Energy sector investors have learned to expect that a handful of stocks never get that cheap, and specialized service provider Core Laboratories (NYSE:CLB) is definitely one of them. Unlike many energy service companies, Core Labs has a surprisingly consistent record of not only positive free cash flow, but free cash flow growth coupled with double-digit returns on invested capital. While rivals such as Schlumberger (NYSE:SLB) are trying to capture some of Core Labs' business, its strong competitive position seems very much intact. The real question for investors is whether they can get comfortable paying nearly twice the normal premium for a services company.

Discount Brokers Comparison: Your one-stop shop for finding the perfect broker for your investments.

OK Third Quarter Results in a Tough Climate
When Core Labs reported earnings back in mid-October, they were something of a mixed bag. The company did pretty well relative to expectation and it was definitely solid in comparison to other service providers such as Schlumberger, Halliburton (NYSE:HAL) and Baker Hughes (NYSE:BHI), but it was still soft in absolute terms.

Revenue rose 6% from the year-ago quarter and fell about 1% sequentially on normal seasonality. Reservoir description revenue fell 2% sequentially (but rose 4% annually) on seasonal weakness tied to Canadian oil sands. Production enhancement saw 4% annual growth and flat sequential performance despite a 6% sequential decline in rig counts. Lastly, the small reservoir management business saw 45% growth from last year, but a 3% pullback from the second quarter.

Not surprisingly for this company, profitability was quite respectable. Gross margin improved more than a point from last year and was steady on a sequential basis. Operating income jumped almost 19% from last year and rose about 5% sequentially on a reported basis. If you strip out some items, however (insurance settlement, retention awards and so on), the year on year improvement shrinks to 6%, while the sequential comparison reverses to a 3% decline.

SEE: Understanding The Income Statement

A When, Not if, Business?
It's not hard to see why investors bid up these shares and how/why the company is able to produce such solid financial returns in what is normally an extremely cyclical business. Companies that use Core Labs' offerings can improve their recovery levels from a range of 30-40% to 45% or more, and while a 5% improvement may not sound like much, it amounts to quite a lot when you're talking about millions of recoverable barrels of oil and huge incremental margins on that "extra" oil.

Consequently, I have a hard time imagining that clients such as Total (NYSE:TOT) or BP (NYSE:BP) are not going to continue to use Core Labs for reservoir description and/or production enhancement. Likewise, I think investors should be aware of the substantial overseas potential. While about half of the company's revenue comes from the United States today, I believe that will shrink in the next decade - not because U.S. oil production is going to decline, but rather because the drilling and service intensity in non-U.S. fields is so much lower than in the U.S.

Competition Coming ... As Always
I don't want to give the idea that Core Labs has an open runway to easy money. Companies such as Schlumberger, Halliburton and Baker Hughes already compete extensively in production enhancement. While competition is a little different in reservoir description (many oil/gas companies try to handle this internally if possible), Schlumberger and Weatherford (NYSE:WFT) are both trying to step up their game here, and Schlumberger's considerable technology and R&D capabilities make it dangerous to underestimate them. On the other hand, Core Labs has a large base of experienced scientists and has generally seen very low turnover.

The Bottom Line
It's hard not to like the persistence of growth in Core Labs' business; it's one of the few energy service companies where a discounted cash flow model doesn't seem fatuous. On the other hand, it's not like this stock is ever all that cheap; so much so, in fact, that I don't follow it closely on a quarter-to-quarter basis, as it often seems pointless to hope it'll get cheap enough to buy.

SEE: 5 Must-Have Metrics For Value Investors

All of that said, the shares are down about 11% over the past year, and this is perhaps as close to "cheap" as the stock is likely to get - provided you don't believe that energy demand is going to fall significantly and/or rivals like Schlumberger are going to step up and start grabbing share. At 15 times next year's EBITDA (nearly double the normal energy services multiple, but about average for Core Labs), these shares would seem to be worth close to $110. That certainly doesn't make it the cheapest energy services name, but given its historical performance, it may just be enough of a discount for some investors.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson owned shares of Weatherford since September 2012.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Allstate: How Being Boring Earns it Billions (ALL)

    A summary of what Allstate Insurance sells and whom it sells it to including recent mergers and acquisitions that have helped boost its bottom line.
  2. Options & Futures

    Cyclical Versus Non-Cyclical Stocks

    Investing during an economic downturn simply means changing your focus. Discover the benefits of defensive stocks.
  3. Investing Basics

    How to Deduct Your Stock Losses

    Held onto a stock for too long? Selling at a loss is never ideal, but it is possible to minimize the damage. Here's how.
  4. Economics

    Is Wall Street Living in Denial?

    Will remaining calm and staying long present significant risks to your investment health?
  5. Stock Analysis

    When Will Dick's Sporting Goods Bounce Back? (DKS)

    Is DKS a bargain here?
  6. Investing News

    How AT&T Evolved into a Mobile Phone Giant

    A third of Americans use an AT&T mobile phone. How did it evolve from a state-sponsored monopoly, though antitrust and a technological revolution?
  7. Stock Analysis

    Home Depot: Can its Shares Continue Climbing?

    Home Depot has outperformed the market by a wide margin in the last 12 months. Is this sustainable?
  8. Stock Analysis

    Yelp: Can it Regain its Losses in 2016? (YELP)

    Yelp investors have had reason to be happy recently. Will the good spirits last?
  9. Stock Analysis

    Is Walmart's Rally Sustainable? (WMT)

    Walmart is enjoying a short-term rally. Is it sustainable? Is Amazon still a better bet?
  10. Stock Analysis

    GoPro's Stock: Can it Fall Much Further? (GPRO)

    As a company that primarily sells discretionary products, GoPro and its potential falls right in line with consumer trends. Is that good or bad?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center