There are not many freebies in oil and gas, so if an investor wants to own an E&P company trading at a low valuation, there is a price to be paid in quality. The question with Norway's Statoil (NYSE:STO) is just how much of a discount is really fair. Although Statoil does indeed have issues with its cost structure and reserve base, the company's above-average growth potential and capacity for additional deals argues that the discount today is too steep.

Investopedia Markets: Explore the best one-stop source for financial news, quotes and insights.

Familiar Problems Show up in Q4
Statoil's fourth quarter results weren't too surprising to long-term followers of this story. Although production slightly beat expectations, it grew less than 1% overall, as declines in Norwegian production offset better than 25% growth from international projects.

Profitability is still a concern as well. While net results looked good due to a lower-than-expected tax rate, the so-called "clean" EBIT missed expectations by about 4%. The miss was driven entirely by the international operations, were a variety of costs and claims pressured margins. (For related reading, see A Look At Corporate Profit Margins.)

Modest Growth Expectations For Now
Statoil had logged several years of unimpressive reserve replacement, but 2011's results were better than 100% (117%). With a level of reserves that are fairly low in absolute terms, that's no minor accomplishment. Moreover, management did reiterate an expectation to average about 3% production growth out through 2020.

That doesn't sound great, but a little perspective is in order. Compared to other majors like Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM), ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) or Total (NYSE:TOT), these are actually pretty solid results and put Statoil near the top of the chart in terms of growth potential.

What's more, Statoil is investing heavily in exploration and growth through the drillbit, and early results have been encouraging. While finding large reserves of natural gas in Africa is a mixed blessing (since it will require expensive processing and transportation), oil discoveries haven't been too bad either.

What About the Costs?
Perhaps the biggest issue for Statoil is the cost of this oncoming production. While Statoil may score well in terms of production growth expectations, it does not score nearly so well in terms of finding and development or cash production costs.

Part of the problem is how and where the company operates. Statoil is an expert in offshore and harsh environment production; while this means that Statoil can find and deliver oil where others simply lack the ability to go, it comes at a higher cost. If oil prices stay high, that may not matter much, but oil prices much below $75 a barrel put this company in the unenviable place of spending more than average to make less than average.

At the same time, there is a risk that the company overspends to add reserves. The deal for Brigham brought the company good exposure to unconventional oil in the Bakken, and a deal with Chesapeake (NYSE:CHK) likewise gave it a stake in the Marcellus. But these deals were not cheap and it remains to be seen if there's a compelling long-term return case to make for Statoil continuing to write fat checks for unconventional U.S. plays.

The Bottom Line
I don't necessarily believe that there's a proper price for every stock, as some companies are just garbage. I do believe, though, that there is a point where companies like Statoil are unfairly or unreasonably discounted on the basis of the operational shortcomings.

Major oil and gas companies are trading for around 4.5 to 6 times 2012 EBTIDA estimates, while Statoil trades at less than half of that. Is Statoil truly less than half as good as Exxon or Total? I accept that the company has too little in reserves and needs to jettison low-return assets in the North Sea. But I don't accept that the company's prospects are so poor as to be truly worthy of such a low multiple. While I'd probably want to pair a buy of Statoil with one or two other names (like Apache (NYSE:APA) or maybe another U.S./European major), I think this is a stock worth a serious look today. (For related reading, see A Clear Look At EBITDA.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

At the time of writing, Stephen Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Products and Investments

    Cash vs. Stocks: How to Decide Which is Best

    Is it better to keep your money in cash or is a down market a good time to buy stocks at a lower cost?
  2. Investing News

    Who Does Cheap Oil Benefit? See This Stock (DG)

    Cheap oil won't benefit most companies, but this retailer might buck that trend.
  3. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  4. Stock Analysis

    Performance Review: Emerging Markets Equities in 2015

    Find out why emerging markets struggled in 2015 and why a half-decade long trend of poor returns is proving optimistic growth investors wrong.
  5. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
  6. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why the Bullish Are Turning Bearish

    Banks are reducing their targets for the S&P 500 for 2016. Here's why.
  8. Stock Analysis

    How to Find Quality Stocks Amid the Wreckage

    Finding companies with good earnings and hitting on all cylinders in this environment, although possible, is not easy.
  9. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Platinum Penny Stocks for 2016 (PLG, XPL)

    Examine five penny stocks in the platinum mining business that investors may wish to consider adding to their investment portfolios for 2016.
  10. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center