By and large, it's good to have industry-low cash production costs in a commodity industry, but even high-cost producers can do well when prices shoot up. That's exactly what investors in Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE:CLF) need to hope for in 2013, as this high-cost North American iron ore producer just doesn't look very compelling absent a big improvement in margins per ton.

Guide To Oil And Gas Plays: We've got your comprehensive guide to oil and gas shales in North America.

A Tough Close to the Year
Cliffs Natural Resources didn't end the year on a particularly strong note. Revenue fell 8% from the year-ago quarter and about 1% from the third quarter, largely due to lower prices for iron ore. Pricing and volumes were mixed across the company's segments. U.S. iron ore (USIO) volumes dropped 20% and pricing fell about 7%, while Canadian (ECIO) volumes increased 20% (but were about one-third those of USIO) and pricing fell 19%. In the Asia Pacific operations (APIO), volume shot up 56% but pricing dropped almost one-quarter, while North American coal operations saw a big increase in volume (up 94%) and pricing fell about 12%.

While revenue performance wasn't bad, the company saw gross profit decline about 50% on stubbornly higher costs. Even so, cash production costs weren't so horrible - falling 3% in USIO, falling 5% in APIO and less than 1% in the coal ops, while ECIO costs shot up 14% and were almost 16% higher than the per-ton sales price. Overall, EBITDA fell 58% from last year and came in almost one-quarter lower than analysts had expected.

SEE: A Clear Look At EBITDA

The Cost Problem Just Isn't Going Away
I don't want to harp on Cliffs' high production cost, but I think it's a key detail for prospective investors to understand. Iron ore prices are what they are. Cliffs gets a modest premium for the high quality of its Canadian iron ore, but it also has to accept a somewhat convoluted formula for its U.S.-produced iron ore (which largely is restricted by cost from the seaborne market).

Overall, Cliffs' costs run more than $60 per metric ton (with the costs in the Canadian operations much higher this quarter). While that's not terrible relative to a global average that is also in the $60s, it is not at all competitive with the world's largest producers - Rio Tinto (NYSE:RIO), Vale (NYSE:VALE) and BHP Billiton (NYSE:BHP) - whose costs run in the range of the low $30s to mid $40s per ton.

That cost disadvantage makes it considerably harder for Cliffs to do well when iron ore prices are weaker, and it makes the company highly dependent on higher prices. Unfortunately, with a lot of new iron ore capacity coming on-line this year, the prospects for a big upswing in iron ore prices are looking worse.

Shoring up the Balance Sheet
Management isn't sitting around waiting for things to get worse. The company announced a sizable dividend cut (from 62.5 cents per share per quarter to 15 cents), and also announced that it would be raising equity capital through two offerings that could bring in close to $900 million in new capital. Obviously, this capital raise will be dilutive to shareholders, but the company needs capital if it's going to continue expanding its operations.

Speaking of the expansion plans, it looks like the plans to double production from Bloom Lake are on hold until 2014. Given the costs of expansion and the generally mediocre outlook for ore prices, that may not be such a bad move.

SEE: Evaluating A Company's Management

The Bottom Line
It's hard for me to be positive on Cliffs Natural Resources. In particular, I believe the company has structural cost issues that just won't get substantially better. For instance, I think the company would normally consider shutting the high-cost ($166/ton) Wabush mine in Canada. However, doing so could create complications with permitting to expand Bloom Lake, so the company likely just has to swallow the higher costs at Wabush to reap the potential benefits from the high-quality Bloom Lake mine.

That said, nobody really knows where iron ore prices will go in 2013. If prices shoot up again, Cliffs Natural Resources will definitely benefit. I'm not terribly interested in commodity producers that are so highly leveraged to price, though, and I think these shares are quite expensive relative to Vale, BHP Billiton or Rio Tinto.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Fundamental Analysis

    4 Predictions for Oil in 2016

    Learn four predictions for oil markets in 2016 including where prices are heading and the key fundamental factors driving the market.
  3. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  5. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  6. Economics

    Will Silver Recover in 2016? (SLV, GLD, JJC)

    The end of the silver downtrend is likely to coincide with similar recoveries in gold, iron and copper.
  7. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Silver Penny Stocks for 2016 (LODE,AG)

    Learn about five of the top silver penny stocks and why investors may want to consider adding them to their investment portfolios in 2016.
  8. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center