Dutch conglomerate Koninklijke Philips (NYSE:PHG) has been an underachiever for so long now, it hardly seems fair to call another poor quarter a "disappointment." Nevertheless, the company announced that its fourth quarter results would be meaningfully short of analyst expectations and the stock is weak once again. Although Philips may remain a fixture on the "due for a turnaround" lists, investors would do well to stay skeptical about this company's ability to compete as currently constructed. (For more, see Earning Forecasts: A Primer.)

Investopedia Markets: Explore the best one-stop source for financial news, quotes and insights.

Another Warning
Although estimates have come down as much as one-third over the last quarter, Philips still found a way to underperform in the fourth quarter. Management guidance suggests that sales will come in a few percentage points below expectations, while margins fell off even worse. Based on an informal survey of sell side analyst expectations, it looks like Philips' anticipated EBITDA of 500 million euros will be some 10-20% short of estimates.

Philips definitely blamed Europe as a source of weakness and that's not altogether surprising. Western Europe is about one-third of the company's revenue base and there's no strength in any of Philips' core markets. Lighting is weak on lower consumer spending and lower construction activity, while healthcare is coming under significant pricing and margin pressure as nationalized healthcare systems press for relief. Consumer electronics is likewise soft in Europe on those same consumer spending issues.

It doesn't look like this is just a Europe problem, though. The market for capital healthcare equipment in the U.S. really isn't that strong, except for some significant productivity or traffic-generating features (like Intuitive Surgical's (Nasdaq:ISRG) robots). Likewise, other LED players like Cree (Nasdaq:CREE) also aren't seeing especially healthy demand at this time.

Longer Term Reasons For Worry
Missing one quarter is not really a reason for panic, but Philips has far-reaching problems that have lingered for some time now and frankly, seem to be getting worse.

The LED/lighting business is really just not working out for anybody right now. The aforementioned Cree is off its lows, but the stock is just a shadow of its 2009/2010 self when LED was all the rage. Likewise, General Electric (NYSE:GE) and Siemens (NYSE:SI) aren't making much money in lighting either, and both would like to be rid of these businesses. Granted, construction activity has been really weak, but if neither GE or Siemens think they can make significant returns over the long haul in lighting, why will Philips be successful?

Healthcare is another place where Philips looks increasingly vulnerable. The company does have a good position in CT and MRI imaging, but the company looks vulnerable to GE and Toshiba (OTCBB:TOSBF.PK) in North America and Mindray Medical (NYSE:MR) in China. Elsewhere, companies like Hologic (Nasdaq:HOLX) are chipping away at the company's franchise and the entry of Samsung into healthcare "Big Iron" is a major threat.

Then there's the matter of consumer electronics. Philips has maintained at least some of its legacy as a forward-thinking product developer, but like Sony (NYSE:SNE), it seems Philips is in a losing battle with companies like LG and Samsung.

The Bottom Line
Even with the weakness in these shares, I can't really come up with a solid reason to own them today. The enterprise multiple ratio is below six (often a good buy point), but the company's returns on capital, margins and free cash flow production are pretty pathetic right now. What's worse, the company's management doesn't seem to have a lot to offer in terms of how or why things are going to get better anytime soon. While there are some positive qualities to build on, including good emerging market exposure and brand value, what's the plan for building on them?

Assuming a 3% forward growth rate in revenue and some improvement in free cash flow margin (actually doubling the very low 10-year average), fair value seems to lie in the mid-to-high teens. Those are conservative assumptions, but with stagnant management and a lack of initiatives for improving operating performance, it's hard to argue for more. (For additional reading, check out 5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center