Last week, Japanese mobile phone firm Softbank announced that it would be acquiring a 70% interest in mobile phone giant Sprint (NYSE:S). Sprint is the third-largest wireless provider in the United States, but along with any player not in the top two, has been struggling to grow and also remain profitable in what has become a two-tiered industry of leaders and laggards.

Investopedia Broker Guide: Enhance your trading with the tools from today's top online brokers

Smaller Players Making Moves
The Softbank (OTC:SFTBF) and Sprint agreement represents the latest attempt by a smaller player to improve its competitive position. Earlier in the month, T-Mobile USA, which is the fourth largest domestic player behind Sprint, announced it would be purchasing MetroPCS (NYSE:PCS) by issuing shares and cash of $1.5 billion. T-Mobile agreed to be purchased by AT&T (NYSE:T) for $39 billion last year, but the deal was nixed by regulators that have decided AT&T and Verizon (NYSE:VZ) have grown so dominant that they could end up putting the smaller players out of business.

Sprint appears to also be worried about its competitive position and agreed to the Softbank deal to gain access to a deeper-pocketed partner. Upgrading cellular networks requires billions of investment dollars. It was difficult for Sprint to support because it is much less profitable than either AT&T or Verizon. Over the past year, Sprint has reported operating losses. In stark contrast, AT&T's operating margin over the past five years has averaged 11%; Verizon's is even better at closer to 12%.

SEE: The Wonderful World Of Mergers

What MetroPCS Brings to T-Mobile
MetroPCS's operating margin is actually quite impressive at around 15%. Its focus on lower-end price points, such as prepaid phones, is a profitable niche. At the end of 2011, it had 9.3 million subscribers. Combined with T-Mobile, the total combined subscribers are estimated at 42.5 million. Sprint is third with an estimated 56.4 million subscribers. Both are still dwarfed by Verizon at more than 94 million subscribers. AT&T is even larger and passed 100 million subscribers during the third quarter of 2011.

Sprint had tried to develop one of the first 4G networks to allow for the faster downloading of content that smartphones demand and did so through a major investment in Clearwire (Nasdaq:CLWR). Clearwire has built an extensive network and Sprint acquired a 48% interest in the firm, but the move failed to win a significant number of new customers. Verizon and AT&T also now offer extensive 4G markets.

SEE: Analyzing Operating Margins

Industry Trends
The recent M&A activity in the industry demonstrates that the smaller players are doing what they can to better compete in the marketplace. There is little denying that their business models are at risk. In contrast, AT&T and Verizon have the profits to pay above-average dividends to shareholders, and invest billions each year to maintain and upgrade their networks.

The U.S. market does appear to benefit customers. A recent academic study found that the U.S. leads the world in terms of offering affordable mobile plans. Some will argue that the value is sufficient, given that some networks have failed to keep up with the data needs of smartphones, but there are a wide mix of plans based on monthly budgets. The study also found that, despite the concentration in the top two players, most consumers have a choice of roughly five providers that must compete for business.

The Bottom Line
Despite the array of plan providers, the study did reiterate that smaller players are struggling to compete. AT&T and Verizon have also been aggressive in acquiring wireless spectrum to support future voice and data bandwidth. They also have the deep pockets to keep acquiring spectrum. Combined with Sprint and T-Mobile, the top four players control an estimated 90% of the market. U.S. Cellular (NYSE:USM) and Leap Wireless (Nasdaq:LEAP) remain two of the few remaining independent players. Softbank may give Sprint the capital to further consolidate the market.

At the time of writing, Ryan Fuhrmann did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  3. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  5. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  6. Stock Analysis

    Tech Stocks Vs. Financial Stocks in 2016

    Consider the arguments for allocating more of your investment portfolio to either the technology sector or the financial sector for 2016.
  7. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  10. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center