Institutional investors seem to approach energy stocks with the same sort of discipline and dedication that teenaged girls show towards boy bands and pop stars. Whatever was popular last year isn't going to be hot this year, but there's not always a lot of logic in the process. Talisman Energy (NYSE:TLM) does have real challenges that merit a discount, but it seems as though the Street has gone a little overboard here and patient investors may want to consider the name.

Investopedia Broker Guides: Enhance your trading with the tools from today's top online brokers.

A Cold Wind from the North Sea
A fair bit of Talisman's problems stem from the North Sea, where the company has had some substantial execution issues and setbacks. These issues have not only cost the company money, but have also led to a lower production growth outlook for 2012, diminished confidence in management and significantly less belief in the idea that Talisman can harvest reliable cash flow from these operations and use them to fund growth-oriented projects in U.S. shales, Southeast Asia and the Kurdistan region of Iraq.

As it happens, these difficulties (and the overall challenges that energy companies are facing with funding their growth projects) have led management to contemplate selling as much as half of its interests in those North Sea properties. Geographical proximity would make ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), BHP Billiton (NYSE:BHP), Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE:RDS.A, RDS.B), Statoil (NYSE:STO) and Apache (NYSE:APA) at least potentially interested parties. Given Talisman's problems, that could make a tie-up with Apache or Statoil especially appealing, as they have expertise in difficult environments or projects and could perhaps restore some stability to the outlook here.

SEE: Oil And Gas Industry Primer

No Credit
Even outside of the company's North Sea struggles, it seems as though Talisman gets little credit for its other operations. While the company had once made much of its potential growth in unconventional gas, management has also seen to the liquids side of the business; production is still fairly close to 50/50 and the company has a path to double-digit liquids growth over the next three to five years.

Eagle Ford has been a pretty promising area for Talisman, but the company scarcely gets the sort of credit for it that others like Cabot (NYSE:COG) and EOG (NYSE:EOG) have received. Likewise, while I could understand some discounts for political risk tied to the company's operations in Colombia, Vietnam, Papua New Guinea and Kurdistan, the implied discounts seem well in excess of the production growth and return potential.

SEE: Earning Forecasts: A Primer

Slim Down or Push on?
To go back to the point I made in the open, investors vacillate between favoring focused "pure play" exploration and production companies and those with broad international footprints. Right now, the diversified companies like Apache, Statoil and Talisman are out of favor.

The question, though, is how much management ought to accommodate the whims of the Street. Finding a partner in the North Sea certainly makes sense, and it's not hard to argue for selling it outright. Likewise, there are non-core assets like the company's operations in Peru that may be worth more to someone else.

But when it comes to operations in areas like Colombia, Kurdistan, Vietnam and the unconventional shales of America, Talisman is probably better-served sticking to its guns. Certainly the company needs to carefully steward its capital resources (especially with oil prices falling), but an aggressive divestiture program at a time when valuations are so low would do little to help shareholders for the long term.

SEE: 5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

The Bottom Line
By almost any reasonable fundamental standard, Talisman shares seem too cheap. If the company merits an average forward EBITDA multiple (on par with Apache), fair value lies around $15.50. Even if investors believe that Talisman should be punished for its execution issues, production growth and finding and development cost prospects, it's still not hard at all to produce a target above $13 per share. Although owning any energy company in a period of falling prices (and falling confidence) is a dicey proposition, Talisman looks like a name where there's more than meets the eye for patient investors.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    Latest Labor Numbers: Good News for the Market?

    Some economic numbers are indicating that the labor market is outperforming the stock market. Should investors be bullish?
  2. Investing News

    Stocks with Big Dividend Yields: 'It's a Trap!'

    Should you seek high yielding-dividend stocks in the current investment environment?
  3. Investing News

    Should You Be Betting with Buffett Right Now?

    Following Warren Buffett's stock picks has historically been a good strategy. Is considering his biggest holdings in 2016 a good idea?
  4. Products and Investments

    Cash vs. Stocks: How to Decide Which is Best

    Is it better to keep your money in cash or is a down market a good time to buy stocks at a lower cost?
  5. Investing News

    Who Does Cheap Oil Benefit? See This Stock (DG)

    Cheap oil won't benefit most companies, but this retailer might buck that trend.
  6. Investing

    How to Ballast a Portfolio with Bonds

    If January and early February performance is any guide, there’s a new normal in financial markets today: Heightened volatility.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Performance Review: Emerging Markets Equities in 2015

    Find out why emerging markets struggled in 2015 and why a half-decade long trend of poor returns is proving optimistic growth investors wrong.
  8. Investing News

    Today's Sell-off: Are We in a Margin Liquidation?

    If we're in market liquidation, is it good news or bad news? That party depends on your timeframe.
  9. Economics

    4 Countries Pleading for Higher Commodity Prices

    Discover what countries are struggling the most from the price collapse in commodities and what these countries require to return to economic growth.
  10. Investing News

    Bank Stocks: Time to Buy or Avoid? (WFC, JPM, C)

    Bank stocks have been pounded. Is this the right time to buy or should they be avoided?
RELATED FAQS
  1. Which mutual funds made money in 2008?

    Out of the 2,800 mutual funds that Morningstar, Inc., the leading provider of independent investment research in North America, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do hedge funds invest in commodities?

    There are several hedge funds that invest in commodities. Many hedge funds have broad macroeconomic strategies and invest ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center