as areas like metabolism. Although Prometheus' $250 million or so in ongoing annual revenue will not make a major dent in Nestle, it is an interesting deal on multiple levels. (For background reading, see Investing In The Healthcare Sector.)

TUTORIAL: Stock Basics

What Nestle Is Getting
In acquiring Prometheus, Nestle is getting a business that has focused on diagnostics and therapeutics for indications in gastroenterology and oncology. Prometheus recently got approval to sell a Crohn's diagnostic test, and the company sells a variety of drugs for conditions like cancer and irritable bowel disease.

Nestle did not specify the price it is paying for Prometheus. Considering others deals like Novartis' (NYSE:NVS) acquisition of Genoptix, Quest's (NYSE:DGX) acquisition of Celera, and Thermo Fisher's (NYSE:TMO) acquisition of Phadia, Nestle likely paid at least $650 million, but that is purely speculation at this point.

Going Where Others Have Failed Before?
It may be premature to suggest that Prometheus is the first step in a headlong jump into pharmaceuticals and diagnostics, but it is a notion worth considering. It is relatively unusual for a consumer products company to expand into pharmaceuticals and diagnostics, and the record here is mixed. (For more, see Healthcare Sector: Play Or Stay Away?)

DuPont (NYSE:DD) had some success in pharmaceuticals (including near-blockbusters Hyzaar and Cozaar) before deciding that the cost and complications of clinical development, FDA approval, and pharmaceutical marketing outweighed the profits to be made. Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) likewise had visions of pairing a branded drug business with its consumer products franchises and likewise found that it was more trouble than it was worth. P&G later sold its drug business to Warner Chilcott (Nasdaq:WCRX).

The drug business can be enticing. There's limited competition (and the FDA approval process means that nobody sneaks into the market), ample reimbursement, rich pricing, and a need for clinical data. After all, a company cannot sell a branded drug without some proof it works - unlike the packaged food business where very little ever has to be proved.

At the same time, the drug business demands beastly expensive R&D, long development time lines, and extensive clinical proof of efficacy and safety. Unlike packaged foods, where a product launch is based largely on whether tasting panels like the product and the company believes it can market it profitably, the FDA is the ultimate arbiter of whether a branded drug can be sold in the U.S.

Mixing Food and Drugs
Another interesting angle to this move is the blurring line between food, medicine and nutrition. Abbott Labs (NYSE:ABT), for instance, is just one healthcare company that also markets a line of over-the-counter food/nutrition products. Moreover, while many companies like Herbalife (NYSE:HLF) and GNC (NYSE:GNC) sell supplements with vague nutritional claims, drug companies like GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE:GSK) have taken the next step and pursued clinical trials and FDA approval for modified nutritional supplements.

With all that in mind, there are multiple directions Nestle can go with this deal. Prometheus may give Nestle new sales avenues for its existing nutrition business (one of the largest in the world). It may also be the case that Nestle can leverage Prometheus' science and resources to develop new "neutraceuticals", perhaps even some that would merit full-blown clinical development through the FDA approval process.

The Bottom Line
Only time will tell whether acquiring Prometheus is just a means for Nestle to expand its nutrition sales channels, an entry into the pharmaceutical and diagnostics markets, or a mistaken attempt at diversification. However, if it's successful, it raises the interesting possibility that other food companies like Kellogg (NYSE:K) or Kraft (NYSE:KFT) will look to the medicine cabinet as a future avenue to growth. (For more, see A Checklist For Successful Medical Technology Investment.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

Related Articles
  1. Fundamental Analysis

    5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

    Focusing on certain fundamental metrics is the best way for value investors to cash in gains. Here are the most important metrics to know.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  3. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  4. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  5. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  6. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  7. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Micro Cap Alternative Energy Stocks for 2016 (AMSC, SLTD)

    Follow a cautious approach when purchasing micro-cap stocks in the alternative energy sector. Learn about five alternative energy micro-caps worth considering.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Porter's Five Forces on Under Armour (UA)

    Learn about Under Armour and how it differentiates itself in the competitive athletic apparel industry in light of the Porter's Five Forces Model.
  9. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Risks of Investing in Qualcomm Stock (QCOM, BRCM)

    Understand the long-term fundamental risks related to investing in Qualcomm stock, and how financial ratios also play into the investment consideration.
  10. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Risks of Investing in Johnson & Johnson Stock (JNJ)

    Learn the largest risks to investing in Johnson & Johnson through fundamental analysis and other potential risks. Also discover how JNJ compares to its peers.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the formula for calculating EBITDA?

    When analyzing financial fitness, corporate accountants and investors alike closely examine a company's financial statements ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How do I calculate the P/E ratio of a company?

    The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is a valuation measure that compares the level of stock prices to the level of corporate ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do you calculate return on equity (ROE)?

    Return on equity (ROE) is a ratio that provides investors insight into how efficiently a company (or more specifically, its ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do you calculate working capital?

    Working capital represents the difference between a firm’s current assets and current liabilities. The challenge can be determining ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the formula for calculating the current ratio?

    The current ratio is a financial ratio that investors and analysts use to examine the liquidity of a company and its ability ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the formula for calculating earnings per share (EPS)?

    Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of a company’s profit that is allocated to each outstanding share of common stock, ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center