Demand apparently is so good for Beam's (NYSE:BEAM) Maker's Mark brand of bourbon that it's decided to lower the alcohol content by three percentage points, from 45% alcohol by volume (90 proof) to 42% (84 proof), in order to meet its customers' thirst for the product. Those who like their drinks strong are no doubt appalled by the company's decision. Shareholders, on the other hand, could be in for a windfall. What are the financial ramifications of this decision? Let's have a look.

Discount Brokers Comparison: Your one-stop shop for finding the perfect broker for your investments.

Why the Decision?
Maker's Mark is one of Beam's seven power brands. With the exception of Pinnacle vodka, Maker's Mark had the best comparable net sales growth in 2012 of its top brands. Last year, it raised prices on both its Maker's Mark and Jim Beam brands of bourbon. Like the age-old trick by chip companies and so many others in the consumer packaged goods industry, where they shrink the size of the bag while leaving prices the same, Beam has concluded that it can't raise prices any further, so it's doing the next best thing and watering down its product. In a letter to its best customers, Rob Samuels, chief operating officer, had this to say about the move:

"... demand for our bourbon is exceeding our ability to make it, which means we are running very low on supply ... after looking at all possible solutions, we've worked carefully to reduce the alcohol by volume (ABV) by just 3%. This will enable us to maintain the same taste profile and increase our limited supply so there is enough Maker's Mark to go around, while we continue to expand the distillery to increase our production capacity."

SEE: New Year Planning For Business Owners

Clearly, Beam wants to spin this as an effort to meet customer demand and not one of margin expansion. However, if it were really committed to meeting customers' needs, a reduction in the size of the bottle from 750 to 700 milliliters (the standard in Britain) would possibly achieve the same result.

Most people don't realize that whiskey is distilled at levels of alcohol much higher than the proof it's ultimately sold at in order to deliver consistency across various batches. For example, one batch of Maker's Mark might come out of its distillation process at 70% alcohol by volume and then 75% the next. To achieve 45% alcohol by volume (soon to be 42%) each and every time, it adds water to the bottle. So, now that the company has decided to lower the alcohol content by three percentage points, it's effectively reducing the alcohol content prior to bottling by anywhere from 35 to 44 percentage points. Therefore, the cost to reduce the alcohol content is the extra water required for thinning; it's minimal at worst.

Financial Ramifications
Unless consumers boycott the new "Maker's Mark," which is hard to imagine, given that plenty of bourbons are sold at 40% alcohol by volume, the cost to the company will be negligible. In fact, using a quick home distilling calculator, I've determined that a 750 ml bottle of Maker's Mark under the new alcohol content will require an additional 12.75 ml of water and 12.75 ml less ethyl alcohol. Working backward, the reduction in alcohol would generate an additional 416,398 bottles, or 46,266 cases, and approximately $2.4 million in additional revenue.

The more interesting question is what would happen if the company kept the ABV the same but shrank the bottle by 50 milliliters, as suggested earlier. A quick calculation yields an additional 80,000 cases (8,400 ml vs. 9,000 ml) by going this route and approximately $9.6 million in revenue. While neither figure is insignificant, it's a drop in the bucket for a company whose 2012 revenue was $2.5 billion.

SEE: Beeronomics: Factors Affecting Your Pint

The Bottom Line
I must admit that I'm completely perplexed by Beam's decision, given the economics of it. There's not much to gain in terms of increased case production by using either method. This is nothing other than a move to generate greater profits from each bottle of Maker's Mark sold in the future. If I'm Diageo (NYSE:DEO) or Brown-Forman (NYSE:BF.B), this probably comes as no surprise. If you're a shareholder, the good from this move probably will outweigh the bad.

At the time of writing, Will Ashworth did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center