The U.S. Treasury Department is getting out of General Motors (NYSE:GM). The federal government announced December 19 that it plans to sell 500 million shares of GM, ending the over $50 billion bailout which began four years ago. GM is repurchasing 200 million of its shares by the end of this year at $27.50 per share. The Treasury Department will then unload the remaining 300 million over the next 12 to 15 months. By the middle of 2014, the federal government will have completely washed its hands of GM. Despite losing money on its investment, I'll look at why America wins in the long-run.

Guide To Oil And Gas Plays: We've got your comprehensive guide to oil and gas shales in North America.

The Ultimate Loss
GM is paying $5.5 billion for this current bunch of shares, leaving the government $21.6 billion in the red with 300 million shares left to sell. If the government gets the same price for these final shares, it reduces the amount outstanding by $8.3 billion leaving taxpayers short to the tune of $13.4 billion. However, I don't see the final number being quite that high unless GM lays an egg in the next couple of quarters or the S&P 500, which the Bank of Nova Scotia (NYSE:BNS) projects will gain 10% in 2013, doesn't. If neither of these comes to fruition, I could see GM delivering a similar performance to 2012, which is up approximately 33% through December 19. Based on an estimated 2012 closing price of $27.50 and a 33% appreciation in 2013, taxpayers could see a deficit of just $10.6 billion on its $51 billion bailout. However, if the economy even remotely recovers in Europe, it's possible that GM's stock could double next year. If so, the shortfall dwindles to $5.1 billion, a pittance for a government with an annual defense budget of $700 billion.

SEE: Top 6 U.S. Government Financial Bailouts

Mitt Was Wrong
The Center for Automotive Research estimates 1.4 million jobs were saved at GM, Chrysler and the rest of the auto industry as a result of the bailout. Some in the media portray the government's exit at a loss as some sort of major shame; it's entirely the wrong way of looking at the events of the past four years. The government invested $80 billion or $57,000 for every job saved. If the two firms were allowed to go bankrupt, I'll assume that the ultimate number of jobs lost would have been approximately 700,000 or half of those saved as a result of the bailout. However, those 700,000 jobs would likely be permanent. At an average annual salary of $40,000 (conservatively low), the economy would have lost approximately $28 billion in annual spending. It's not an insignificant number. Ford (NYSE:F) CEO Alan Mulally appeared on Fox News in September reminding investors that although it didn't take official bailout money (it did borrow $5.9 billion in 2009 for upgrading four facilities) the funds directed to the other two Detroit car companies were absolutely necessary to keep the auto industry, which contributes 12 to 15% of America's GDP, from imploding and taking out its supply chain. Again, I find it absolutely amazing that anyone can criticize the auto bailout when America has been bailing out defense contractors (grossly overpaying for weapons, etc.) for decades. Even if the ultimate loss on GM is $13.4 billion, it was money well spent. America makes cars and trucks. It's that simple.

GM's Road Ahead
GM CEO Dan Akerson recently sent an email to employees outlining the future of the company without the federal government tethered to its bumper. The biggest question mark Akerson wanted to put to rest was an American public that is suspicious of GMs ability to learn from its past mistakes. In the email, Akerson said, "Some of the lessons were financial, including how important it is to have a fortress balance sheet and a low break-even point . More than anything else, we are learning to be humble and to genuinely appreciate every customer." You can be critical of the bailout but I think it's fair to say that Akerson has proven his mettle since taking the helm Sept. 1, 2010. If nothing else, his open market purchase in May 2011 of 30,000 shares of GM stock at $31.33 per share (far more than Alan Mulally) indicates a commitment to the company that few of the other automotive CEOs can muster. This time next year I see Akerson's investment nicely in the black - just like GM itself.

SEE: How To Evaluate A Company's Balance Sheet

The Bottom Line
There are those that argue GM is on the precipice of another financial meltdown. I don't buy it for minute. However, isn't it nice that we're even having that debate. Four years ago it looked like the Ford-GM-Chrysler who's-better argument was ready to go up in smoke permanently. It still might but it won't be because the bailout failed. America won regardless of the ultimate financial loss.

At the time of writing, Will Ashworth did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center