It's not especially fun to watch a one-time blue chip lose its luster, but there's no point in denying that that's what's happening with Sysco (NYSE:SYY) right now. While Sysco is still the dominant food distributor in the country, that dominance seems to be worth less and less as investors see the limits of the company's ability to fight against the tide. This company will have its good days again, but I would suggest that the premium that the company has long enjoyed for its market power and stable growth should be re-evaluated.

Investopedia Broker Guides: Enhance your trading with the tools from today's top online brokers.

More of the Same in Third Quarter
Not a lot changed in Sysco's third quarter, and that's unfortunate given the recent trends in the business. Revenue rose more than 7% as reported, while "real" revenue growth was closer to 2%. Organic case volume of 2.3% was not bad, given that overall restaurant traffic was down a bit in the quarter.

Cost inflation continues to be a major factor in this story. Sysco reported 5.5% food cost inflation as part of its revenue growth, fueled in part by the double-digit price increases that companies like Tyson (NYSE:TSN) and Smithfield (NYSE:SFD) have pushed through in proteins. Other cost items like fuel and bad debt are also taking their toll, though.

Gross margin slipped a point from last year, and reported operating income fell 5%. While core expenses were up about 3% (as opposed to the nearly 5% reported increase), the company is under pressure on several fronts. Not only is the company still struggling to implement a new ERP system, but the numbers suggest that even mighty Sysco has to use aggressive pricing to protect market share.

SEE: Understanding The Income Statement

Too Many of the Wrong Customers?
Food cost inflation, ERP implementation difficulties and restaurant traffic trends are known issues. I also wonder, though, if the changing dynamics of the restaurant industry are taking their toll. Quick service restaurants (QSR) like McDonald's (NYSE:MCD), Panera (Nasdaq:PNRA) and Chipotle's (NYSE:CMG) are taking more and more share of the restaurant industry, pressuring not only locally-owned restaurants, but national chains as well.

Why would this matter? Well, Joe's Pizza is a price-taker when it comes to Sysco (outside of some ability to choose amongst other distributors), but McDonald's, Yum Brands (NYSE:YUM) and other large QSR chains have a great deal of more leverage when it comes to terms. I also wonder if the relatively more limited menus of QSRs is an issue as well - Sysco still has to maintain a large selection of product, but may be seeing more and more sales come from a narrow list of items where the margins are likely narrower.

Can Sysco Reclaim the Execution Story?
Sysco has long been a story dominated by the company's seemingly limitless ability to drive more efficiencies and synergies through aggressive cost-containment and mergers and acquisitions. Now the company seems to have run out of slack to take up.

To be fair, there are ample reasons to think that Sysco can recover and get back on its former track. This is still a very tough economy, with consumers turning to private label brands and QSR value menus to stretch their budgets. Hopefully this won't last forever. What's more, Sysco's competitors lack the same scale and synergies and can only try to fight on price for just so long.

SEE: Analyzing An Acquisition Announcement

The Bottom Line
Sysco' stock has been in a downward trend since early 2004, a trend that I believe has been fueled by valuation resets as the company's growth rate has increasingly started to match the market. These resets are painful for long-term shareholders, but companies like this often regain a growth trajectory that, while not matching the past, do provide solid long-term returns.

I'm not sure if Sysco's performance has finally shaken out the investors who believed the stock was worth a double-digit EV/EBITDA ratio, but valuation has definitely compressed. I don't think investors need to buy in today, but I think the stock is getting incrementally closer to becoming a solid long-term story once again.

SEE: 5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center