Walmart (NYSE:WMT) and a group of other national retailers met with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) earlier this year to discuss a new required disclosure of sources for conflict minerals used in their private label goods. The companies are arguing that they should not have to comply because they are not directly involved in the manufacturing process.

"Conflict minerals" is the term used for four minerals found in a wide variety of consumer goods: gold, tantalum, tin and tungsten. These minerals are used in the manufacture of cell phones, DVD players, lightbulbs and even airplanes. Some of these minerals come from Central Africa and other areas that have been ravaged by war and insurgency.

The United Nations reports that Congolese rebel groups, backed by Rwandan military, are making tens of millions of dollars a year by controlling the sale of these minerals, allowing the continuation of a war that has so far displaced or killed millions of people.

Regulation Against Conflict Minerals
In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Act ("Dodd-Frank") became law. The congressional legislation focused mainly on changing banking and investment firm practices, but contained a clause that requires that all American manufacturers trace their sources of conflict minerals and publicly report them. All manufacturers must comply by 2014, but some will have to report on their 2011 production in 2012.

The confusion that Walmart and other retailers want to clear up is whether they meet the definition of a "manufacturer" on store label products that they commission. For example, Walmart produces several lines of consumer ware under various Walmart labels, such as George, Mainstays and Great Value. The company contracts with manufacturers to produce and package the product using the Walmart branding. Walmart's argument to the SEC is that they do not have any direct control over the manufacturing process in these cases and therefore, should fall outside of the law.

Challenges
The difficulty that all manufacturers face with the new law is two-fold. First, it may be challenging to define the ultimate source of these minerals, as some come through "middle men" who may not identify their source. The second issue is that if the companies do use conflict minerals, they can still sell their products, but must label these products as their own. That is tantamount to the companies admitting that they are supporting the continuing war in the Congo, which could result in a marketing disaster.

Industry groups are also concerned about the application of the Dodd-Frank legislation. Manufacturers may find it easier to proactively source these minerals from other countries, rather than do the due diligence it takes to ensure that their African sources are conflict-free. Mining is the sole economic activity and source of income in many areas in Central Africa and losing mining contracts can have a disastrous impact on subsistence in the region.

On August 22, the SEC voted to approve the final law. The commission also included clearer and more detailed language as to when retailers are considered manufacturers. It specified that simply putting one's brand label on a product manufactured by another company does not qualify, but if the retailer has any input into the process, they step into the role of manufacturer. The SEC also pushed back full implementation to May 2014 to give companies more time to sort out how they will be able to comply.

The Bottom Line
Walmart and other large retailers are fighting against being labeled as manufacturers in order to avoid certain regulations of the Dodd-Frank legislation. The SEC has clarified Walmart's responsibility under the law. The accounting firm, KPMG, estimates that the law will apply to approximately half of all American publicly traded companies when it is fully implemented.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  3. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  5. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  6. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  9. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  10. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center