With the Chapter 11 bankruptcy auction of defunct battery developer A123's (OTC:AONEQ) commercial assets now complete, the story is over and common shareholders will walk away with a total loss. Not only does the A123 story serve as a bitter reminder of the sizable hurdles that new energy-tech companies must face, but also the dangers of buying into the hype at the cost of scientific and economic realities.

Guide To Oil And Gas Plays: We've got your comprehensive guide to oil and gas shales in North America.

Wanxiang Walks Away with the Assets
With the completion of the auction of A123's commercial assets this weekend, China's Wanxiang has emerged as the winner. Despite expressions of interest from Siemens (NYSE:SI) and Johnson Controls (NYSE:JCI), nobody was willing to top Wanxiang's $257 million bid, who have agreed to fund their subsidiary Wanxiang Clean Energy USA Corp with about $350,000,000 in cash prior to or at the closing of the asset acquisition.

Assuming that the bankruptcy judge approves the transaction (and there's little reason to expect otherwise), the deal will go through. Unfortunately for shareholders, A123 went into bankruptcy with about $376 million in liabilities and between the Wanxiang bid and a trivial amount agreed to in a separate deal for A123's military/government-related assets, there will be over $100 million in net liabilities left, meaning that shareholders will get absolutely nothing in the liquidation.

Should Johnson Controls Have Stepped up?
I do find it somewhat interesting that Johnson Controls didn't try harder to win these assets. Johnson Controls is also working on advanced lithium-ion batteries for the automotive market, and certainly could have used A123's lithium nanophosphate technology.

While there were clearly problems with A123's cost structure, the technology still holds promise. Advanced automobile manufacturer Fisker has already leaned heavily on A123's technology, and major automakers like GM (NYSE:GM) and Fiat's (OTC:FIATY) Chrysler had shown more than just passing interest in the technology. With Johnson Control's better scale and ongoing development budget, I believe the company could have taken the technology in some interesting (and, ultimately, profitable) directions.

Clearly Johnson Controls thought so too, to a point. Johnson Controls had initially reached an agreement with A123 to buy these assets in bankruptcy for $125 million (and debtor-in-possession financing), only to be outbid in the auction. By no means do I wish to criticize Johnson Control for showing price discipline, but I have to ask whether an extra $130 million, or so, really should have been a deal-breaker and whether they can replicate or surmount A123's technology for that incremental sum.

A123's Story Is All Too Familiar
Although the A123 story should be a lesson to future energy-tech investors, I have been doing this too long to really believe that it will be. Time and time again, investors get caught up in the excitement and potential of new energy stories without appreciating the sizable hurdles in technology, engineering and commercialization.

It wasn't so long ago, really, that companies like Ballard Power (Nasdaq:BLDP), Beacon Power (OTC:BCONQ), Mechanical Technology (OTC:MKTY), Active Power (Nasdaq:ACPW) and Plug Power (Nasdaq:PLUG) were "going to change everything." Unfortunately, none of these companies have really made much of a mark and the sum total of their market caps today is less than what Wanxiang is paying for A123's assets.

In the case of A123, investors underestimated just how difficult and expensive it is to develop differentiated battery technology and just how risk-averse automobile OEMs can be when it comes to incorporating new technology. Likewise, A123's management wasn't always exactly rational about its own prospects - Wanxiang had offered A123 $465 million for a controlling interest, a pesky surplus item on an income statement, not all that long ago but A123 refused.

The Bottom Line
There are plenty of lessons to take from the A123 story, and many questions still worth asking. Why wasn't Johnson Controls willing to go higher in its bid? Are Chinese companies like Wanxiang and BYD (OTC:BYDDY) really establishing themselves as potential players in electric vehicles down the road? Will investors ever learn that buying stock in bankrupt companies is virtually always just a ticket to a total wipeout?

Whatever the case may be, A123 now solidifies its place in history as another risky tech stock that simply couldn't deliver on the promise of its patents and technologies.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Will J.C. Penney Come Back in 2016? (JCP)

    J.C. Penney is without a doubt turning itself around, but that doesn't guarantee the stock will respond immediately.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  3. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  4. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  5. Economics

    Is Wall Street Living in Denial?

    Will remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
  6. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  7. Investing News

    How AT&T Evolved into a Mobile Phone Giant

    A third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Yelp: Can it Regain its Losses in 2016? (YELP)

    Yelp investors have had reason to be happy recently. Will the good spirits last?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center