Question: Did Facebook and its investors have realistic expectations for the company's growth potential?

Bear's Response
"What's wrong with Facebook (Nasdaq:FB)?" is probably one of the most popular themes in financial/investment writing these days. The poor performance of this stock post-IPO has plenty of people speculating that there was a social media bubble (and that the bubble is now deflating), and now there are rumblings that Facebook is already on the wrong side of its growth curve. While I do think a lot of the pessimism and criticism of Facebook is overheated click-bait, I do believe that the company is growing more slowly than investors expected, and investors may want to take a closer look at some reasons to avoid Facebook.

Investopedia Broker Guides: Enhance your trading with the tools from today's top online brokers.

A Challenging Transition Is Underway
Part of the difficulty Facebook is seeing with its growth is the transition to a higher percentage of mobile access in the usage base. As investors could see in the S-1, mobile is not as profitable for Facebook and may never be. At a minimum, it forces the company to reconsider and reconfigure how it approaches this customer base. Investor expectations aren't helping matters. Similar to OpenTable (Nasdaq:OPEN) and Groupon (Nasdaq:GRPN), investors and analysts appeared to get carried away with extrapolating the initial hyper-growth into the future. Apparently, nobody stopped to consider just how much time productive adults can spend on Facebook and how many ads Facebook can cram onto the site.

How Many Opportunities Are There to Ring the Register?
Insofar as North American users are concerned, I'm not sure how much growth is left in the tank. Supposedly, more than 40% of Americans have an account and I have to wonder why anybody who doesn't currently have one would create one. That means that Facebook needs to figure out new ways to monetize the users it has, especially since it's something that can make or break Facebook.

Sponsored stories are one of the most recent examples of Facebook's attempts to create new revenue generation. Likewise, the company is looking at other sorts of new ad formats and opportunities to produce revenue. One of the key questions, though, is the efficacy of those ads - do ads on Facebook really pay for themselves in terms of driving sales for the advertisers. If Facebook goes too far with papering the page with ads, they risk conditioning users toward ignoring all of them.

Enterprise social media could likewise prove a tough nut to crack. I can understand why enterprise CIOs and senior managers do not like Facebook - it gobbles up system resources (and employee time), it creates the potential to embarrass the company and it isn't especially useful for office collaboration. In contrast, companies like IBM (NYSE:IBM) and Jive Software (Nasdaq:JIVE) are moving ahead with enterprise social media platforms that take a lot of the benefits of a platform like Facebook, but actually make it useful.

Are the Natives Getting Restless?
Closely tied to the potential for new ad opportunities is the issue of the user experience and user satisfaction. Facebook users think of themselves as customers, not product, and the company has to maintain a delicate balancing act to preserve that fiction. Along those lines, analysts and commentators have started speculating that Facebook is losing its cache. While Google's (Nasdaq:GOOG) Google+ is not a credible threat, Twitter can be.

Given that no sell-side models I've seen yet on Facebook incorporate any sort of explicit "user fatigue" function, this could be another source of potential growth disappointment. That puts more onus on the company to develop features and applications that will keep the user engaged, and that all costs money.

The Bottom Line
All of the doom and gloom around Facebook is probably a good thing for the future, as it is part of the process of washing out overheated expectations built up during the long run up to Facebook going public. That said, the basic reality still holds that investors have likely significantly overestimated Facebook's growth and now find themselves disappointed with that growth. It is not the fault of the company that analysts and investors went off the reservation with their growth estimates, there were plenty of warnings in the company's S-1, but whomever's fault it was is irrelevant - investors are now reassessing the real growth potential of Facebook and that has led to some painful realizations about the stock's value.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Don't forget to read the Bull Side of this debate and weigh in with your opinion below.

Related Articles
  1. Chart Advisor

    Rare Earth Metals Continue To Struggle

    Rare earth metals are used in many of today's products and many investors are wondering if consumer demand is enough to offset the global economic slowdown. We'll take a look at how they are ...
  2. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Apple Shareholders

    Learn about insiders and institutional investors with large positions in Apple. Read about Carl Icahn's activist campaign against Apple.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Will J.C. Penney Come Back in 2016? (JCP)

    J.C. Penney is without a doubt turning itself around, but that doesn't guarantee the stock will respond immediately.
  4. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 ETFs to Track the Nasdaq in 2016

    Check out five ETFs tracking the NASDAQ that investors should consider heading into 2016, including the famous PowerShares QQQ Trust.
  5. Investing

    In Search of the Rate-Proof Portfolio

    After October’s better-than-expected employment report, a December Federal Reserve (Fed) liftoff is looking more likely than it was earlier this fall.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  7. Personal Finance

    How Tech Can Help with 3 Behavioral Finance Biases

    Even if you’re a finance or statistics expert, you’re not immune to common decision-making mistakes that can negatively impact your finances.
  8. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  9. Investing

    How to Spot Secular Bull Markets vs. Secular Bear Markets

    A guide to identifying secular bull and bear markets.
  10. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center