It's starting to look as though those tech companies reporting late in the cycle have better news to give to the Street, as Cisco's (Nasdaq:CSCO) earnings report was decent and now so too was NetApp's (Nasdaq:NTAP). Although it's an open question as to whether much share is shifting between EMC (NYSE:EMC) and NetApp, both companies seem to be putting lesser competitors further and further behind. While there's definitely a risk that the near-term IT spending environment could worsen, NetApp still looks attractively-priced as a growth play on enterprise storage.

Applying The MACD Indicator With MetaTrader 4: How to use MetaTrader 4, a trading platform used for online trading in the forex, CFD and futures markets.

A Solid Fiscal Second Quarter in a Twitchy Market
In a more bullish market, NetApp's quarter probably wouldn't get nearly so much positive attention. As it stands today, however, an in-line quarter is a pretty strong result in a market where analysts and investors seem to be perpetually wincing in anticipation of the next bit of bad news.

Revenue rose about 2% as reported (and about 7% on a sequential basis), just barely beating the average sell-side estimate. Product revenue fell 2% (but rose 11% sequentially), and management's indicated that there was good unit growth on both the low end (the 2000) and the high end (the 6000), suggesting some pressure on the 3000 series. Overall, NetApp's product revenue performance wasn't markedly different than that of EMC for this quarter.

NetApp also did pretty well on margins and profits. Gross margin did worsen from last year (by more than a point), but improved about a half-point sequentially, and hard drive costs seem under control. On the operating line, NetApp saw a sizable year-on-year decline (27%), but good sequential growth (up 54%), and operating margin worsened significantly on an annual basis but likewise improved sequentially. While the reported numbers for the adjusted/non-GAAP calculations were of course different, the changes were directionally very similar (particularly at the margin lines).

Separating from the Pack
Based on the past few quarters, it increasingly sounds like the biggest shifts in the storage market are not between EMC and NetApp, but rather between EMC/NetApp and other large hardware providers. IBM (NYSE:IBM) saw a double-digit decline in storage for its third quarter, and I won't be surprised if Dell (Nasdaq:DELL) and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE:HPQ) likewise continue to lose ground and cede share.

That isn't to say that NetApp is not looking to challenge and apply pressure to EMC. Partnerships with Fusion-io (NYSE:FIO) and Cisco could prove to be significant as time rolls on, particularly given that the dissolution of the once-strong relationship between EMC and Cisco has likely created some bad feelings.

We're Not in the Clear Yet
NetApp posted a respectable quarter and relieved some investor worries, but that's not say that it's smooth sailing from here. For starters, it looks like the company got a nice boost from the end-of-year budget flush from government customers. What's more, Europe is still weak and there hasn't been a lot of optimism lately from Fortune 500 companies on their spending plans for 2013.

The Bottom Line
I will be a little surprised if NetApp is still independent in five years. Given the growth and significance of storage within the IT spending food chain, NetApp could make sense to multiple companies (including IBM and HP, as well as more long-shot ideas such as Cisco, Oracle (Nasdaq:ORCL) and current EMC partner Lenovo (OTC:LNVGY)).

Here and now, NetApp looks too cheap. If NetApp can grow its free cash flow at a long-term rate of 6-8%, the shares should be trading considerably higher than they are today. In fact, strip away all of the cash and project less than 4% growth and the stock still looks undervalued by perhaps 10% today. While I chose EMC for my own portfolio, that was as much about portfolio construction and risk/volatility balance as the relative quality of the two companies. While NetApp is likely to be a riskier and more volatile pick than EMC, I think NetApp is a very interesting stock to consider today.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson owned shares of EMC since September 2012.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  2. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  3. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  4. Economics

    Is Wall Street Living in Denial?

    Will remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
  5. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  6. Investing News

    How AT&T Evolved into a Mobile Phone Giant

    A third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Yelp: Can it Regain its Losses in 2016? (YELP)

    Yelp investors have had reason to be happy recently. Will the good spirits last?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  10. Stock Analysis

    GoPro's Stock: Can it Fall Much Further? (GPRO)

    As a company that primarily sells discretionary products, GoPro and its potential falls right in line with consumer trends. Is that good or bad?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center