Human resources consultant Towers Perrin Forster & Crosby merged with rival Watson Wyatt Worldwide back in January 2010. Economic uncertainty prompted the two firms to come together in an effort to reduce costs and compete more effectively with the likes of Mercer, a subsidiary of Aon Corporation (NYSE:AON), and Hewitt Associates, itself part of Marsh & McLennan (NYSE:MMC). Two years later, business looks great and so does its stock. (For more, see Earning Forecasts: A Primer.)

Investopedia Markets: Explore the best one-stop source for financial news, quotes and insights.

Financial Return

Terms of the merger gave Watson Wyatt shareholders 50% of Class A and Class B shares outstanding with Towers Perrin shareholders, and some designated employees getting the remaining 50% on a restricted basis, generally vesting over a three-year period. If my math is correct, two-thirds of those shares have vested with the remaining third vesting in January 2013. For instance, James Foreman, Managing Director of North, Central and South America, received 74,120 shares of Restricted Class A common shares. Half of which is already vested with the rest will be vested on Jan. 1, 2013. Sitting on unrealized gains of $1.1 million with more to come in 2013, shareholders and certain employees appear to have done very well. In a little more than 25 months, Foreman's achieved a 29.5% total return compared to 19.3% for the S&P 500. In my opinion, the best is yet to come.

Second Quarter

Towers Watson (NYSE:TW) announced strong second quarter earnings February 6. The highlight being the net operating income (NOI) margins of all three business segments. The benefits division, its largest, achieved net operating income of $162.3 million on $475.5 million revenue. That's a NOI margin of 34.1%, 360 basis points (BPS) higher year over year. Even more impressive is the 850 BPS improvement to 33% by its Talent and Rewards segment, nearly matching the NOI margins of its largest division. Sandwiched in between was the Risk and Financial Services segment, which delivered an NOI margin of 26.3%, 510 BPS higher than in the second quarter of 2010. The trio of improvements led to an overall NOI margin of 32%, a 480 BPS improvement. The merger was about reducing costs and improving its ability to compete. Bottom- and top-line improvements, in both its three-month and six-month numbers, is a clear indication the merger is working and the integration is not yet complete.

Employee Satisfaction

At a time when companies like Caterpillar (NYSE:CAT) are making record profits and still managing to toss workers out on the street for not accepting 50% pay cuts, it's gratifying to know that Towers Watson takes a far more egalitarian view of employee compensation. Happy employees make better employees. If you take a look deep in the 10-Q, you'll see that it increased base salaries in the first six months of fiscal 2012 by 4%. How many people can say they got a 4% pay increase in 2011? I doubt very many. On top of that, it paid out $185 million in bonuses, which is about 19% of its total spending for salaries and benefits. Having made these points, I'm not suggesting life is perfect at the benefit consultant. According to its 10-K, its employee savings plan has a 100% match on the first 2% of pay and a 50% match on the next 4% of pay. That's decent, but the company's contributions don't vest for two years. Caterpillar, on the other hand, matches 100% of the first 6% of pay and their contributions vest immediately. So, not all is bad at Big Yellow. However, given Towers Perrin pays out 19% of salaries and benefits for year-end bonuses, I can let the savings deficiency slide. On a 50,000 annual salary, a Towers Watson employee would receive a $3,000 annual matching contribution under the Caterpillar plan. Under the Towers Watson bonus plan, that same employee could conceivably receive as much as $9,000 and then another $2,000 for the savings plan. In the end, the Towers Watson employee is better off financially than most, and while money isn't everything, it certainly helps.

The Bottom Line

Although I haven't spent any time discussing Towers Watson's stock price or valuation metrics, it doesn't mean I haven't thought about those things. It's just that I don't think they'll matter if the company continues to execute on its post-merger plan for winning business. Furthermore, if it continues to look after its employees, its stock price will be higher in six months' time, six months after that and so on for some time to come. (For additional reading, check out 5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors.)

Use the Investopedia Stock Simulator to trade the stocks mentioned in this stock analysis, risk free!
At the time of writing, Will Ashworth did not own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Will J.C. Penney Come Back in 2016? (JCP)

    J.C. Penney is without a doubt turning itself around, but that doesn't guarantee the stock will respond immediately.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  3. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  4. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  5. Economics

    Is Wall Street Living in Denial?

    Will remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
  6. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  7. Investing News

    How AT&T Evolved into a Mobile Phone Giant

    A third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Yelp: Can it Regain its Losses in 2016? (YELP)

    Yelp investors have had reason to be happy recently. Will the good spirits last?
  10. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center