

Financial Leverage And Capital Structure Policy  Modigliani And Miller's Capital Structure Theories
Modigliani and Miller, two professors in the 1950s, studied capitalstructure theory intensely. From their analysis, they developed the capitalstructure irrelevance proposition. Essentially, they hypothesized that in perfect markets, it does not matter what capital structure a company uses to finance its operations. They theorized that the market value of a firm is determined by its earning power and by the risk of its underlying assets, and that its value is independent of the way it chooses to finance its investments or distribute dividends.
The basic M&M proposition is based on the following key assumptions:
 No taxes
 No transaction costs
 No bankruptcy costs
 Equivalence in borrowing costs for both companies and investors
 Symmetry of market information, meaning companies and investors have the same information
 No effect of debt on a company's earnings before interest and taxes
Of course, in the real world, there are taxes, transaction costs, bankruptcy costs, differences in borrowing costs, information asymmetries and effects of debt on earnings. To understand how the M&M proposition works after factoring in corporate taxes, however, we must first understand the basics of M&M propositions I and II without taxes.
Modigliani and Miller's CapitalStructure Irrelevance Proposition
The M&M capitalstructure irrelevance proposition assumes no taxes and no bankruptcy costs. In this simplified view, the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) should remain constant with changes in the company's capital structure. For example, no matter how the firm borrows, there will be no tax benefit from interest payments and thus no changes or benefits to the WACC. Additionally, since there are no changes or benefits from increases in debt, the capital structure does not influence a company's stock price, and the capital structure is therefore irrelevant to a company's stock price.
However, as we have stated, taxes and bankruptcy costs do significantly affect a company's stock price. In additional papers, Modigliani and Miller included both the effect of taxes and bankruptcy costs.
Modigliani and Miller's Tradeoff Theory of Leverage
The tradeoff theory assumes that there are benefits to leverage within a capital structure up until the optimal capital structure is reached. The theory recognizes the tax benefit from interest payments  that is, because interest paid on debt is tax deductible, issuing bonds effectively reduces a company's tax liability. Paying dividends on equity, however, does not. Thought of another way, the actual rate of interest companies pay on the bonds they issue is less than the nominal rate of interest because of the tax savings. Studies suggest, however, that most companies have less leverage than this theory would suggest is optimal. (Learn more about corporate tax liability in
In comparing the two theories, the main difference between them is the potential benefit from debt in a capital structure, which comes from the tax benefit of the interest payments. Since the MM capitalstructure irrelevance theory assumes no taxes, this benefit is not recognized, unlike the tradeoff theory of leverage, where taxes, and thus the tax benefit of interest payments, are recognized.
In summary, the MM I theory without corporate taxes says that a firm's relative proportions of debt and equity don't matter; MM I with corporate taxes says that the firm with the greater proportion of debt is more valuable because of the interest tax shield.
MM II deals with the WACC. It says that as the proportion of debt in the company's capital structure increases, its return on equity to shareholders increases in a linear fashion. The existence of higher debt levels makes investing in the company more risky, so shareholders demand a higher risk premium on the company's stock. However, because the company's capital structure is irrelevant, changes in the debtequity ratio do not affect WACC. MM II with corporate taxes acknowledges the corporate tax savings from the interest tax deduction and thus concludes that changes in the debtequity ratio do affect WACC. Therefore, a greater proportion of debt lowers the company's WACC. Bankruptcy Costs And Optimal Capital Structure



Professionals
The MM Capital Structure vs. The Tradeoff Theory of Leverage
CFA Level 1  The MM Capital Structure vs. The Tradeoff Theory of Leverage. Learn the assumptions behind Modigliani and Miller's capitalstructure irrelevance proposition and what this theory ... 
Professionals
Tax and Bankruptcy Costs
CFA Level 1  Tax and Bankruptcy Costs. Learn what effects taxes and bankruptcy costs have on capital structure. Contrasts the benefits of tax with the costs of possible bankruptcy. 
Professionals
Introduction To Financial Leverage And Capital Structure Policy
We introduce you to capital structure and bankruptcy. 
Professionals
Bankruptcy Costs And Optimal Capital Structure
We look at how debt and equity work together to form the optimal capital structure. 
Investing Basics
The Optimal Use Of Financial Leverage In A Corporate Capital Structure
The amount of debt and equity that makes up a company's capital structure has many risk and return implications. 
Bonds & Fixed Income
Investors Need A Good WACC
Weighted average cost of capital may be hard to calculate, but it's a solid way to measure investment quality. 
Fundamental Analysis
DCF Analysis: Calculating The Discount Rate
By Ben McClure Contact Ben Having projected the company's free cash flow for the next five years, we want to figure out what these cash flows are worth today. That means coming up with an appropriate ... 
Professionals
Introduction To Cost Of Capital
Cost of capital is very important for business budgeting and planning. 
Professionals
Factors that Influence a Company's CapitalStructure Decision
CFA Level 1  Factors that Influence a Company's CapitalStructure Decision. Learn how the leverage factors can affect a company's capitalstructure decision. Provides in depth descriptions ... 
Professionals
Weighted Average Cost Of Capital (WACC)
This important calculation helps figure out the cost of capital.

Irrelevance Proposition Theorem
A theory of corporate capital structure that posits that financial ... 
Traditional Theory Of Capital Structure
The theory that when the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) ... 
Weighted Average Cost Of Capital ...
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is a calculation of a ... 
Effective Tax Rate
The average rate at which an individual or corporation is taxed. ... 
Proportional Tax
A tax system that requires the same percentage of income from ... 
Tax Rate
The percentage at which an individual or corporation is taxed. ...

How do bankruptcy costs affect a company's capital structure?
Understand the Modigliani and Miller theory of capital structure. Learn how the theory shows how bankruptcy costs affect ... Read Answer >> 
What is capital structure theory?
Discover capital structure theory as it relates to financial management and the methods in which companies attempt to raise ... Read Answer >> 
What does a high weighted average cost of capital (WACC) signify?
Find out what it means for a company to have a relatively high weighted average cost of capital, or WACC, and why this is ... Read Answer >> 
Does the tradeoff model or the pecking order play a greater role in capital budgeting?
Understand the difference between the tradeoff theory and the pecking order theory, and learn what these theories tell companies ... Read Answer >> 
How do you calculate the ratio between debt and equity in the cost of capital
Discover how to calculate the ratio between debt and equity when making cost of capital estimations using the weighted average ... Read Answer >> 
What is the formula for calculating weighted average cost of capital (WACC)?
Weighted average cost of capital (WACC) is the average aftertax cost of a company’s various capital sources, including ... Read Answer >>