With prices for natural gas, coal and a few other traditional fossil fuel sources trading at low levels, it's been tough going for the alternative energy sector over the last few years. Solar in particular has been hit hard as a wave of subsidy and tariff cuts have become commonplace across the developed world. Big solar nations such as Spain, Germany and Italy have been forced to cancel lucrative breaks for PV manufacturers as they grapple with austerity measures and ballooning public budgets.

Given the harsh trading environment, it's no surprise why many solar manufacturers have seen their share prices tumble and why the broad sector plunged to new lows. It's also not surprising that many solar-based firms - such as BrightSource Energy - that planned to go public in 2012 shelved their initial public offerings (IPOs).

One firm, however, decided to brave the IPO market and paid the price in how much money it raised. SolarCity (Nasdaq:SCTY) went through with its plans, only after reducing its initial share price. The real question is, why did SolarCity reduce that IPO price instead of waiting until the market was in a better position to go public?

Down to $8
Unlike many of the stocks in the solar sector, SolarCity doesn't actually manufacture panels, but installs residential and small commercial PV systems. The key to the firm's pending success was its business model that allows customers to lease solar panels by paying a monthly fee in order to avoid the high costs of an outright array purchase. Solar arrays can cost thousands of dollars and take years to recoup their initial investments. That model was supposed to give the firm an edge in the IPO market. However, things didn't quite turn out as planned.

The San Mateo, California-based company originally planned to sell 10.1 million shares between $13 and $15 per share, which would have given it a market cap near $1 billion. However, after underwriters postponed the IPO, SolarCity amended its prospectus to sell 11.5 million shares at $8 a pop. Overall, the solar installer managed to raise $91 million after fees.

The IPO had been widely watched by cleantech and venture capitalists - especially since it was backed by Elon Musk, co-founder of Tesla Motors (Nasdaq:TSLA). So what went wrong?

Terrible Timing
First, the timing of SolarCity's IPO couldn't have been worse. Companies seeking to harness energy from the sun have struggled in recent years as American firms face stiff competition from China. "Dumping" allegations and Chinese subsidies have created a glut of panels currently on the market and have driven down prices to historic lows.

Add dwindling feed-in tariffs and government subsidies to the mix and many in the global solar industry have cut back production, laid off workers or declared bankruptcy - i.e., Solyndra. Even though it has a completely different business model, SolarCity faced the "solar panel stigma." That hurt its chances for an IPO success.

Secondly, the originally IPO price was set at a premium to other solar firms currently on the market. Institutional investors weren't willing to pay that premium for a somewhat untested firm - especially since some industry stalwarts such as First Solar (Nasdaq:FSLR) were trading at new lows relative to their historic values.

Finally, many analysts worried that the firm would have a hard time bringing in enough customers considering that the housing sector and the economy are in the dumps. Paying a monthly fee for solar panels seems like a luxury when costs for almost everything else have gone up in the last few years. Achieving critical mass may be difficult for SolarCity, and the firm warranted a lower IPO price.

The Bottom Line
While shares of SolarCity have risen quite nicely since their the debut - making IPO investors some decent coin - the fact that the company left money on the table certainly isn't a good sign for any other solar-related firm wanting to raise cash. The sector remains a difficult place to do business as long as subsides are absent and panels remain plentiful.

At the time of writing, Aaron Levitt did not own any shares in any company mentioned in this article.

Related Articles
  1. Investing News

    What You Can Learn from Carl Icahn's Mistakes

    Carl Icahn has been a stellar performer in the investment world for decades, but following his lead these days could be dangerous.
  2. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  3. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  4. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  5. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  6. Stock Analysis

    The Top 5 Micro Cap Alternative Energy Stocks for 2016 (AMSC, SLTD)

    Follow a cautious approach when purchasing micro-cap stocks in the alternative energy sector. Learn about five alternative energy micro-caps worth considering.
  7. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  8. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  10. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center