Acquisitions can obviously expand a company's operations, but even growth-by-acquisition stories ultimately come down to a company's ability to execute. Helen Of Troy (Nasdaq:HELE) has always been a willing (and aggressive) acquirer, and that has allowed management to build the company into a diversified collection of well-known home and personal care brands. The question now, however, is whether this company can take advantage of the rampant restructurings among its larger rivals to widen its niche and gain market share.

Top Investment Trends For 2013: We go over a few investment trends for you to think about for 2013.

So-So Performance in Fiscal Third Quarter
While Helen of Troy's management bragged about the company's record revenue and profits in the fiscal third quarter, discerning investors knew to look through the hype and hyperbole. To that end, Helen of Troy showed some progress this quarter, but there's still much left for management to do (or do better).

Revenue was up nearly 11% as reported, but a large chunk of that growth was bought and paid for by the company; organic revenue growth was only about 2%. While that 2% growth is an improvement (Q2 sales were down 6% organically), I'm a little disappointed by the sluggish performance in personal care.

Margins were a mixed bag as well. While gross margin did improve a bit (about 30 basis points) from last year, it was down more than a point sequentially. On the other hand, operating income rose more than 12%, and the company did see nearly two points of sequential operating margin improvement.

Why Can't Helen of Troy Grab More Business?
I'm a little frustrated by the results that the company delivered this quarter. The performance in housewares (up 11%) was very solid, and the company has brands such as OXO running smoothly, so there are no real worries there.

The other two business segments are a different matter. The personal care business saw revenue down slightly, and while the company blamed the consumer retail environment (in part) for this decline, I have some trouble with that. First of all, Helen of Troy's products are, by and large, competitively priced relative to many of the offerings of Unilever (NYSE:UL), Newell Rubbermaid (NYSE:NWL), Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) and Church & Dwight (NYSE:CHD), so I don't see why the company shouldn't see some benefit. What's more, many companies in this sector (like P&G) are retrenching and losing share in the Nielsen data, and I'm concerned that Helen of Troy isn't exploiting that.

Likewise in the health care/home segment. While reported revenue was up 23% on the PUR deal, underlying revenue was up less than 1%. In its 10-Q, the company blamed some of the same overall retail factors, but it also mentioned "loss of shelf placement on certain key products due to competitive pricing pressures." I wonder if that refers to Clorox (NYSE:CLX) (in the water filtration business) or one of the competitors to the Honeywell-branded home/health products, or something else entirely. In any case, aggressive price competition is one thing that Helen of Troy is not especially well-structured to surmount, so this is worth watching.

The Bottom Line
Although this summary has been pretty negative, I'm actually a fan of Helen of Troy on balance. While the company's heavy exposure to China is a risk to its cost of goods, I like that the company has moved aggressively to acquire well-known brands. Integration of its recent large deals should lead to better margins in coming years. That said, the recent trend in organic revenue is reason to pause regarding the company's ability to deliver differentiated growth from its broader end markets.

I continue to believe that Helen of Troy can deliver free cash flow growth in the high single-digits over the long term. At present, however, the Street is already in tune with that potential, and the current mid-$30 range stock price doesn't leave abundant upside to what I see as a fair value in the high $30 range. This is a good stock to include on a watch list, but I'd be in no great hurry to buy today unless you have a strong conviction that the company will drive significantly better organic revenue growth in the next few quarters.

At the time of writing, Stephen D. Simpson did not own shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center