It's tough to imagine that anything could unseat Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) as the king of all-things-Internet.
After all, not only does the company dominate the search engine market, but it also keeps people in the Google circle by constantly adding new tools and features to its repertoire. The Google Docs office software suite, online picture-filing-cabinet Picasa and its mapping software are three of the free services Google has provided to users in an effort to pull them deeper into the fold.

As is so often the case, however, time and success appear to have finally caught up with Google, and the features that made it great in the early part of its existence aren't keeping up with the competition anymore. Ironically, the very competition Google was whipping just a few years ago is catching up -- with a vengeance -- on three specific fronts.

1. Google is losing key executives

The loss of one key executive to a competitor is annoying, but when two top executives defect to direct competition, then it's a headache. When the number reaches three, there's an obvious pattern setting up.

Google's highest-profile loss in recent memory is the exit of Marissa Mayer. She spent 13 years with Google and served as vice president of local, maps and location services before she was named as the new CEO of Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO) in July.

Though the raw proprietary technology Mayer helped design at Google will be staying with her old employer, her knowledge and experience will give Yahoo! some amazing insight on how to compete successfully in the next evolution of Web usage. Mayer has made no bones about the fact that Yahoo! is embracing the importance of mobile Web and local Web. Indeed, she's so intent on taking the company in that direction, she recruited a new chief operating officer with relevant experience. It's Henrique de Castro, who was acting as the president of global media, mobile and platforms for... you guessed it, Google.

And this is still not the entire list of strong leaders Google has lost.

The current CEO leading the surprising turnaround at AOL (NYSE: AOL) is Tim Armstrong, the former president of Google's Americas operation. Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) has also scooped up several key Google employees to fix some glaring problems with the new iPhone's maps application.

But the talent-bleed is only half of the problem festering for Google.

2. Google's strategies are being applied elsewhere

Google's amazing growth has been fueled by an almost formulaic approach to building its brand.

At its core, Google thrives on projects, or the development of incremental ideas or revamps -- sometimes through acquisitions -- that are perfected or punted within a set period of time. If a project works well and drives revenue, then it's kept. If it doesn't work well, then it's dropped and the team that was working on it moves on to other assignments. Either way, no Google employee has a chance to ever get in a professional rut (in a good way).

The problem with such an approach is that it's easy for other companies to adopt it and generate the same kind of success as Google has had with it. And sure enough, Mayer and Armstrong are using the same project-deployment techniques to rebuild Yahoo!'s and AOL's websites as destinations chockfull of useful tools and information.

As an example, Mayer is leading the charge to revamp the Yahoo! homepage, ultimately in an effort to increase the website's traffic. The so-called "Project Homerun" is clearly big. Once it's implemented and put into motion, traffic is likely to ramp up, but the team currently working on the project will have no need to keep working on the task. It will likely move on to other tasks.

Armstrong has also applied the one-time-overhaul approach. One of his more prolific projects is nicknamed "Project Devil," which is designed to improve the effectiveness of AOL's display ads.

In simplest terms, Google is no longer going to be the only Internet company to tout new features constantly.

3. Google is now a behemoth

It may be unfair, but the bigger a company gets, the tougher it is to keep it growing. Mathematically, the bigger a company gets, the less impressive its percentage-growth rate becomes -- even if, in absolute terms, growth remains strong. That's where Google may be right now. The easy money and easy market penetration are behind it, and now that its competition has started to catch up, Google's competitive edge is getting relatively dull.

Throw in the fact that its ad-revenue growth rate slowed during the third quarter while Facebook (Nasdaq: FB) made huge strides on the same front, and it isn't hard to wonder whether Google has already peaked.

Risks to Consider: When it comes to the Web, companies are just one app or service away from ruling the world or falling completely out of favor. Though unlikely, if for some reason Yahoo! whiffs on its effort to become a major mobile player, or Google somehow breaks into telecom-service space, then it could change the entire Web landscape in an instant.

Action to Take --> Just to be fair, Google is apt to remain the king of search for a long, long time. This doesn't mean its future growth will be as strong as its historical growth, however, now that AOL and Yahoo! are being led by some of the very same people that put Google on the map, using the very same project-management approach.

Between these two companies, Yahoo! may be the better stock pick just because it's starting with a much stronger presence in the marketplace. Given the third-quarter's solid income numbers, shares could be worth as much as 40% more within 12 months. The company beat estimates and reported earnings of 35 cents per shares in the third quarter, 10 cents more than analyst expectations, so it looks like Mayer is off to a great start. The forward-looking price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 14.3 is fair as it is, but if Yahoo! keeps beating analyst projections like that, then the forward P/E ratio could likely turn into a single-digit figure.

Meanwhile, Google has disappointed. The search engine giant actually missed earnings expectations of $10.65 per share for the third quarter, turning in a only $9.03 in per-share earnings. It was the second miss in a year.

Related Articles
  1. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    The 4 Best Buy-and-Hold ETFs

    Explore detailed analyses of the top buy-and-hold exchange traded funds, and learn about their characteristics, statistics and suitability.
  2. Stock Analysis

    The Biggest Oil Producers in Asia

    Learn which Asian countries deliver the most crude oil to market, and discover what companies are the biggest producers in each country.
  3. Stock Analysis

    The 5 Biggest Russian Oil Companies

    Discover the top Russian oil companies by production volume and find out more about their domestic and international business operations.
  4. Mutual Funds & ETFs

    What Exactly Are Arbitrage Mutual Funds?

    Learn about arbitrage funds and how this type of investment generates profits by taking advantage of price differentials between the cash and futures markets.
  5. Investing News

    Ferrari’s IPO: Ready to Roll or Poor Timing?

    Will Ferrari's shares move fast off the line only to sputter later?
  6. Stock Analysis

    5 Cheap Dividend Stocks for a Bear Market

    Here are five stocks that pay safe dividends and should be at least somewhat resilient to a bear market.
  7. Investing

    How to Win More by Losing Less in Today’s Markets

    The further you fall, the harder it is to climb back up. It’s a universal truth that is painfully apparent in the investing world.
  8. Fundamental Analysis

    Use Options Data To Predict Stock Market Direction

    Options market trading data can provide important insights about the direction of stocks and the overall market. Here’s how to track it.
  9. Stock Analysis

    2 Oil Stocks to Buy Right Now (PSX,TSO)

    Can these two oil stocks buck the trend?
  10. Investing News

    What Alcoa’s (AA) Breakup Means for Investors

    Alcoa plans to split into two companies. Is this a bullish catalyst for investors?
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>

You May Also Like

Trading Center
You are using adblocking software

Want access to all of Investopedia? Add us to your “whitelist”
so you'll never miss a feature!