Sometimes, the best stock-picking strategies are the simplest ones. The "Dogs of the Dow" theory is certainly simple enough, yet amazingly, this aging strategy still has some proven merit. What it is
The Dogs of the Dow theory is now 20 years old, though is still as relevant today as it was when Michael O'Higgins unveiled it in 1991.

His approach simply calls for investors to own the 10 highest-yielding stocks among the Dow Jones Industrial Average's 30 constituents, as they are historically the most likely to outperform the index as a group.

While in practice, this approach can be applied any time of the year. But the majority of the time, investors begin to wade into those 10 positions at the end of the year, and/or the beginning of a new year, with plans to hold those picks for the entire 12-month period. And given the calendar, now is the appropriate time to point out the Dow's 10 highest-yielding stocks. Take a look at the table below...



Potential Pitfalls
Before anyone rushes out to buy these high-yielding stocks solely based on someone's theory, a reality check may be in order for a couple of reasons.

First and foremost, the strategy implicitly assumes that all 30 of the Dow's constituents value income distribution over growth.

The reality is that some of the Dow's companies have established themselves as dividend-oriented stocks because that's what the market is demanding. McDonald's (NYSE: MCD), AT&T (NYSE: T), and DuPont De Nemours (NYSE: DD) are three heavily-traded stocks that come to mind because they produce income. To expect any of them to outpace the Dow's average return may be an unfair expectation.

A second reason the Dogs of the Dow strategy isn't bulletproof: Some of these stocks are on the Dogs of the Dow list because the only way they would have beaten the Dow would have been if they significantly pumped up their dividend rate.

If they had made forward progress in terms of price, then they'd be off the list. In fact, seven of 2012's "dogs" were on the list in 2010. Eight of 2013's Dogs of the Dow were on the list last year.

Numbers Don't Lie
Still, while the past couple of years may not have yielded much fruit for fans of the approach, over the long haul, there's something to it.

In the past 20 years, the Dogs of the Dow approach has produced an average annual return of 10.8%, versus an average annual return of only 9.6% for the S&P 500. That's not bad, but don't get too excited yet.

See, for the same 20 years, the Dow's average annual return was also 10.8%, meaning the theory did no better or worse than owning all 30 Dow stocks. However, for the past 10-year, five-year and three-year periods, the Dogs of the Dow approach has produced a better average return than the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Moreover -- and somewhat contrary to the notion that the dogs must work their way off the list for the strategy to work -- in 2010 and 2011, the Dogs of the Dow basket did manage to outperform the Dow even though most of those stocks had been on the list for several years. How? It was indeed a combination of rising dividends and a handful of Dogs that performed amazingly well.

Risks to Consider: Though the theory works more often than not, bear in mind that the Dogs of the Dow theory is deemed to be successful in any given year as long is it outperforms the benchmark. This means even if Dogs collectively lose ground in any given year, as long as it loses less than the Dow Jones Industrial Average, then it's still scored as a win for the approach. It's still a loss, however, for portfolios.

Action to Take --> While it may not make sense to fill out an entire portfolio with the Dogs of the Dow, it's an easy and effective way to place some key blue chips in your portfolio. And, although the upside of doing so hasn't been bulletproof, the idea still been a better than average one. Investors who used the Dogs of the Dow approach nearly doubled the Dow's overall return in 2011, and have topped the S&P 500's average annual return by more than one full percentage point over the course of the past 20 years. That may not be a huge difference, but those nickels and dimes add up over time.

Related Articles
  1. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Altria's Return on Equity (ROE) (MO)

    Learn about Altria Group's return on equity (ROE) and analyze net profit margin, asset turnover and financial leverage to determine what is causing its high ROE.
  2. Investing News

    Icahn's Bet on Cheniere Energy: Should You Follow?

    Investing legend Carl Icahn continues to lose money on Cheniere Energy, but he's increasing his stake. Should you follow his lead?
  3. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Google's Return on Equity (ROE) (GOOGL)

    Learn about Alphabet's return on equity. How has its ROE changed over time, how does it compare to its peers and what factors are driving ROE for the company?
  4. Investing News

    Is Buffett's Bet on Oil Right for You? (XOM, PSX)

    Oil stocks are getting trounced, but Warren Buffett still likes one of them. Should you follow the leader?
  5. Investing News

    Chipotle Served with Criminal Probe

    Chipotle's beat muted expectations and got a clear bill from the CDC, but it now appears that an investigation into its E.coli breakout has expanded.
  6. Stock Analysis

    Analyzing Sprint Corp's Return on Equity (ROE) (S)

    Learn about Sprint's return on equity. Find out why its ROE is negative and how asset turnover and financial leverage impact ROE relative to Sprint's peers.
  7. Stock Analysis

    Why Alphabet is the Best of the 'FANGs' for 2016

    Alphabet just impressed the street, but is it the best FANG stock?
  8. Budgeting

    Plated Review, Is It Worth It?

    Take a closer look at the ready-to-cook meal service, Plated, and learn how the company can help you take the hassle out of home cooking.
  9. Investing News

    How China's Economy is Now Like America's

    China's economy could take the global economy down with it; why that might be good news in the grand scheme.
  10. Investing News

    A 2016 Outlook: What January 2009 Can Teach Us

    January 2009 and January 2016 were similar from an investment standpoint, but from a forward-looking perspective, they were very different.
RELATED FAQS
  1. How do dividends affect retained earnings?

    When a company issues a cash dividend to its shareholders, the retained earnings listed on the balance sheet are reduced ... Read Full Answer >>
  2. What is the difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital?

    The difference between called-up share capital and paid-up share capital is investors have already paid in full for paid-up ... Read Full Answer >>
  3. Why would a corporation issue convertible bonds?

    A convertible bond represents a hybrid security that has bond and equity features; this type of bond allows the conversion ... Read Full Answer >>
  4. How does additional paid in capital affect retained earnings?

    Both additional paid-in capital and retained earnings are entries under the shareholders' equity section of a company's balance ... Read Full Answer >>
  5. What types of capital are not considered share capital?

    The money a business uses to fund operations or growth is called capital, and there are a number of capital sources available. ... Read Full Answer >>
  6. What is the difference between issued share capital and subscribed share capital?

    The difference between subscribed share capital and issued share capital is the former relates to the amount of stock for ... Read Full Answer >>
COMPANIES IN THIS ARTICLE
Trading Center