It has been a rough few years for deepwater drilling specialist Transocean (NYSE:RIG). In addition to a recent cyclical downturn in offshore drilling, the company seemed to fall behind a bit with its fleet and started losing business because of unexpected downtime issues. Worst of all, however, was the terrible BP (NYSE:BP) Deepwater Horizon/Macondo rig accident and the substantial financial liabilities that the company incurred for its role in the accident.
Now, however, things seem to be turning around. The company has taken steps to improve its fleet and rates are back on the way up. Most importantly, at least in the near term, Transocean has reached a very favorable settlement with the Department of Justice for its Macondo liabilities, suggesting that the company is close to having this matter behind it.
Guide To Oil And Gas Plays: We've got your comprehensive guide to oil and gas shales in North America.
A Favorable Settlement with the DOJ
Transocean announced on Thursday that it had reached an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice concerning its financial liabilities in the Macondo accident. In exchange for pleading guilty to one misdemeanor violation of the Clean Water Act and paying $1.4 billion in fines, penalties and recoveries, the DOJ will consider the matter closed.
As a technical matter, $1 billion of the $1.4 billion will go toward civil penalties under the Clean Water Act. Moreover, the company will have five years to pay this amount, with most due in the earlier part of that period. With $6 billion in cash on hand (though a net debt position of nearly $8 billion), Transocean should have no trouble paying this amount.
This represents a pretty sizable win. While the theoretical penalties under the CWA could have gone over $17 billion, nobody expected that. Instead, Street expectations were in the neighborhood of $2 billion to $3 billion. Given that the company had accrued $1.5 billion for this settlement, I find it interesting that the actual settlement came in even below that low amount.
SEE: Protect Your Company From Employee Lawsuits
But It's not over Yet ...
This doesn't end all of Transocean's obligations. First, there is still a comment and approval process to go through with this DOJ settlement, though it seems unlikely to be derailed. After this, the company still has outstanding issues with the Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) and Plaintiffs' Steering Committee (PSC).
It seems unlikely that the amounts tied to settling with the NRDA are going to be large. A district court has already ruled that Transocean is not liable for subsurface discharge, so Transocean's liability is tied to the spill of diesel from the rig's fuel tanks.
Resolving matters with the PSC is likely to be more challenging. The PSC proposed a settlement amount of over $1.5 billion, which Transocean apparently rejected out of hand. Given that the PSC has yet to win a court judgment proving gross negligence, they will likely have to settle for a less ambitious amount (or take their chances in court). It's worth noting that the company has about $450 million accrued/reserved to handle these outstanding NRDA and PSC claims.
Investors should also realize that further wrangling between Transocean and its insurance companies could develop. Insurance policies often have exclusions in cases where policyholders acknowledge criminal fault, so I'm not sure if Transocean's plea in the DOJ settlement has any bearing on the insurance recoveries it can expect.
SEE: The Importance Of Corporate Transparency
Back to Business ... and Business Is Getting Better
With most of the Macondo liabilities now fenced in, Transocean can go back to being more about its prospects in deepwater drilling. Fortunately, the company's prospects are looking pretty good. About 20% of its fleet comes up for renewal this year, and Transocean, Ensco (NYSE:ESV), SeaDrill (NYSE:SDRL) and Noble (NYSE:NE) have been seeing improving dayrates. Almost as important, it looks like Transocean has adjusted its fleet and moved past its outsized downtime issues.
The Bottom Line
Transocean seems about 30% undervalued on the basis of historical EV/EBITDA multiples, and I don't see any reason why the stock should trade at such a large discount. It's also worth noting that the first four or five months of the year are typically good months for energy service stocks. So Transocean stock could be in the right place at the right time. While I continue to prefer equipment companies such as National Oilwell Varco (NYSE:NOV) for the long term, I have to admit that Transocean looks like at least an interesting potential trade today.
At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.
Mutual Funds & ETFsLearn about arbitrage funds and how this type of investment generates profits by taking advantage of price differentials between the cash and futures markets.
Investing NewsWill Ferrari's shares move fast off the line only to sputter later?
InvestingCommodity prices have been heading lower for more than four years, being the worst performing asset class of 2015 with more losses in cyclical commodities.
Stock AnalysisHere are five stocks that pay safe dividends and should be at least somewhat resilient to a bear market.
InvestingThe further you fall, the harder it is to climb back up. It’s a universal truth that is painfully apparent in the investing world.
InvestingWest Texas Intermediate oil futures have recently made pronounced movements. What do they bode for the world market?
Fundamental AnalysisOptions market trading data can provide important insights about the direction of stocks and the overall market. Here’s how to track it.
Stock AnalysisCan these two oil stocks buck the trend?
Investing NewsAlcoa plans to split into two companies. Is this a bullish catalyst for investors?
Stock AnalysisIf you want to buck the bear market trend by going long on consumer stocks, these three might be your best bets.
When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>