

Return, Risk And The Security Market Line  Building A SupplySide Model
Let's review the most popular approach, which is to build a supplyside model. There are three steps:
 Estimate the expected total return on stocks.
 Estimate the expected riskfree return (bond).
 Find the difference: expected return on stocks minus riskfree return equals the equity risk premium.
We'll keep it simple and sidestep a few technical issues. Specifically, we are looking at expected returns that are longterm, real, compound and pretax. By longterm, we mean something like 10 years, as short horizons raise questions of market timing. (That is, it is understood that markets will be over or undervalued in the short run.)
By "real," we mean net of inflation. Even if we estimated the stock and bond returns in nominal terms, inflation would fall out of the subtraction anyhow. And by "compound," we mean to ignore the ancient question of whether forecasted returns ought to be calculated as arithmetic or geometric (timeweighed) averages.
Finally, although it is convenient to refer to pretax returns (as virtually all academic studies do), individual investors should care about aftertax returns. Taxes make a difference. Let's say the riskfree rate is 3% and the expected equity premium is 4%; we therefore expect equity returns of 7%. Say we earn the riskfree rate entirely in bond coupons taxed at ordinary income tax rates of 35%, whereas equities may be deferred entirely into a capital gains rate of 15% (i.e., no dividends). The aftertax picture in this case makes equities look even better.
Step One: Estimate the Expected Total Return on Stocks
DividendBased Approach
The two leading supplyside approaches start with either dividends or earnings. The dividendbased approach says that returns are a function of dividends and their future growth. Consider an example with a single stock that today is priced at $100, pays a constant 3% dividend yield (dividend per share divided by stock price), but for which we also expect the dividend  in dollar terms  to grow at 5% per year.
In this example, you can see that if we grow the dividend at 5% per year and insist on a constant dividend yield, the stock price must go up 5% per year too. The key assumption is that the stock price is fixed as multiple of the dividend. If you like to think in terms of P/E ratios, it is the equivalent to assuming that 5% earnings growth and a fixed P/E multiple must push the stock price up 5% per year. At the end of five years, our 3% dividend yield naturally gives us a 3% return ($19.14 if the dividends are reinvested). And the growth in dividends has pushed the stock price to $127.63, which gives us an additional 5% return. Together, we get a total return of 8%.
That's the idea behind the dividendbased approach: the dividend yield (%) plus the expected growth in dividends (%) equals the expected total return (%). In formulaic terms, it is just a reworking of the Gordon Growth Model, which says that the fair price of a stock (P) is a function of the dividend per share (D), growth in the dividend (g) and the required or expected rate of return (k):
EarningsBased Approach
Another approach looks at the pricetoearnings (P/E) ratio and its reciprocal: the earnings yield (earnings per share ÷ stock price). The idea is that the market's expected longrun real return is equal to the current earnings yield. For example, at the end of 2003, the P/E for the S&P 500 was almost 25. This theory says that the expected return is equal to the earnings yield of 4% (1 ÷ 25 = 4%). If that seems low, remember it's a real return. Add a rate of inflation to get a nominal return.
Here is the math that gets you the earningsbased approach:
Whereas a growth factor is explicitly added to the dividendbased approach, growth is implicit to the earnings model. It assumes the P/E multiple already impounds future growth. For example, if a company has a 4% earnings yield but doesn't pay dividends, then the model assumes the earnings are profitably reinvested at 4%.
Even experts disagree here. Some "rev up" the earnings model on the idea that, at higher P/E multiples, companies can use highpriced equity to make progressively more profitable investments. Arnott and Bernstein  authors of perhaps the definitive study  prefer the dividend approach precisely for the opposite reason. They show that, as companies grow, the retained earnings they often opt to reinvest result in only subpar returns  in other words, the retained earnings should have instead been distributed as dividends.
Handle with Care
Let's remember that the equity premium refers to a longterm estimate for the entire market of publiclytraded stocks. Lately several studies have cautioned that we should expect a fairly conservative premium in the future.
There are two reasons why academic studies, regardless of when they are conducted, are certain to produce low equity risk premiums.
The first is that the studies make an assumption that the market is correctly valued. In both the dividendbased approach and earningsbased approach, the dividend yield and earnings yield have reciprocal valuation multiples:
Both models assume that the valuation multiples  the pricetodividend and P/E ratio  are correct in the present and will not change going forward. This is understandable, for what else can these models do? It is notoriously difficult to predict an expansion or contraction of the market's valuation multiple. The earnings model might forecast 4% based on a P/E ratio of 25. And earnings may grow at 4%, but if the P/E multiple expands to 30 in the next year, then the total market return will be 25%, where multiple expansion alone contributes 20%! (30/25 1 = +20%)
The second reason low equity premiums tend to characterize academic estimates is that the total market growth is limited over the longterm. You'll recall that we have a factor for dividend growth in the dividendbased approach. Academic studies assume that dividend growth for the overall market  and, for that matter, earnings or EPS growth  cannot exceed the total economy's growth over the long term. If the economy grows at 4% as measured by gross domestic product (GDP) or national income, then studies assume that markets cannot collectively outpace this growth rate. Therefore, if you start with an assumption that the market's current valuation is approximately correct and you set the economy's growth as a limit on longterm dividend growth (or earnings or earnings per share growth), a real equity premium of 4 or 5% is pretty much impossible to exceed.
Now that we have explored the risk premium models and their challenges, it is time to look at them with actual data. The first step is to find a reasonable range of expected equity returns; step two is to deduct a riskfree rate of return and step three is to try to arrive at a reasonable equity risk premium.



Economics
Understanding Cost of Revenue
The cost of revenue is the total costs a business incurs to manufacture and deliver a product or service. 
Economics
Explaining Carrying Cost of Inventory
The carrying cost of inventory is the cost a business pays for holding goods in stock. 
Fundamental Analysis
Is India the Next Emerging Markets Superstar?
With a shift towards manufacturing and services, India could be the next emerging market superstar. Here, we provide a detailed breakdown of its GDP. 
Investing
How To Calculate Minority Interest
Minority interest calculations require the use of minority shareholders’ percentage ownership of a subsidiary, after controlling interest is acquired. 
Term
Estimating with Subjective Probability
Subjective probability is someone’s estimation that an event will occur. 
Economics
Explaining Replacement Cost
The replacement cost is the cost you’d have to pay to replace an asset with a similar asset at the present time and value. 
Economics
How Does National Income Accounting Work?
National income accounting is an economic term describing the system used by a country to gather data and determine aggregate economic activity. 
Investing Basics
Understanding the ModiglianiMiller Theorem
The ModiglianiMiller (M&M) theorem is used in financial and economic studies to analyze the value of a firm, such as a business or a corporation. 
Economics
Explaining Kurtosis
Kurtosis describes the distribution of data around an average. 
Personal Finance
Simple Interest Loans: Do They Exist?
Yes, they do. Here is what they are – and how to use them to your advantage.

PrincipalAgent Problem
The principalagent problem develops when a principal creates ... 
Quarter  Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4
A threemonth period on a financial calendar that acts as a basis ... 
Discount Bond
A bond that is issued for less than its par (or face) value, ... 
Surplus
The amount of an asset or resource that exceeds the portion that ... 
Cash Flow
The net amount of cash and cashequivalents moving into and out ... 
Days Sales Of Inventory  DSI
A financial measure of a company's performance that gives investors ...

What should I study in school to prepare for a career in corporate finance?
Depending on which area you want to specialize in, corporate finance can be one of the most competitive fields in business. ... Read Full Answer >> 
Why would a company issue preference shares instead of common shares?
Preference shares, or preferred stock, act as a hybrid between common shares and bond issues. As with any produced good or ... Read Full Answer >> 
What is the difference between cost of debt capital and cost of equity?
In corporate finance, capital – the money a business uses to fund operations – comes from two sources: debt and equity. While ... Read Full Answer >> 
What is the difference between gross profit, operating profit and net income?
The terms profit and income are often used interchangeably in daytoday life. In corporate finance, however, these terms ... Read Full Answer >> 
Can I use my IRA to pay for my college loans?
If you are older than 59.5 and have been contributing to your IRA for more than five years, you may withdraw funds to pay ... Read Full Answer >> 
Can I use my 401(k) to pay for my college loans?
If you are over 59.5, or separate from your plansponsoring employer after age 55, you are free to use your 401(k) to pay ... Read Full Answer >>