Consumer electronics giants Apple and Samsung have stolen the tech-sector headlines as the two behemoths have been waging a multi-billion dollar war over patents.Apple is demanding that Samsung pay up$2.5 billion for allegedly stealing the design technology for its smartphones at tables from the iPad and iPhone; on the other hand, Samsung is pointing the finger at Apple and demanding $399 million for stealing its technology. Scott Freeze, President of Street One Financial, recently took time out of his schedule to discuss the implications of this patent trial and how the looming verdict may impact ETFs which maintain signficant exposure to these companies.

ETF Database (ETFdb):Without taking any sides on this case, what's your take on the Apple (AAPL)versus Samsung (SSNLF) patent battle?

Scott Freeze (SF):Apple has been suing Samsung all over the globe. The issue in this case is did Samsung steal the design technology of the iPad and iPhone. That seems like a pretty hard sell to me, especially since all smartphones and tablets are incredibly similar in look and feel. It seems that the Samsung products are better received than the Apple products now in certain segments, and Apple needs to find a way to stop Samsung from taking moremarket shareto maintain its dominance.

ETFdb:Do you foresee volatile trading in either of these companies as thejury deliberates over the next few days, and possibly weeks?

SF:I would expect both stocks to trade in-line with the broad market.

ETFdb:Which company do you think will suffer more if the verdict doesn't swing their way and why?

SF:I think the downside is much higher for Apple than Samsung. While the dollar award is small if Apple needs to pay Samsung, the real risk to Apple is that Samsung continues to grow their market share and bring out more competitors to the iPhone and iPad. Apple grew on the stregnth of innovation and being the first ones with revolutionary products; however, they recently haven't released new products, just slightlyimprovedversions of existing ones, while Samsung has released competing products that by many accounts are superior to the Apple products. If Apple loses this verdict, then Samsung can move full force on distributing their better and less expensive products.

ETFdb: Should investors be wary of entering into ETFs heavy in Apple/Samsungprior to the verdict? Why or why not?

SF:I would hesitate to jump into QQQ, XLK, IYW (ETFs where Apple is 20% of the underlying basket) just because of the downside risk to Apple and the heavily over-weighted nature of the stock in those ETFs. Funds likeEWY, AAIT, AIA where Samsung is the largest holding probably won't see as much of a downward move should Apple win, since Samsung has tremendous upside prospects and will likely appeal any loss verdict. Conversely, an Apple win is only a slightly market moving event, while a Samsung victory could push their stock up 3-4% .

ETFdb:Do you think the implications from this case could have a major impacton the long-term fundamentals for Apple or Samsung?

SF: The long-term fundamentals for both companies really aren't impacted by this case. It is more of a current market share issue, and win or lose, we feel that Samsung will continue to grow while we worry about Apple's future prospects due to increased competetion and a lack of new products.

ETFdb:Aside from this uncertainty in the technology sector, what are youseeing in the markets now? How are you positioning your clients generallyover the next 12 to 18 months?

SF:We think the markets are overpriced currently; the run-up this summer on no volume has been on the back of QE3 hopes, and we don't see that happening. 12-18 months is a lifetime in this market. We wholly expect that the EU issues will grow and that Spain will need a bailout and Greece will leave the EU in the next 18 months. There is really no positive result to U.S. fiscal policy no matter what happens, and we expect volatility to spike. As Europe enters a second recession and the U.S. barely stays out of one, we seecontinuedpositive earnings on decreased estimates and misses on revenue, with a market that falls 10-18% and then trades flat; as such, I prefer ETFs to single stocksthroughoutthis time frame.

Bottom Line:the Apple-Samsung patent battle likely won't alter the longer-term fundamentals for each company, although the immediate reaction to a definitive verdict could provide attractive ETF tradingopportunitiesfor seasoned veterans.

Follow me on Twitter@SBojinov

Disclosure: No positions at time of writing.

Related Articles
  1. Economics

    India: Why it Might Pay to Be Bullish Right Now

    Many investors are bullish on India for all the right reasons. Does it present an investing opportunity?
  2. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  3. Investing Basics

    Building My Portfolio with BlackRock ETFs and Mutual Funds (ITOT, IXUS)

    Find out how to construct the ideal investment portfolio utilizing BlackRock's tools, resources and its popular low-cost exchange-traded funds (ETFs).
  4. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  5. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  6. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  7. Investing

    3 Things About International Investing and Currency

    As world monetary policy continues to diverge rocking bottom on interest rates while the Fed raises them, expect currencies to continue their bumpy ride.
  8. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  9. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  10. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
RELATED FAQS
  1. Should mutual funds be subject to more regulation?

    Mutual funds, when compared to other types of pooled investments such as hedge funds, have very strict regulations. In fact, ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. Do ETFs pay capital gains?

    Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) can generate capital gains that are transferred to shareholders, typically once a year, triggering ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. How do real estate hedge funds work?

    A hedge fund is a type of investment vehicle and business structure that aggregates capital from multiple investors and invests ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. Are Vanguard ETFs commission-free?

    While some Vanguard exchange-traded funds (ETFs) are available commission-free from third-party brokers, a large portion ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. Do Vanguard ETFs require a minimum investment?

    Vanguard completely waives any U.S. dollar minimum amounts to buy its exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and the minimum ETF investment ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. Can mutual fund expense ratios be negative?

    Mutual fund expense ratios cannot be negative. An expense ratio is the sum total of all fees charged by an asset management ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center