Big news came out of the diamond business Jan. 14 as Harry Winston Diamond Corp. (NYSE:HWD) announced it was selling its jewelry and watch brand to Swatch Group AG (OTC:SWGAY) for $750 million plus the assumption of $250 million in debt. Rumors first surfaced back in October that the diamond miner was looking to sell the brand to focus on mining. Now that it's done so, the deal appears to be a good fit for both parties. I'll explain why.

The Seller
Harry Winston was once known as Aber Diamond and traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange. In May 2004, it acquired 51% of the jewelry and watch brand from Fenway Partners for $85 million. Up until that point its only asset was 40% ownership in the Diavik diamond mine in Canada's northern territories in partnership with Rio Tinto (NYSE:RIO), which owns the remaining 60%. Over the next 17 months, Aber acquired the remaining 49% interest in Fenway for approximately $162 million, putting the total cost to acquire the brand at $247 million.

By that point Aber was more than a diamond company, so it changed its name in November 2007 to Harry Winston Diamond Corp. and listed itself on the New York Stock Exchange. Selling the brand for $750 million, it's achieved a 13.4% annualized return on its investment over a period of slightly less than nine years. That's far better than its stock, which has lost 48% of its value during the same period.

SEE: Diamonds: The Missing Commodity Derivative

The Buyer
Although Swatch is paying top dollar for the luxury brand, it gains entry into the world of jewelry, which accounts for approximately 75% of Harry Winston's annual revenue. It rightfully feels it can boost the operating margins of the luxury brand segment, which haven't kept pace with the mining segment.

Furthermore, Swatch would like nothing better than to walk all over Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF) after the two parted company in September 2011 on less than friendly terms. CEO Nick Hayek has done a good job guiding the Swiss company since taking over from his dad in 2003. With this acquisition, Swatch will be able to compete with the likes of Tiffany, Cartier and Bulgari in the luxury jewelry business.

Make no mistake, with $2.2 billion in cash, this is an easily digestible purchase that definitely fills a big hole in its lineup. Chairwoman Nayla Hayek commented that it "brilliantly complements the prestige segment" of Swatch.

SEE: Have Jewelry Stocks Lost Their Luster?

Mining Only
The question for Harry Winston shareholders is what the company will look like now that it's out of the luxury game. After the deal closes, it will change its name to the Dominion Diamond Co. and focus solely on its existing diamond operation as well as securing additional diamond investments. The $750 million in cash will help it acquire BHP Billiton Limited's (NYSE:BHP) interest in the Ekati diamond mine in the Northwest Territories (offered $500 million), which it announced last November.

In its press release announcing the deal with Swatch, Harry Winston CEO Robert Gannicott had this to say: "At the time that we purchased the Harry Winston brand, resource investment opportunities for diamonds were rare and expensive ... Today there is a range of diamond resource opportunities while the value of heritage luxury brands has increased dramatically. This transaction represents a sound return on our original investment."

He's right about that. The Swatch buyout places an enterprise value of 23 times EBITDA on Harry Winston's luxury brand, compared with 21 times what LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SA (OTC:LVMUY) paid for Bulgari in 2011. It's getting a great price.

In 2012 through Oct. 31, Harry Winston's mining segment generated revenues of $235.3 million, a 25% increase year-over-year. Its operating profit through the first three quarters was $37.3 million, 75% higher than in 2011. My estimate for full-year 2013 revenues for the mining segment is $363 million and an operating profit of $62 million.

Harry Winston estimates the present net value of the Ekati mine to be C$2.6 billion over 10 years. Therefore, its pro forma 2013 revenues with Ekati (not a done deal due to minority interests) could be as high as $623 million with operating profits of $106 million.

Given the luxury brand accounted for 69% of the company's debt at the end of third quarter, excluding the Ekati deal, Dominion Diamond will have $104 million in long-term debt after the luxury brand is sold to Swatch. Assuming this deal and the Ekati deal both go through, the remaining mining segment should have very little debt and significantly more revenue and profits.

SEE: Diamonds Are No Longer BHP's Best Friend

The Bottom Line
This is a great deal for both companies. Harry Winston, or should I say Dominion Diamond, wasn't generating enough profit from the luxury brand because the vertical integration imagined when it made the deal back in 2004 just wasn't there. It will do what it does best, and that's mine and market rough diamonds. Apparently, Rio Tinto's 60% stake in the Diavik mine is available.

Swatch, on the other hand, has 19 watch brands from basic all the way up to prestige, and is the world's biggest watchmaker. It gets to grow another luxury brand while truly competing with the big boys in fancy jewelry.

Everybody wins.

At the time of writing, Will Ashworth did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
  9. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    3 Vanguard Equity Fund Underperformers

    Discover three funds from Vanguard Group that consistently underperform their indexes. Learn how consistent most Vanguard low-fee funds are at matching their indexes.
  10. Investing News

    Alphabet Earnings Beat Expectations (GOOGL, AAPL)

    Alphabet's earnings crush analysts' expectations; now bigger than Apple?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
Trading Center