Relative to companies like Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL) and IBM (NYSE:IBM), Microsoft (Nasdaq:MSFT) is perhaps not as acquisitive as investors might expect for a company of its size. Coupled with top-line growth that is not exactly robust, it would seem to set up the question as to why Microsoft isn't more active. Perhaps the announcement of a $6 billion goodwill writedown in the Online Services business goes some way toward explaining it.

Investopedia Broker Guides: Enhance your trading with the tools from today's top online brokers.

Paying the Price for a Bad Deal ... Twice
When Microsoft acquired aQuantive for $6.3 billion in 2007, there were a few objections to the hefty price tag (approximately 14 times sales, and an 85% premium). Bulls countered that it was a necessary deal for Microsoft to carve out an attractive position in the fast-growing online advertising space that companies like Google (Nasdaq:GOOG) and Yahoo! (Nasdaq:YHOO) also coveted.

SEE: Advertising, Crocodiles And Moats

Unfortunately, this deal has never really worked out. Microsoft continues to trail Google in the online ad space (and by a sizable margin), and Microsoft's online business has never shown all that much momentum or strength. And now another nail is being hammered home. As part of the company's year-end audit process, the company is required to test the goodwill it carries as an asset on its balance sheet. The details of this process go beyond this article, but Microsoft has determined that the earnings potential and carrying value of the asset is not what it once was. As a result, the company will write down $6.2 billion of the goodwill carried in the online services business. This charge will not affect the cash earnings of the business, nor is it likely have any meaningful influence on future growth expectations.

SEE: Can You Count On Goodwill?

Another Reminder That Value Matters?
Microsoft isn't the first company to see a major write-down tied to an ill-fated acquisition, and it most certainly won't be the last. There are already some signs, for instance, that Hewlett-Packard's (NYSE:HPQ) acquisition of Autonomy has not gone completely to plan and that HP may have overpaid.

This is especially an issue with growing software companies - much of the value lies in company reputation, employee expertise and other intangible assets. What's more, growth is so highly prized by the Street that these assets seldom trade cheap.

SEE: Did Facebook Overpay For Instagram?

It doesn't help matters that it can be difficult to trace back the true value added by deals. Google's ongoing online success has seemingly made the price paid for DoubleClick a moot point, and it must be noted that Microsoft has done numerous small deals over the years - many of which have been worthwhile. If there's any lesson, then, it may just be that paying high premiums meaningfully increases the risk of the deal. This is hardly a revelation, but it does seem to be a lesson that bears repeating to company CEOs.

SEE: Biggest Merger And Acquisition Disasters

The Bottom Line
Time will tell if Microsoft's Skype deal ultimately follows the same path as aQuantive did. At a minimum, the difficulties in making a go of the online services business should serve as a warning to those pushing for the company to acquire Nokia (NYSE:NOK) or Research In Motion (Nasdaq:RIMM) as a way to close the gap with Apple (Nasdaq:AAPL). Although Oracle and IBM have arguably done well with deals that looked a little pricey at the time, they were at least deals that fit in with pre-existing competencies at both companies.

The final accounting aftermath of a deal long since recognized as unsuccessful really has no bearing on Microsoft's ongoing value. Microsoft remains a company that looks undervalued, but also deficient in growth - a difficult combination in tech. While patient investors may see this value come to fruition, there could be more risks here if management gets impatient and tries to use additional high-value deals to boost its growth rate.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    Understanding Cost-Volume Profit Analysis

    Business managers use cost-volume profit analysis to gauge the profitability of their company’s products or services.
  2. Fundamental Analysis

    5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

    Focusing on certain fundamental metrics is the best way for value investors to cash in gains. Here are the most important metrics to know.
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  4. Investing

    What Investors Need to Know About Returns in 2016

    Last year wasn’t a great one for investors seeking solid returns, so here are three things we believe all investors need to know about returns in 2016.
  5. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  7. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  8. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Micro Cap Alternative Energy Stocks for 2016 (AMSC, SLTD)

    Follow a cautious approach when purchasing micro-cap stocks in the alternative energy sector. Learn about five alternative energy micro-caps worth considering.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Porter's Five Forces on Under Armour (UA)

    Learn about Under Armour and how it differentiates itself in the competitive athletic apparel industry in light of the Porter's Five Forces Model.
  10. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Risks of Investing in Qualcomm Stock (QCOM, BRCM)

    Understand the long-term fundamental risks related to investing in Qualcomm stock, and how financial ratios also play into the investment consideration.
RELATED FAQS
  1. What is the formula for calculating EBITDA?

    When analyzing financial fitness, corporate accountants and investors alike closely examine a company's financial statements ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. How do I calculate the P/E ratio of a company?

    The price-earnings ratio (P/E ratio) is a valuation measure that compares the level of stock prices to the level of corporate ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do you calculate return on equity (ROE)?

    Return on equity (ROE) is a ratio that provides investors insight into how efficiently a company (or more specifically, its ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How do you calculate working capital?

    Working capital represents the difference between a firm’s current assets and current liabilities. The challenge can be determining ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What is the formula for calculating the current ratio?

    The current ratio is a financial ratio that investors and analysts use to examine the liquidity of a company and its ability ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the formula for calculating earnings per share (EPS)?

    Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of a company’s profit that is allocated to each outstanding share of common stock, ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center